Top

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Published in:

01-10-2016 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Correlation of fetal scalp blood sampling pH with neonatal outcome umbilical artery pH value

Authors: E. Kuehnle, S. Herms, F. Kohls, S. Kundu, P. Hillemanns, Ismini Staboulidou

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2016

Abstract

Purpose

Fetal scalp blood sampling is considered as a complimentary tool in addition to cardiotocography to assess fetal well-being. This blood sampling is important as the obstetrician has to judge and make decisions regarding the further management of the delivery based on this pH result. The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between fetal scalp blood pH and the umbilical artery pH after birth. Furthermore, it was investigated whether tocolysis, a performed episiotomy or cord encirclement have an influence on the umbilical artery pH.

Methods

This retrospective study over a period of 11 years included all singleton pregnancies without fetal anomalies, which were monitored by fetal scalp blood sampling during labor.

Results

844 out of 1502 deliveries were included for analysis. The analysis demonstrates a good correlation between fetal scalp pH value and outcome pH value. Subgroup analysis with fetal scalp blood pH <7.20 showed a difference in 40 of 82 cases, with an outcome pH value ≥7.20, but this difference was statistically insignificant. Neither did tocolysis, episiotomy or the presence of cord encirclement show an overall effect, nor did they have an impact on the subgroup.

Conclusion

Obstetricians must consider that the values of fetal scalp blood are not always reliable and can be false. However, on the basis of CTG and fetal scalp blood pH, decisions are made regarding delivery interventions. Therefore, we would encourage the consideration of taking two samples routinely at every attempt of fetal blood sampling.

Jorgensen JS, Weber T (2014) Fetal scalp blood sampling in labor: a review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93:548–555CrossRefPubMed

East CE, Leader LR, Sheehan P, Henshall NE, Colditz PB, Lau R (2015) Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate trace. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:5

Wiberg-Itzel E, Lipponer C, Norman M, Herbst A, Prebensen D, Hansson A et al (2008) Determination of pH or lactate in fetal scalp blood in management of intrapartum fetal distress: randomised controlled multicentre trial. BMJ 336:1284–1287CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Westerhuis ME, van Horen E, Kwee A, van der Tweel I, Visser GH, Moons KG (2009) Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN. BJOG 116:545–551CrossRefPubMed

Devane D, Lalor J (2005) Midwives’ visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement. J Adv Nurs 52:133–141CrossRefPubMed

Epstein AJ, Twogood S, Lee RH, Opper N, Beavis A, Miller DA (2013) Interobserver reliability of fetal heart rate pattern interpretation using NICHD definitions. Am J Perinatol 30:463–468PubMed

Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Pereira-Leite L (1999) Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:1307–1310CrossRefPubMed

Rhöse S, Heinis AMF, Vandenbussche F, van Drongelen J, van Dillen J (2014) Inter- and intra-observer agreement of nonreassuring cardiotocography analysis and subsequent clinical management. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93:596–602CrossRefPubMed

Haverkamp AD, Orleans M, Langendoerfer S, McFee J, Murphy J, Thompson HE (1979) A controlled trial of the differential effect of intrapartum fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 134:399–409PubMed

10.

Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM (2013) Continuous CTG as a form of electronic fetal monitoring for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006066. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub2

11.

Weber T (1982) CTG supplemented with continuous fetal pH monitoring during labour. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 61:351–355PubMed

12.

East CE, Leader LR, Sheehan P, Henshall NE, Colditz PB (2010) Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate trace. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD006174PubMed

13.

Sherman DJ, Arieli S, Raziel A, Bukovsky I (1994) The effect of sampling technique on measurement of fetal blood pH and gases: an in vitro system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:1125–1128CrossRefPubMed

14.

Morgan BLG, Chao CR, Iyer V, Ross MG (2002) Correlation between fetal scalp blood samples and intravascular blood pH, pO₂ and oxygen saturation measurements. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 11:325–328CrossRefPubMed

15.

Parer JT (1980) The current role of intrapartum fetal blood sampling. Clin Obstet Gynecol 23:565–582CrossRefPubMed

16.

Mahendru AA, Lees CC (2011) Is intrapartum fetal blood sampling a gold standard diagnostic tool for fetal distress? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 156:137–139CrossRefPubMed

17.

O’Brian YM, Murphy DJ (2013) The reliability of fetal blood sampling as a test of fetal acidosis in labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 167:142–145CrossRef

18.

Liljestrom L, Wikstrom AK, Hanson U, Akerud H, Jonsson M (2011) Evaluation of the discrepancy between pH and lactate in combined fetal scalp blood sampling. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90:1088–1093CrossRefPubMed

19.

Chandraharan E, Wiberg N (2014) Fetal scalp blood sampling during labor: an appraisal of the physiological basis and scientific evidence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93:544–547CrossRefPubMed

20.

