Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2017

01-04-2017 | General Gynecology

Different routes of misoprostol for cervical priming in first trimester surgical abortions: a randomized blind trial

Authors: Hadas Ganer Herman, Ram Kerner, Ohad Gluck, Hagit Feit, Ran Keidar, Jacob Bar, Ron Sagiv

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare effectiveness and patient satisfaction of different routes of misoprostol for short-term (same day) cervical priming in first trimester surgical abortions.

Methods

In a blind randomized trial, patients undergoing surgical abortion at a gestational age of 6 + 0–14 + 6 were administered oral, vaginal, or sub-lingual 400 mcg misoprostol, 1.5 to 4 h prior to procedure. Surgeons blinded to patient allocation evaluated cervical priming. The primary outcome was initial cervical dilatation. Secondary outcomes were cervical consistency, ease of dilation, patient discomfort, and side effects.

Results

From July 2015 through May 2016, 120 patients were randomized as follows: 40 to oral, 40 to vaginal, and 40 to sublingual misoprostol administration. No differences were noted in patient age, gestational age, curettage indication (termination/delayed miscarriage), past vaginal delivery, and administration to procedure interval. Initial cervical dilatation was similar between the groups, as were cervical consistency and ease of dilation. Patients noted the greatest discomfort and side effects with sublingual administration. The followings were found to be independently associated with cervical dilatation in a linear regression analysis: sublingual administration, gestational age, missed abortion, and previous vaginal delivery. Side effects and administration to procedure interval were found non-significant.

Conclusion

The same day cervical priming for first trimester surgical abortion is similarly achieved with all routes of misoprostol administration. In cases of termination of pregnancy with no prior vaginal delivery, sublingual administration may be considered, but entails a higher rate of side effects and patient discomfort.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Burnett MA, Corbett CA, Gertenstein RJ (2005) A randomized trial of laminaria tents versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening in first trimester surgical abortion. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada JOGC = J d’obstétrique gynécologie du Canada JOGC. 27(1):38–42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15937581. Accessed 18 May 2016 Burnett MA, Corbett CA, Gertenstein RJ (2005) A randomized trial of laminaria tents versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening in first trimester surgical abortion. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada JOGC = J d’obstétrique gynécologie du Canada JOGC. 27(1):38–42. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​15937581. Accessed 18 May 2016
4.
go back to reference Meirik O, My Huong NT, Piaggio G, Bergel E, von Hertzen H (2012 ) Complications of first-trimester abortion by vacuum aspiration after cervical preparation with and without misoprostol: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet (London, England). 379(9828):1817–24. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22405255. Accessed 18 May 2016 Meirik O, My Huong NT, Piaggio G, Bergel E, von Hertzen H (2012 ) Complications of first-trimester abortion by vacuum aspiration after cervical preparation with and without misoprostol: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet (London, England). 379(9828):1817–24. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​22405255. Accessed 18 May 2016
5.
go back to reference Beucher G, Dolley P, Carles G, Salaun F, Asselin I, Dreyfus M (2014) [Misoprostol: off-label use in the first trimester of pregnancy (spontaneous abortion, and voluntary medical termination of pregnancy)]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 43(2):123–45. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24433988. Accessed 18 May 2016 Beucher G, Dolley P, Carles G, Salaun F, Asselin I, Dreyfus M (2014) [Misoprostol: off-label use in the first trimester of pregnancy (spontaneous abortion, and voluntary medical termination of pregnancy)]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 43(2):123–45. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​24433988. Accessed 18 May 2016
12.
go back to reference Allen RH, Goldberg A (2016) Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks’ gestation). Contraception 93(4):277–291CrossRefPubMed Allen RH, Goldberg A (2016) Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks’ gestation). Contraception 93(4):277–291CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Ohannessian A, Baumstarck K, Maruani J, Cohen-Solal E, Auquier P, Agostini A (2016) Mifepristone and misoprostol for cervical ripening in surgical abortion between 12 and 14 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 201:151–5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27132200. Accessed 20 May 2016 Ohannessian A, Baumstarck K, Maruani J, Cohen-Solal E, Auquier P, Agostini A (2016) Mifepristone and misoprostol for cervical ripening in surgical abortion between 12 and 14 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 201:151–5. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​27132200. Accessed 20 May 2016
21.
go back to reference Oppegaard KS, Abdelnoor M, Nesheim B-I, Jerve F, Eskild A (2004) The use of oral misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming: a randomised controlled trial of 400 versus 200 microg in first trimester pregnancies. BJOG. 111(2):154–9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14723753. Accessed 21 May 2016 Oppegaard KS, Abdelnoor M, Nesheim B-I, Jerve F, Eskild A (2004) The use of oral misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming: a randomised controlled trial of 400 versus 200 microg in first trimester pregnancies. BJOG. 111(2):154–9. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​14723753. Accessed 21 May 2016
27.
28.
go back to reference Cakir L, Dilbaz B, Caliskan E, Dede FS, Dilbaz S, Haberal A (2005) Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before manual vacuum aspiration of first trimester pregnancy under local anesthesia: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Contraception. 71(5):337–42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15854633. Accessed 21 May 2016 Cakir L, Dilbaz B, Caliskan E, Dede FS, Dilbaz S, Haberal A (2005) Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before manual vacuum aspiration of first trimester pregnancy under local anesthesia: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Contraception. 71(5):337–42. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​15854633. Accessed 21 May 2016
32.
go back to reference Wu WX, Ma XH, Zhang Q, Nathanielsz PW (2001) Characterization of topology-, gestation- and labor-related changes of a cassette of myometrial contraction-associated protein mRNA in the pregnant baboon myometrium. J Endocrinol. 171(3):445–53. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11739010. Accessed 21 May 2016 Wu WX, Ma XH, Zhang Q, Nathanielsz PW (2001) Characterization of topology-, gestation- and labor-related changes of a cassette of myometrial contraction-associated protein mRNA in the pregnant baboon myometrium. J Endocrinol. 171(3):445–53. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​11739010. Accessed 21 May 2016
33.
go back to reference Nissi R, Santala M, Immonen E, Talvensaari-Mattila A (2016) Mifepristone and misoprostol is safe and effective method in the second-trimester pregnancy termination. Arch Gynecol Obstet Germany 294(6):1243–7CrossRef Nissi R, Santala M, Immonen E, Talvensaari-Mattila A (2016) Mifepristone and misoprostol is safe and effective method in the second-trimester pregnancy termination. Arch Gynecol Obstet Germany 294(6):1243–7CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Iavazzo C, Mamais I, Gkegkes ID (2015) Use of misoprostol in myomectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet Germany 292(6):1185–91CrossRef Iavazzo C, Mamais I, Gkegkes ID (2015) Use of misoprostol in myomectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet Germany 292(6):1185–91CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Different routes of misoprostol for cervical priming in first trimester surgical abortions: a randomized blind trial
Authors
Hadas Ganer Herman
Ram Kerner
Ohad Gluck
Hagit Feit
Ran Keidar
Jacob Bar
Ron Sagiv
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4329-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2017 Go to the issue