Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2019

01-01-2019 | General Gynecology

Adherence to gynecological screening impacted by experienced orthodontic treatment in childhood

Authors: Sarah Schott, Judith Heinzler, Nathalie Rippinger, Thomas Bruckner, Janina Brucker, Janine Hoffmann, Nadja Dornhöfer, Christine Dinkic, Stephan Seitz, Joachim Rom, Christof Sohn, Timm C. Schott

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Dental and cervical controls are two established screening programs in Germany. Compliance to orthodontic treatment in childhood is essential for dental health and one of the first health interventions that requires adherent behavior; therefore, it may be associated with participation in further screening programs in adulthood. However, it is not yet known whether early orthodontic treatment influences long-term screening adherence.

Methods

Using a questionnaire administered during a visit to a special dysplasia outpatient service, this case–control study evaluated women’s personal history of orthodontic care, long-term satisfaction, and dental and gynecological screening adherence. Oral health status and dental anxiety were assessed with validated instruments. Cases were categorized as cervical dysplasia only (S2) or cervical dysplasia with conization (S1) and compared to healthy controls with a normal PAP smear.

Results

A study population of 233 participants included 132 cases and 101 controls. The control group had had orthodontic treatment during childhood more often than our study population with abnormal PAP smears (68.3% controls versus 56.1% subjects; p < 0.005). Orthodontic treatment was not associated with attending dental appointment or gynecological check-ups. However, women with an orthodontic treatment in childhood were significantly more often vaccinated against human papillomavirus than women without orthodontic treatment (p < 0.03).