Funk A, Heyl W, Rother R, Winkler M, Rath W (1995) Subpartale Diagnose von Nabelschnurumschlingungen mittels farbcodierter Dopplersonographie und Korrelation zu kardiotokographischen Veränderungen während des Geburtsverlaufes. Geburtsh u Frauenheilk 55:623–627CrossRef

21.

Bogdan C, Meyer C, Rϋttgers H, Kubli F (1971) Die Azidosegefährdung des Fetus bei Nabelschnurumschlingung. Schweiz Z Gynäk Geburtsh 2:441–444

22.

Bruce S, James SL, Bowe E, Rey H, Shamsi H (1978) Umbilical cord complications as a cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. J Perinat Med 6:89–94CrossRefPubMed

23.

Spellacy WN, Gravem H, Fisch RO (1966) The umbilical cord complications of true knots, nuchal coils, and cords around the body. Report from the collaborative study of cerebral palsy. Am J Obset Gynecol 94:1136–1142CrossRef

24.

Larson LD, Rayburn WF, Crosby S, Thurnau GR (1995) Multiple nuchal cord entanglements and intrapartum complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:1228–1231CrossRefPubMed

25.

Jauniaux E, Ramsay B, Peellaerts C, Scholler Y (1995) Perinatal features of pregnancies complicated by nuchal cord. Am J Perinatol 12:255–258CrossRefPubMed

26.

Ertan AK, Schmidt W (1994) Nabelschnurumschlingung und farbcodierte Doppler-Sonographie. Geburtsh u Frauenheilk 54:196–203CrossRef

27.

Sornes T (1995) Umbilical cord encirclements and fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 86:725–728CrossRefPubMed

28.

Osak R, Webster KM, Bocking AD, Campbell MK, Richardson BS (1997) Nuchal cord evident at birth impacts on fetal size relative to that of the placenta. Early Hum Dev 49:193–202CrossRefPubMed

29.

Clapp JF 3rd, Stepanchak W, Hashimoto K, Ehrenberg H, Lopez B (2003) The natural history of antenatal nuchal cords. Am J Obstet Gyencol 189:488–493CrossRef

30.

Schäffer L, Burkhardt T, Zimmermann R, Kurmanavicius J (2005) Nuchal cords in term and postterm deliveries- do we need to know? Obstet Gyencol 106:23–28CrossRef

31.

Martin GC, Green RS, Holzman IR (2005) Acidosis in newborns with nuchal cords and normal APGAR scores. J Perinatol 25:162–165CrossRefPubMed

32.

Önderogly LS, Dursun P, Durukan T (2008) Perinatal features and umbilical cord blood gases in newborns complicated with nuchal cord. Turk J Pediatr 50:466–470

33.

Sadan O, Fleischfarb Z, Everon S, Golan A, Lurie S (2007) Cord around the neck: should it be severed at delivery? A randomized controlled study. Am J Perinatol 24:61–64CrossRefPubMed

34.

Yeomans ER, Hauth JC, Gilstrap EC, Strickland DM (1985) Umbilical cord pH, pCO₂ and bicarbonate following uncomplicated term vaginal deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151:798–800CrossRefPubMed

35.

Carey JC, Rayburn WF (2003) Nuchal cord encirclements and birth weight. J Reprod Med 48:460–462PubMed

36.

Yeh P, Emary K, Impey L (2012) The relationship between umbilical cord arterial pH and serious adverse neonatal outcome: analysis of 51519 consecutive validated samples. BJOG 119:824–831CrossRefPubMed

37.

Chandraharan E (2014) Fetal scalp blodd sampling during labour: is it a useful diagnostic test or a historical test that no longer has a place in modern clinical obstetrics? BJOG 121:1056–1062CrossRefPubMed

Title: Correlation of fetal scalp blood sampling pH with neonatal outcome umbilical artery pH value
Authors: E. Kuehnle
S. Herms
F. Kohls
S. Kundu
P. Hillemanns
Ismini Staboulidou
Publication date: 01-10-2016
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4053-6

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Correlation of fetal scalp blood sampling pH with neonatal outcome umbilical artery pH value

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Uterine folding hemostasis: a simpler and safer technique for controlling atonic postpartum hemorrhage

Predelivery maternal fibrinogen as a predictor of blood loss after vaginal delivery

Peritoneal closure during laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy

Sexual function and quality of life in gynecological cancer pre- and post-short-term brachytherapy: a prospective study

Vitamin K3 induces antiproliferative effect in cervical epithelial cells transformed by HPV 16 (SiHa cells) through the increase in reactive oxygen species production

Introducing a new scoring system for pap smear in the detection of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in pregnancy (The Luebeck Score)