Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Randomized double-blind placebo controlled study of preinduction cervical priming with 25 µg of misoprostol in the outpatient setting to prevent formal induction of labour

Authors: Jameela PonMalar, Santosh Joseph Benjamin, Anuja Abraham, Swati Rathore, Visalakshi Jeyaseelan, Jiji Elizabeth Mathews

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To compare the efficacy of preinduction outpatient use of a single dose of 25 μg vaginal misoprostol between 381/2 and 40 weeks with that of placebo, to decrease the interval from intervention to delivery after stretch and sweep in low-risk gravid women with Bishop’s score <4.

Method

Sixty three women received 25 μg vaginal misoprostol and 63 women received placebo after stretch and sweep.

Results

The duration from intervention to delivery was 3.35 (1.12–9.46) days in the misoprostol group and 5.42 (2.39–10.11) days in the placebo group which was statistically significant (p = 0.029). Spontaneous labor was seen in 39 women (61.9 %) in the misoprostol group and 35 women (55.6 %) in the placebo group (p = 0.531). Eight women in the misoprostol group and 18 in the placebo group had Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS) and this difference was also statistically significant (p = 0.027). There were no major maternal and neonatal complications in both groups.

Conclusion

Preinduction use of 25 μg vaginal misoprostol after stretch and sweep in the outpatient setting decreased the intervention to delivery interval when compared to placebo.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Olesen AW, Westergaard JG, Olsen J (2003) Perinatal and maternal complications related to postterm delivery: a national register-based study, 1978–1993. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(1):222–227CrossRefPubMed Olesen AW, Westergaard JG, Olsen J (2003) Perinatal and maternal complications related to postterm delivery: a national register-based study, 1978–1993. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(1):222–227CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Joseph KS (2011) The natural history of pregnancy: diseases of early and late gestation. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 118(13):1617–1629CrossRef Joseph KS (2011) The natural history of pregnancy: diseases of early and late gestation. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 118(13):1617–1629CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mandruzzato G, Alfirevic Z, Chervenak F, Gruenebaum A, Heimstad R, Heinonen S et al (2010) Guidelines for the management of postterm pregnancy. J Perinat Med 38:111–119CrossRefPubMed Mandruzzato G, Alfirevic Z, Chervenak F, Gruenebaum A, Heimstad R, Heinonen S et al (2010) Guidelines for the management of postterm pregnancy. J Perinat Med 38:111–119CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Morris JM, Thompson K, Smithey J, Gaffney G, Cooke I, Chamberlain P, Hope P, Altman D, MacKenzie IZ (2003) The usefulness of ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid in predicting adverse outcome in prolonged pregnancy: a prospective blinded observational study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 110(11):989–994CrossRef Morris JM, Thompson K, Smithey J, Gaffney G, Cooke I, Chamberlain P, Hope P, Altman D, MacKenzie IZ (2003) The usefulness of ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid in predicting adverse outcome in prolonged pregnancy: a prospective blinded observational study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 110(11):989–994CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ugwu EO, Obi SN, Iferikigwe ES, Dim CC, Ezugwu FO (2014) Membrane stripping to prevent post-term pregnancy in Enugu, Nigeria: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289(1):29–34CrossRefPubMed Ugwu EO, Obi SN, Iferikigwe ES, Dim CC, Ezugwu FO (2014) Membrane stripping to prevent post-term pregnancy in Enugu, Nigeria: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289(1):29–34CrossRefPubMed
8.
10.
go back to reference ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics (2009) ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 114:386CrossRef ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics (2009) ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 114:386CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C (2010) Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD000941 Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C (2010) Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD000941
12.
go back to reference McMaster K, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM (2015) Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 122(4):468–476CrossRef McMaster K, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM (2015) Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 122(4):468–476CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Calder AA, Loughney AD, Weir CJ, Barber JW (2008) Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 115(10):1279–1288CrossRef Calder AA, Loughney AD, Weir CJ, Barber JW (2008) Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 115(10):1279–1288CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Teixeira C, Lunet N, Rodrigues T, Barros H (2012) The Bishop Score as a determinant of labour induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch gynecol obstet 286(3):739–753CrossRefPubMed Teixeira C, Lunet N, Rodrigues T, Barros H (2012) The Bishop Score as a determinant of labour induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch gynecol obstet 286(3):739–753CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Stitely ML, Browning J, Fowler M, Gendron RT, Gherman RB (2000) Outpatient cervical ripening with intravaginal misoprostol. Obstet Gynecol 96(5, Part 1):684–688PubMed Stitely ML, Browning J, Fowler M, Gendron RT, Gherman RB (2000) Outpatient cervical ripening with intravaginal misoprostol. Obstet Gynecol 96(5, Part 1):684–688PubMed
17.
go back to reference Javadekar D, Rokade A, Alchemy V (2013) Can term gestation be induced by misoprostol on OPD basis? J Evol Med Dent Sci 1(2):3929–3936CrossRef Javadekar D, Rokade A, Alchemy V (2013) Can term gestation be induced by misoprostol on OPD basis? J Evol Med Dent Sci 1(2):3929–3936CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Adeniji AO, Akinola E (2013) A comparison of orally administered misoprostol and membrane sweeping for labour induction in uncomplicated singleton post-term pregnancies. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol 19(1):4–7 Adeniji AO, Akinola E (2013) A comparison of orally administered misoprostol and membrane sweeping for labour induction in uncomplicated singleton post-term pregnancies. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol 19(1):4–7
19.
go back to reference Incerpi MH, Fassett MJ, Kjos SL, Tran SH, Wing DA (2001) Vaginally administered misoprostol for outpatient cervical ripening in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185(4):916–919CrossRefPubMed Incerpi MH, Fassett MJ, Kjos SL, Tran SH, Wing DA (2001) Vaginally administered misoprostol for outpatient cervical ripening in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185(4):916–919CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Randomized double-blind placebo controlled study of preinduction cervical priming with 25 µg of misoprostol in the outpatient setting to prevent formal induction of labour
Authors
Jameela PonMalar
Santosh Joseph Benjamin
Anuja Abraham
Swati Rathore
Visalakshi Jeyaseelan
Jiji Elizabeth Mathews
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4173-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2017 Go to the issue