Conclusion

Data suggest that women with orthodontic treatment in childhood are more conscious about prevention strategies in adulthood; therefore, compliant behavior might be established in childhood.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American College of, O., P. Gynecologists Women’s Health Care, W. Committee on Health Care for Underserved (2013) Committee opinion no. 569: oral health care during pregnancy and through the lifespan. Obstet Gynecol 122(21):417–422 American College of, O., P. Gynecologists Women’s Health Care, W. Committee on Health Care for Underserved (2013) Committee opinion no. 569: oral health care during pregnancy and through the lifespan. Obstet Gynecol 122(21):417–422
2.
go back to reference Ahdi M et al (2015) Oral health information from the dentist to the diabetologist. Eur J Intern Med 26(7):498–503CrossRefPubMed Ahdi M et al (2015) Oral health information from the dentist to the diabetologist. Eur J Intern Med 26(7):498–503CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Isong IA et al (2010) Association between parents’ and children’s use of oral health services. Pediatrics 125(3):502–508CrossRefPubMed Isong IA et al (2010) Association between parents’ and children’s use of oral health services. Pediatrics 125(3):502–508CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schott TC, Ludwig B (2014) Microelectronic wear-time documentation of removable orthodontic devices detects heterogeneous wear behavior and individualizes treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 146(2):155–160CrossRefPubMed Schott TC, Ludwig B (2014) Microelectronic wear-time documentation of removable orthodontic devices detects heterogeneous wear behavior and individualizes treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 146(2):155–160CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Anttila A et al (2009) Description of the national situation of cervical cancer screening in the member states of the European Union. Eur J Cancer 45(15):2685–2708CrossRefPubMed Anttila A et al (2009) Description of the national situation of cervical cancer screening in the member states of the European Union. Eur J Cancer 45(15):2685–2708CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Geyer S, Jaunzeme J, Hillemanns P (2014) Cervical cancer screening in Germany: group-specific participation rates in the state of Niedersachsen (Lower Saxony). A study with health insurance data. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291(3):623–629CrossRefPubMed Geyer S, Jaunzeme J, Hillemanns P (2014) Cervical cancer screening in Germany: group-specific participation rates in the state of Niedersachsen (Lower Saxony). A study with health insurance data. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291(3):623–629CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Nowakowski A et al (2015) The implementation of an organised cervical screening programme in Poland: an analysis of the adherence to European guidelines. BMC Cancer 15:279CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nowakowski A et al (2015) The implementation of an organised cervical screening programme in Poland: an analysis of the adherence to European guidelines. BMC Cancer 15:279CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Verdoodt F et al (2015) Reaching women who do not participate in the regular cervical cancer screening programme by offering self-sampling kits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Cancer 51(16):2375–2385CrossRefPubMed Verdoodt F et al (2015) Reaching women who do not participate in the regular cervical cancer screening programme by offering self-sampling kits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Cancer 51(16):2375–2385CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Thangarajah F et al (2016) Cervical screening program and the psychological impact of an abnormal Pap smear: a self-assessment questionnaire study of 590 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293(2):391–398CrossRefPubMed Thangarajah F et al (2016) Cervical screening program and the psychological impact of an abnormal Pap smear: a self-assessment questionnaire study of 590 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293(2):391–398CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sroczynski G et al (2011) Cost-effectiveness of primary HPV screening for cervical cancer in Germany—a decision analysis. Eur J Cancer 47(11):1633–1646CrossRefPubMed Sroczynski G et al (2011) Cost-effectiveness of primary HPV screening for cervical cancer in Germany—a decision analysis. Eur J Cancer 47(11):1633–1646CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Berardi R et al (2013) Compliance with breast and cervical cancer screening programs in women: results from a population-based study. Tumori 99(5):565–571CrossRefPubMed Berardi R et al (2013) Compliance with breast and cervical cancer screening programs in women: results from a population-based study. Tumori 99(5):565–571CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Martin-Lopez R et al (2010) Breast and cervical cancer screening in Spain and predictors of adherence. Eur J Cancer Prev 19(3):239–245CrossRefPubMed Martin-Lopez R et al (2010) Breast and cervical cancer screening in Spain and predictors of adherence. Eur J Cancer Prev 19(3):239–245CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Logan L, McIlfatrick S (2011) Exploring women’s knowledge, experiences and perceptions of cervical cancer screening in an area of social deprivation. Eur J Cancer Care 20(6):720–727CrossRef Logan L, McIlfatrick S (2011) Exploring women’s knowledge, experiences and perceptions of cervical cancer screening in an area of social deprivation. Eur J Cancer Care 20(6):720–727CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Thangarajah F et al (2015) Cervical screening program and the psychological impact of an abnormal Pap smear: a self-assessment questionnaire study of 590 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293(2):391–398CrossRefPubMed Thangarajah F et al (2015) Cervical screening program and the psychological impact of an abnormal Pap smear: a self-assessment questionnaire study of 590 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293(2):391–398CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Schäfer K et al (2015) Quantifying patient adherence during active orthodontic treatment with removable appliances using microelectronic wear-time documentation. Eur J Orthod 37(1):73–80CrossRefPubMed Schäfer K et al (2015) Quantifying patient adherence during active orthodontic treatment with removable appliances using microelectronic wear-time documentation. Eur J Orthod 37(1):73–80CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Schott TC et al (2013) Quantification of patient compliance with Hawley retainers and removable functional appliances during the retention phase. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144(4):533–540CrossRefPubMed Schott TC et al (2013) Quantification of patient compliance with Hawley retainers and removable functional appliances during the retention phase. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144(4):533–540CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Humphris GM, Morrison T, Lindsay SJ (1995) The Modified Dental Anxiety Scale: validation and United Kingdom norms. Community Dent Health 12(3):143–150PubMed Humphris GM, Morrison T, Lindsay SJ (1995) The Modified Dental Anxiety Scale: validation and United Kingdom norms. Community Dent Health 12(3):143–150PubMed
20.
go back to reference Slade GD (1997) Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 25(4):284–290CrossRefPubMed Slade GD (1997) Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 25(4):284–290CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Smith JS et al (2002) Herpes simplex virus-2 as a human papillomavirus cofactor in the etiology of invasive cervical cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(21):1604–1613CrossRefPubMed Smith JS et al (2002) Herpes simplex virus-2 as a human papillomavirus cofactor in the etiology of invasive cervical cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(21):1604–1613CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wallin KL et al (2002) A population-based prospective study of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and cervical carcinoma. Int J Cancer 101(4):371–374CrossRefPubMed Wallin KL et al (2002) A population-based prospective study of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and cervical carcinoma. Int J Cancer 101(4):371–374CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Castellsague X, Bosch FX, Munoz N (2002) Environmental co-factors in HPV carcinogenesis. Virus Res 89(2):191–199CrossRefPubMed Castellsague X, Bosch FX, Munoz N (2002) Environmental co-factors in HPV carcinogenesis. Virus Res 89(2):191–199CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Schenk L, Knopf H (2007) Mundgesundheitsverhalten von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 50(5):653–658CrossRefPubMed Schenk L, Knopf H (2007) Mundgesundheitsverhalten von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 50(5):653–658CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Krey KF, Hirsch C (2012) Frequency of orthodontic treatment in German children and adolescents: influence of age, gender, and socio-economic status. Eur J Orthod 34(2):152–157CrossRefPubMed Krey KF, Hirsch C (2012) Frequency of orthodontic treatment in German children and adolescents: influence of age, gender, and socio-economic status. Eur J Orthod 34(2):152–157CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Lampert T, Kurth BM (2007) Sozialer Status und Gesundheit von Kindern und Jugendlichen: Ergebnisse des Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitssurveys (KiGGS). Dtsch Arztebl Int 6(11):521 Lampert T, Kurth BM (2007) Sozialer Status und Gesundheit von Kindern und Jugendlichen: Ergebnisse des Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitssurveys (KiGGS). Dtsch Arztebl Int 6(11):521
27.
go back to reference Schuster MA, Fuentes-Afflick E (2017) Caring for children by supporting parents. N Engl J Med 376(5):410–413CrossRefPubMed Schuster MA, Fuentes-Afflick E (2017) Caring for children by supporting parents. N Engl J Med 376(5):410–413CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Hillienhof A (2016) Mammographie: erstmals weniger Teilnehmerinnen beim Screening. Dtsch Arztebl Int 113(51–52):2352 Hillienhof A (2016) Mammographie: erstmals weniger Teilnehmerinnen beim Screening. Dtsch Arztebl Int 113(51–52):2352
Metadata
Title
Adherence to gynecological screening impacted by experienced orthodontic treatment in childhood
Authors
Sarah Schott
Judith Heinzler
Nathalie Rippinger
Thomas Bruckner
Janina Brucker
Janine Hoffmann
Nadja Dornhöfer
Christine Dinkic
Stephan Seitz
Joachim Rom
Christof Sohn
Timm C. Schott
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4950-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2019 Go to the issue