Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2/2007

01-02-2007 | Otology

Indication for the need of flexible and frequency specific mapping functions in cochlear implant speech processors

Author: Sebastian Hoth

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Categorical loudness scaling of electric and acoustic stimuli was performed in cochlear implant (CI) recipients equipped with Nucleus™ systems in order to achieve a normal loudness perception in the whole dynamic range of acoustic input. For each electrode, the lower and upper limits of electric stimulus were defined by the values corresponding to “very soft” and “too loud”. Within this dynamic range, the stimulus strength intervals associated to the verbal categories “soft”, “medium”, “loud” and “very loud” were determined. The same loudness categories were used for the scaling of acoustic stimuli. From both scaling experiments, the transduction of the CI system can be assessed and the parameters of the individual mapping function yielding a normal loudness growth can be derived. Deviations from optimum mapping can be corrected at least partially by manipulating the parameters of the mapping function. In many cases, however, one mapping function is not sufficient for all channels. The results argue in favour of the development of flexible and channel-specific mapping function parameters in future CI systems.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Blamey PJ, Dooley GJ, James DJ, Parisi ES (2000) Monaural and binaural loudness measures in cochlear implant users with contralateral residual hearing. Ear Hear 21:6–17PubMedCrossRef Blamey PJ, Dooley GJ, James DJ, Parisi ES (2000) Monaural and binaural loudness measures in cochlear implant users with contralateral residual hearing. Ear Hear 21:6–17PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Brand T, Hohmann V (2002) An adaptive procedure for categorical loudness scaling. J Acoust Soc Am 112:1597–1604PubMedCrossRefADS Brand T, Hohmann V (2002) An adaptive procedure for categorical loudness scaling. J Acoust Soc Am 112:1597–1604PubMedCrossRefADS
3.
go back to reference Cazals Y, Negrevergne M, Aran JM (1978) Electrical stimulation of the cochlea in man: hearing induction and tinnitus suppression. J Am Audiol Soc 3:209–213PubMed Cazals Y, Negrevergne M, Aran JM (1978) Electrical stimulation of the cochlea in man: hearing induction and tinnitus suppression. J Am Audiol Soc 3:209–213PubMed
4.
go back to reference Clark GM, Tong YC, Patrick JF, Seligman PM, Crosby PA, Kuzma JA, Money DK (1984) A multi-channel hearing prosthesis for profound-to-total hearing loss. J Med Eng Tech 8:3–8 Clark GM, Tong YC, Patrick JF, Seligman PM, Crosby PA, Kuzma JA, Money DK (1984) A multi-channel hearing prosthesis for profound-to-total hearing loss. J Med Eng Tech 8:3–8
5.
go back to reference Fu QJ, Shannon RV (2000) Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in nucleus-22 cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 21:227–235PubMedCrossRef Fu QJ, Shannon RV (2000) Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in nucleus-22 cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 21:227–235PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hellbrück J, Thomamüller D, Zeitler A (1995) Hörfeldaudiometrie mit Gruppen normalhörender Personen in natürlichen Schallfeldern. Audiol Akust 34:60–81 Hellbrück J, Thomamüller D, Zeitler A (1995) Hörfeldaudiometrie mit Gruppen normalhörender Personen in natürlichen Schallfeldern. Audiol Akust 34:60–81
7.
go back to reference Heller O (1985) Hörfeldaudiometrie mit dem Verfahren der Kategorienunterteilung (KU). Psychol Beitr 27:509–519MathSciNet Heller O (1985) Hörfeldaudiometrie mit dem Verfahren der Kategorienunterteilung (KU). Psychol Beitr 27:509–519MathSciNet
8.
go back to reference Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES, Burian K, Fischer RE (1981) Four years of experience with cochlear prostheses. Med Progr Technol 8:107–119 Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES, Burian K, Fischer RE (1981) Four years of experience with cochlear prostheses. Med Progr Technol 8:107–119
9.
go back to reference Hohmann V, Kollmeier B (1995) Weiterentwicklung und klinischer Einsatz der Hörfeldskalierung. Audiol Akust 34:48–59 Hohmann V, Kollmeier B (1995) Weiterentwicklung und klinischer Einsatz der Hörfeldskalierung. Audiol Akust 34:48–59
10.
go back to reference Hoth S (2001) Assessment and optimisation of loudness mapping in cochlear implants. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258:360 Hoth S (2001) Assessment and optimisation of loudness mapping in cochlear implants. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258:360
11.
go back to reference Hoth S, Lenarz T (1991) Erfahrungen mit der Elektrostimulation des Hörnerven vor Cochlea-Implantation. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 70:199–207CrossRef Hoth S, Lenarz T (1991) Erfahrungen mit der Elektrostimulation des Hörnerven vor Cochlea-Implantation. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 70:199–207CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hoppe U, Rosanowski F, Iro H, Eysholdt U (2001) Loudness perception and late auditory evoked potentials in adult cochlear implant users. Scand Audiol 30:119–125PubMedCrossRef Hoppe U, Rosanowski F, Iro H, Eysholdt U (2001) Loudness perception and late auditory evoked potentials in adult cochlear implant users. Scand Audiol 30:119–125PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference House WF, Edgerton BJ (1982) A multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 91(suppl):104–116 House WF, Edgerton BJ (1982) A multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 91(suppl):104–116
