Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2018

01-12-2018 | Correspondence

Reply to letter to the editor

Author: Shiri Shinar

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

The study we published [1] was the research article based on the complete final cohort. The previous paper, published in AJOG [2] was only an abstract, based on partial preliminary data, for the SMFM conference, and for that reason its results differ from those of the complete study. Also, this study was not powered for its outcome due to its limited sample size, and was not argued to be. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shinar S, Blecher Y, Alpern S et al (2017) Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:1185–1189CrossRef Shinar S, Blecher Y, Alpern S et al (2017) Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:1185–1189CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Shinar S, Ashwal E, Blecher Y et al (2016) Bilateral salpingectomy vs tubal ligation for permanent sterilization during a cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 216:S415–S416CrossRef Shinar S, Ashwal E, Blecher Y et al (2016) Bilateral salpingectomy vs tubal ligation for permanent sterilization during a cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 216:S415–S416CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reply to letter to the editor
Author
Shiri Shinar
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4904-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2018 Go to the issue