Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2016

Open Access 01-10-2016 | Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine

Gestational length assignment based on last menstrual period, first trimester crown-rump length, ovulation, and implantation timing

Authors: Amita A. Mahendru, Charlotte S. Wilhelm-Benartzi , Ian B. Wilkinson, Carmel M. McEniery, Sarah Johnson, Christoph Lees

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Understanding the natural length of human pregnancy is central to clinical care. However, variability in the reference methods to assign gestational age (GA) confound our understanding of pregnancy length. Assignation from ultrasound measurement of fetal crown-rump length (CRL) has superseded that based on last menstrual period (LMP). Our aim was to estimate gestational length based on LMP, ultrasound CRL, and implantation that were known, compared to pregnancy duration assigned by day of ovulation.

Methods

Prospective study in 143 women trying to conceive. In 71 ongoing pregnancies, gestational length was estimated from LMP, CRL at 10–14 weeks, ovulation, and implantation day. For each method of GA assignment, the distribution in observed gestational length was derived and both agreement and correlation between the methods determined.

Results

Median ovulation and implantation days were 16 and 27, respectively. The gestational length based on LMP, CRL, implantation, and ovulation was similar: 279, 278, 276.5 and 276.5 days, respectively. The distributions for observed gestational length were widest where GA was assigned from CRL and LMP and narrowest when assigned from implantation and ovulation day. The strongest correlation for gestational length assessment was between ovulation and implantation (r = 0.98) and weakest between CRL and LMP (r = 0.88).