14.
go back to reference Kiessling J, Schubert M, Archut A (1996) Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (ScalAdapt). Scand Audiol 25:153–160PubMed Kiessling J, Schubert M, Archut A (1996) Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (ScalAdapt). Scand Audiol 25:153–160PubMed
15.
go back to reference Kießling J, Schubert M, Wagner I (1994) Lautheitsskalierung Ein Verfahren zum quantitativen Rekruitmentnachweis. HNO 42:350–357PubMed Kießling J, Schubert M, Wagner I (1994) Lautheitsskalierung Ein Verfahren zum quantitativen Rekruitmentnachweis. HNO 42:350–357PubMed
16.
go back to reference Lorenzi C, Sibellas J, Füllgrabe C, Gallégo S, Fugain C, Meyer B (2004) Effects of amplitude compression on first- and second-order modulation detection thresholds in cochlear implant listeners. Int J Audiol 43:264–270PubMedCrossRef Lorenzi C, Sibellas J, Füllgrabe C, Gallégo S, Fugain C, Meyer B (2004) Effects of amplitude compression on first- and second-order modulation detection thresholds in cochlear implant listeners. Int J Audiol 43:264–270PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Meikle MB, Lee CA (1981) Performance characteristics of intracochlear stimulating electrodes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 90:9–10 Meikle MB, Lee CA (1981) Performance characteristics of intracochlear stimulating electrodes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 90:9–10
18.
go back to reference Moon AK, Zwolan TA, Pfingst BE (1993) Effects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochlea. Hear Res 67:166–178PubMedCrossRef Moon AK, Zwolan TA, Pfingst BE (1993) Effects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochlea. Hear Res 67:166–178PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Moser LM (1987) Das Würzburger Hörfeld, ein Test für die prothetische Audiometrie. HNO 35:318–321PubMed Moser LM (1987) Das Würzburger Hörfeld, ein Test für die prothetische Audiometrie. HNO 35:318–321PubMed
20.
go back to reference Nieschalk M, Schmäl F, Delank KW, Stoll W (1999) Die kategoriale Lautheitsskalierung Ein Beitrag zur Lautheitswahrnehmung bei kochleären und retrokochleären Hörstörungen. HNO 47:787–795PubMedCrossRef Nieschalk M, Schmäl F, Delank KW, Stoll W (1999) Die kategoriale Lautheitsskalierung Ein Beitrag zur Lautheitswahrnehmung bei kochleären und retrokochleären Hörstörungen. HNO 47:787–795PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pfingst BE, Spelman FA, Sutton D (1980) Operating ranges for cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 89(suppl 66):1–4 Pfingst BE, Spelman FA, Sutton D (1980) Operating ranges for cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 89(suppl 66):1–4
22.
go back to reference Pfingst BE (1984) Operating ranges and intensity psychophysics for cochlear implants Implications for speech processing strategies. Arch Otolaryngol 110:140–144PubMed Pfingst BE (1984) Operating ranges and intensity psychophysics for cochlear implants Implications for speech processing strategies. Arch Otolaryngol 110:140–144PubMed
23.
go back to reference Shannon RV (1981) Growth of loudness for sinusoidal and pulsatile electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 90:13–14 Shannon RV (1981) Growth of loudness for sinusoidal and pulsatile electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 90:13–14
24.
go back to reference Shannon RV (1983) Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I Basic psychophysics Hear Res 11:157–189 Shannon RV (1983) Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I Basic psychophysics Hear Res 11:157–189
25.
go back to reference Simmons FB (1966) Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. Arch Otolaryngol 84:24–76 Simmons FB (1966) Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. Arch Otolaryngol 84:24–76
26.
go back to reference Zeng FG, Shannon RV (1994) Loudness-coding mechanisms inferred from electric stimulation of the human auditory system. Science 264(5158):564–566PubMedCrossRefADS Zeng FG, Shannon RV (1994) Loudness-coding mechanisms inferred from electric stimulation of the human auditory system. Science 264(5158):564–566PubMedCrossRefADS
27.
go back to reference Zeng FG, Shannon RV (1995) Loudness of simple and complex stimuli in electric hearing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 166(suppl):235–258 Zeng FG, Shannon RV (1995) Loudness of simple and complex stimuli in electric hearing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 166(suppl):235–258
Metadata
Title
Indication for the need of flexible and frequency specific mapping functions in cochlear implant speech processors
Author
Sebastian Hoth
Publication date
01-02-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0159-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2/2007 Go to the issue