Published in:
01-05-2018 | Correction
Correction to: Predictors of cerclage failure in patients with singleton pregnancy undergoing prophylactic cervical cerclage
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 5/2018
Login to get accessExcerpt
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The presentation of Table 3 was incorrect. The corrected Table 3 is given below.
Table 3
Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated to early preterm delivery after prophylactic cerclage (all patients, n = 39)
|
Early preterm delivery
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Univariate analysis
|
Multivariate analysis
|
|||
|
OR (95% CI)
|
p
|
OR (95% CI)
|
p
|
|
|
Age
|
1.12 (0.96, 1.30)
|
0.132
|
1.13 (0.95, 1.34)
|
0.153
|
|
BMI
|
0.94 (0.83, 1.08)
|
0.427
|
||
|
History of conization (yes/no)
|
1.33 (0.19, 0.02)
|
0.768
|
||
|
History of instrumentation of uterus (yes/no)
|
6.67 (1.47, 30.2)
|
0.014
|
6.83 (1.38, 33.8)
|
0.019
|
|
Cervical swabs prior to cerclage (pos/neg)
|
0.61 (0.13, 2.74)
|
0.521
|
||
|
History of II trimester miscarriage (yes/no)
|
0.75 (0.11, 5.07)
|
0.768
|
||
|
CPR value after cerclage
|
0.91 (0.75, 1.10)
|
0.346
|
||
|
GA at the cerclage
|
0.93 (0.79, 1.09)
|
0.384
|
||
|
Delta-US at 10 days after cerclage
|
0.96 (0.91, 1.01)
|
0.139
|
0.97 (0.91, 1.04)
|
0.478
|