Conclusions

The most accurate method of predicting gestational length is ovulation day, and this agrees closely with implantation day. Prediction of gestational length from CRL and known LMP are both inferior to ovulation and implantation day. This information could have important implications on the routine assignment of gestational age.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Naegele FC (1836) Lehrbuch der GeburtshiIfe fur Hebammen, 3rd edn. Mohr, Heidelberg Naegele FC (1836) Lehrbuch der GeburtshiIfe fur Hebammen, 3rd edn. Mohr, Heidelberg
2.
go back to reference Geirsson RT, Busby-Earle RM (1991) Certain dates may not provide a reliable estimate of gestational age. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 98:108–109CrossRefPubMed Geirsson RT, Busby-Earle RM (1991) Certain dates may not provide a reliable estimate of gestational age. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 98:108–109CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Waller DK, Spears WD, Gu Y, Cunningham GC (2000) Assessing number-specific error in the recall of onset of last menstrual period. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 14(3):263–267CrossRefPubMed Waller DK, Spears WD, Gu Y, Cunningham GC (2000) Assessing number-specific error in the recall of onset of last menstrual period. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 14(3):263–267CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Creinin MD, Keverline S, Meyn LA (2004) How regular is regular? An analysis of menstrual cycle regularity. Contraception 70(4):289–292CrossRefPubMed Creinin MD, Keverline S, Meyn LA (2004) How regular is regular? An analysis of menstrual cycle regularity. Contraception 70(4):289–292CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Johnson SR, Miro F, Barrett S, Ellis JE (2009) Levels of urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) following conception and variability of menstrual cycle length in a cohort of women attempting to conceive. Curr Med Res Opin 25(3):741–748CrossRefPubMed Johnson SR, Miro F, Barrett S, Ellis JE (2009) Levels of urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) following conception and variability of menstrual cycle length in a cohort of women attempting to conceive. Curr Med Res Opin 25(3):741–748CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lenton EA, Landgren BM, Sexton L (1984) Normal variation in the length of the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle: identification of the short luteal phase. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 91(7):685–689CrossRefPubMed Lenton EA, Landgren BM, Sexton L (1984) Normal variation in the length of the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle: identification of the short luteal phase. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 91(7):685–689CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Robinson HP, Fleming JE (1975) A critical evaluation of sonar “crown-rump length” measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 82(9):702–710CrossRefPubMed Robinson HP, Fleming JE (1975) A critical evaluation of sonar “crown-rump length” measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 82(9):702–710CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference NICE (2008) National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Antenatal care: routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. CG62. NICE: London, 2008. National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence, London NICE (2008) National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Antenatal care: routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. CG62. NICE: London, 2008. National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence, London
9.
go back to reference Lynch CD, Zhang J (2007) The research implications of the selection of a gestational age estimation method. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 21(2):86–96CrossRefPubMed Lynch CD, Zhang J (2007) The research implications of the selection of a gestational age estimation method. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 21(2):86–96CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hadlock FP, Shah YP, Kanon DJ, Lindsey JV (1992) Fetal crown-rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5–18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US. Radiology 182(2):501–505CrossRefPubMed Hadlock FP, Shah YP, Kanon DJ, Lindsey JV (1992) Fetal crown-rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5–18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US. Radiology 182(2):501–505CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pexsters A, Daemen A, Bottomley C, Van Schoubroeck D, De Catte L, De Moor B, D’Hooghe T, Lees C, Timmerman D, Bourne T (2010) New crown-rump length curve based on over 3500 pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35(6):650–655CrossRefPubMed Pexsters A, Daemen A, Bottomley C, Van Schoubroeck D, De Catte L, De Moor B, D’Hooghe T, Lees C, Timmerman D, Bourne T (2010) New crown-rump length curve based on over 3500 pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35(6):650–655CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kagan KO, Hoopmann M, Baker A, Huebner M, Abele H, Wright D (2012) Impact of bias in crown-rump length measurement at first-trimester screening for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40(2):135–139CrossRefPubMed Kagan KO, Hoopmann M, Baker A, Huebner M, Abele H, Wright D (2012) Impact of bias in crown-rump length measurement at first-trimester screening for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40(2):135–139CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Baird DD, McConnaughey DR, Weinberg CR, Musey PI, Collins DC, Kesner JS (1995) Application of a method for estimating day of ovulation using urinary estrogen and progesterone metabolites. Epidemiology 6(5):547–550CrossRefPubMed Baird DD, McConnaughey DR, Weinberg CR, Musey PI, Collins DC, Kesner JS (1995) Application of a method for estimating day of ovulation using urinary estrogen and progesterone metabolites. Epidemiology 6(5):547–550CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wilcox AJ, Dunson D, Baird DD (2000) The timing of the “fertile window” in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study. BMJ 321(7271):1259–1262CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilcox AJ, Dunson D, Baird DD (2000) The timing of the “fertile window” in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study. BMJ 321(7271):1259–1262CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Bergsjo P, Denman DW, Hoffman HJ, Meirik O (1990) Duration of human singleton pregnancy. A population-based study. Acta Obstet et Gynecol Scand 69(3):197–207CrossRef Bergsjo P, Denman DW, Hoffman HJ, Meirik O (1990) Duration of human singleton pregnancy. A population-based study. Acta Obstet et Gynecol Scand 69(3):197–207CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Johnson S, Shaw R, Parkinson P, Ellis J, Buchanan P, Zinaman M (2011) Home pregnancy test compared to standard-of-care ultrasound dating in the assessment of pregnancy duration. Curr Med Res Opin 27(2):393–401CrossRefPubMed Johnson S, Shaw R, Parkinson P, Ellis J, Buchanan P, Zinaman M (2011) Home pregnancy test compared to standard-of-care ultrasound dating in the assessment of pregnancy duration. Curr Med Res Opin 27(2):393–401CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Royston JP (1982) Basal body temperature, ovulation and the risk of conception, with special reference to the lifetimes of sperm and egg. Biometrics 38(2):397–406CrossRefPubMed Royston JP (1982) Basal body temperature, ovulation and the risk of conception, with special reference to the lifetimes of sperm and egg. Biometrics 38(2):397–406CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD (1995) Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. N Engl J Med 333(23):1517–1521CrossRefPubMed Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD (1995) Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. N Engl J Med 333(23):1517–1521CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Weinberg CR (1999) Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 340(23):1796–1799CrossRefPubMed Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Weinberg CR (1999) Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 340(23):1796–1799CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Mahendru AA, Daemen A, Everett TR, Wilkinson IB, McEniery CM, Abdallah Y, Timmerman D, Bourne T, Lees CC (2012) Impact of ovulation and implantation timing on first-trimester crown-rump length and gestational age. