Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2019

01-10-2019 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Prognosis for deliveries in face presentation: a case–control study

Authors: Emmanuelle Arsène, C. Langlois, E. Clouqueur, P. Deruelle, D. Subtil

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To estimate the maternal and fetal prognosis for attempted vaginal deliveries of fetuses in face compared with vertex presentations. To evaluate the factors associated with a cesarean during labor for fetuses in face presentation.

Methods

This case–control study collected all the cases of face presentation in a university hospital level-3 maternity ward between 22 and 42 weeks of gestation over a 16-year period. For each case, we selected three control cases with vertex presentations delivered the same day. Cesareans before labor were excluded.

Results

We compared 60 attempted vaginal deliveries of fetuses in face presentation with 174 of fetuses in vertex presentation. The cesarean rate during labor was more than three times higher for the face presentations (31.7 vs 9.2%, P < 0.0001). Arterial pH values and Apgar scores were similar in both sets of newborns. After logistic regression, the factors associated with a cesarean during labor were nulliparity and early diagnosis of the presentation (i.e., before 5 cm dilatation). The initial position (mentum-anterior vs. transverse or posterior) was not significantly associated with the mode of delivery.

Conclusions

In face presentations, attempted vaginal delivery triples the cesarean risk. Nonetheless, more than two-thirds of these women give birth vaginally without any impairment of neonatal condition.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cunningham FG, Williams JW (2010) Williams obstetrics, 23rd edn. McGraw-Hill Medical, New York Cunningham FG, Williams JW (2010) Williams obstetrics, 23rd edn. McGraw-Hill Medical, New York
2.
go back to reference Cruikshank DP, Cruikshank JE (1981) Face and brow presentation: a review. Clin Obstet Gynecol 24(2):333–351CrossRef Cruikshank DP, Cruikshank JE (1981) Face and brow presentation: a review. Clin Obstet Gynecol 24(2):333–351CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Seeds JW, Cefalo RC (1982) Malpresentations. Clin Obstet Gynecol 25(1):145–156CrossRef Seeds JW, Cefalo RC (1982) Malpresentations. Clin Obstet Gynecol 25(1):145–156CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Posner AC, Cohn S (1951) An analysis of 45 face presentations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 62(3):592–599CrossRef Posner AC, Cohn S (1951) An analysis of 45 face presentations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 62(3):592–599CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Reinke T (1953) Face presentation: a review of 94 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 66(6):1185–1190CrossRef Reinke T (1953) Face presentation: a review of 94 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 66(6):1185–1190CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Duff P (1981) Diagnosis and management of face presentation. Obstet Gynecol 57(1):105–112PubMed Duff P (1981) Diagnosis and management of face presentation. Obstet Gynecol 57(1):105–112PubMed
7.
go back to reference Posner AC, Buch IM (1943) Face and persistent brow presentations. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics 77:618–630 Posner AC, Buch IM (1943) Face and persistent brow presentations. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics 77:618–630
8.
go back to reference Sharmila V, Babu TA (2014) Unusual birth trauma involving face: a completely preventable iatrogenic injury. J Clin Neonatol 3(2):120–121CrossRef Sharmila V, Babu TA (2014) Unusual birth trauma involving face: a completely preventable iatrogenic injury. J Clin Neonatol 3(2):120–121CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chaoui A (1982) La présentation de la face. Facteurs de risques; déductions thérapeutiques. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 11:731–738 Chaoui A (1982) La présentation de la face. Facteurs de risques; déductions thérapeutiques. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 11:731–738
10.
go back to reference Benedetti TJ, Lowensohn RI, Truscott AM (1980) Face presentation at term. Obstet Gynecol 55(2):199–202PubMed Benedetti TJ, Lowensohn RI, Truscott AM (1980) Face presentation at term. Obstet Gynecol 55(2):199–202PubMed
11.
go back to reference Bhal PS, Davies NJ, Chung T (1998) A population study of face and brow presentation. J Obstet Gynaecol 18(3):231–235CrossRef Bhal PS, Davies NJ, Chung T (1998) A population study of face and brow presentation. J Obstet Gynaecol 18(3):231–235CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shaffer BL, Cheng YW, Vargas JE, Laros RK, Caughey AB (2006) Face presentation: predictors and delivery route. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 194(5):e10–e12CrossRef Shaffer BL, Cheng YW, Vargas JE, Laros RK, Caughey AB (2006) Face presentation: predictors and delivery route. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 194(5):e10–e12CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ducarme G, Ceccaldi P-F, Chesnoy V, Robinet G, Gabriel R (2006) Face presentation: retrospective study of 32 cases at term. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 34(5):393–396CrossRef Ducarme G, Ceccaldi P-F, Chesnoy V, Robinet G, Gabriel R (2006) Face presentation: retrospective study of 32 cases at term. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 34(5):393–396CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zayed F, Amarin Z, Obeidat B, Obeidat N, Alchalabi H, Lataifeh I (2008) Face and brow presentation in northern Jordan, over a decade of experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 278(5):427–430CrossRef Zayed F, Amarin Z, Obeidat B, Obeidat N, Alchalabi H, Lataifeh I (2008) Face and brow presentation in northern Jordan, over a decade of experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 278(5):427–430CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schwartz Z, Dgani R, Lancet M, Kessler I (1986) Face presentation. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 26(3):172–176CrossRef Schwartz Z, Dgani R, Lancet M, Kessler I (1986) Face presentation. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 26(3):172–176CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Arsene E, Langlois C, Garabedian C, Clouqueur E, Deruelle P, Subtil D (2016) Prenatal factors related to face presentation: a case control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294(2):279–284CrossRef Arsene E, Langlois C, Garabedian C, Clouqueur E, Deruelle P, Subtil D (2016) Prenatal factors related to face presentation: a case control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294(2):279–284CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Audra P, Jacquot F (1988) Deflected cephalic presentation. A propos of 80 cases. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 83(5):355–357PubMed Audra P, Jacquot F (1988) Deflected cephalic presentation. A propos of 80 cases. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 83(5):355–357PubMed
Metadata
Title
Prognosis for deliveries in face presentation: a case–control study
Authors
Emmanuelle Arsène
C. Langlois
E. Clouqueur
P. Deruelle
D. Subtil
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05241-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2019 Go to the issue