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40(6):630–635CrossRefPubMed Mahendru AA, Daemen A, Everett TR, Wilkinson IB, McEniery CM, Abdallah Y, Timmerman D, Bourne T, Lees CC (2012) Impact of ovulation and implantation timing on first-trimester crown-rump length and gestational age. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40(6):630–635CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Miller PB, Soules MR (1996) The usefulness of a urinary LH kit for ovulation prediction during menstrual cycles of normal women. Obstet Gynecol 87(1):13–17CrossRefPubMed Miller PB, Soules MR (1996) The usefulness of a urinary LH kit for ovulation prediction during menstrual cycles of normal women. Obstet Gynecol 87(1):13–17CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Chard T (1992) Pregnancy tests: a review. Hum Reprod 7(5):701–710PubMed Chard T (1992) Pregnancy tests: a review. Hum Reprod 7(5):701–710PubMed
23.
go back to reference Lenton EA, Neal LM, Sulaiman R (1982) Plasma concentrations of human chorionic gonadotropin from the time of implantation until the second week of pregnancy. Fertil Steril 37(6):773–778CrossRefPubMed Lenton EA, Neal LM, Sulaiman R (1982) Plasma concentrations of human chorionic gonadotropin from the time of implantation until the second week of pregnancy. Fertil Steril 37(6):773–778CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Jukic AM, Baird DD, Weinberg CR, McConnaughey DR, Wilcox AJ (2013) Length of human pregnancy and contributors to its natural variation. Hum Reprod 28(10):2848–2855CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jukic AM, Baird DD, Weinberg CR, McConnaughey DR, Wilcox AJ (2013) Length of human pregnancy and contributors to its natural variation. Hum Reprod 28(10):2848–2855CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Gardosi J (2011) Fetal growth standards: individual and global perspectives. Lancet 377(9780):1812–1814CrossRefPubMed Gardosi J (2011) Fetal growth standards: individual and global perspectives. Lancet 377(9780):1812–1814CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Larsen J, Buchanan P, Johnson S, Godbert S, Zinaman M (2013) Human chorionic gonadotropin as a measure of pregnancy duration. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 123(3):189–195CrossRefPubMed Larsen J, Buchanan P, Johnson S, Godbert S, Zinaman M (2013) Human chorionic gonadotropin as a measure of pregnancy duration. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 123(3):189–195CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Mook-Kanamori DO, Steegers EA, Eilers PH, Raat H, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW (2010) Risk factors and outcomes associated with first-trimester fetal growth restriction. JAMA 303(6):527–534CrossRefPubMed Mook-Kanamori DO, Steegers EA, Eilers PH, Raat H, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW (2010) Risk factors and outcomes associated with first-trimester fetal growth restriction. JAMA 303(6):527–534CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Axell RG, Gillett A, Pasupathy D, Chudleigh T, Brockelsby J, White PA, Lees CC (2014) Accuracy of nuchal translucency measurement depends on equipment used and its calibration. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 44(1):31–37CrossRefPubMed Axell RG, Gillett A, Pasupathy D, Chudleigh T, Brockelsby J, White PA, Lees CC (2014) Accuracy of nuchal translucency measurement depends on equipment used and its calibration. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 44(1):31–37CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Kalish RB, Thaler HT, Chasen ST, Gupta M, Berman SJ, Rosenwaks Z, Chervenak FA (2004) First- and second-trimester ultrasound assessment of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(3):975–978CrossRefPubMed Kalish RB, Thaler HT, Chasen ST, Gupta M, Berman SJ, Rosenwaks Z, Chervenak FA (2004) First- and second-trimester ultrasound assessment of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(3):975–978CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Volleberg JH, Jongsma HW, van Dongen PW (1989) The accuracy of ultrasonic measurement of fetal crown-rump length. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 30(3):253–256CrossRef Volleberg JH, Jongsma HW, van Dongen PW (1989) The accuracy of ultrasonic measurement of fetal crown-rump length. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 30(3):253–256CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Verburg BO, Steegers EA, De Ridder M, Snijders RJ, Smith E, Hofman A, Moll HA, Jaddoe VW, Witteman JC (2008) New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31(4):388–396CrossRefPubMed Verburg BO, Steegers EA, De Ridder M, Snijders RJ, Smith E, Hofman A, Moll HA, Jaddoe VW, Witteman JC (2008) New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31(4):388–396CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Piantelli G, Sacchini C, Coltri A, Ludovici G, Paita Y, Gramellini D (1994) Ultrasound dating-curve analysis in the assessment of gestational age. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 21(2):108–118PubMed Piantelli G, Sacchini C, Coltri A, Ludovici G, Paita Y, Gramellini D (1994) Ultrasound dating-curve analysis in the assessment of gestational age. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 21(2):108–118PubMed
34.
go back to reference ACOG Ultrasonography in pregnancy (2009) ACOG Practice Bulletin No 101. Obstet Gynecol 123:451–461 ACOG Ultrasonography in pregnancy (2009) ACOG Practice Bulletin No 101. Obstet Gynecol 123:451–461
35.
go back to reference Behre HM, Kuhlage J, Gassner C, Sonntag B, Schem C, Schneider HP, Nieschlag E (2000) Prediction of ovulation by urinary hormone measurements with the home use ClearPlan Fertility Monitor: comparison with transvaginal ultrasound scans and serum hormone measurements. Hum Reprod 15(12):2478–2482CrossRefPubMed Behre HM, Kuhlage J, Gassner C, Sonntag B, Schem C, Schneider HP, Nieschlag E (2000) Prediction of ovulation by urinary hormone measurements with the home use ClearPlan Fertility Monitor: comparison with transvaginal ultrasound scans and serum hormone measurements. Hum Reprod 15(12):2478–2482CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Gestational length assignment based on last menstrual period, first trimester crown-rump length, ovulation, and implantation timing
Authors
Amita A. Mahendru
Charlotte S. Wilhelm-Benartzi
Ian B. Wilkinson
Carmel M. McEniery
Sarah Johnson
Christoph Lees
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4153-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2016 Go to the issue