Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2016

01-08-2016 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

New osseous soft markers for trisomy 13, 18 and 21

Authors: Annika Achter, Thomas Hager, Rolf Fimmers, Ulrich Gembruch, Annette M. Müller

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

For ultrasonographic diagnosis of a fetal trisomy so-called “soft markers” (=ultrasonographically detectable morphological variants) are used. Detection of a certain number of them increases the diagnostic certainty of a fetal trisomy. Up to now there are very few diagnostically accepted osseous soft markers for trisomy. Hence potential osseous soft markers applicable for first and second trimester ultrasound screening for trisomy 21, 18 or 13 were studied.

Methods

Postmortal fetal X-rays (ap, lateral) of 358 fetuses (trisomy 21: n = 109, trisomy 18: n = 46; trisomy 13: n = 38, control group: n = 165).

Results

Not yet described but with trisomy 21 statistically associated soft markers were un-timely os sternale ossification, delayed os sacrum ossification, shortened os maxillare, reduced os maxillare-jaw-corner distance, augmented orbita height, premature os calcaneus ossification, bell-shaped thorax, coronal clefts, trend to wider binocular as well as wider intraocular distances; for trisomy 18: elevated clavicula slope, reduced number of ribs, bell-shaped thorax, coronal clefts, reduced os maxillare-jaw-corner distance, shortened ramus mandibulare, shortened os metacarpale IV and V, augmented ratio between biparietal diameter and (osseus and soft-tissue) shoulder width; for trisomy 13: longer os nasale, elevated clavicula slope, premature sternum, delayed os sacrum ossification, delayed/premature cranium ossification, reduced number of ribs, coronal clefts, reduced os maxillare-jaw-corner distance, shortened ramus mandibulare, augmented orbita height, shortened os metacarpale V and a tendency for a shortened os metacarpale IV.

Conclusion

We found several not yet published osseous soft markers statistically associated with trisomy 21, 18 and 13, which can help to ensure sonographically these aneuploidy diagnoses.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Agathokleous M, Chaveeva P, Poon LC, Kosinski P, Nicolaides KH (2013) Meta-analysis of second-trimester markers for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 41(3):247–261CrossRefPubMed Agathokleous M, Chaveeva P, Poon LC, Kosinski P, Nicolaides KH (2013) Meta-analysis of second-trimester markers for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 41(3):247–261CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Benn P, Borell A, Chiu R, Cuckle H, Dugoff L, Faas B, Gross S, Johnson J, Maymon R, Norton M, Odibo A, Schielen P, Spencer K, Huang T, Wright D, Yaron Y (2013) Position statement from the Aneuploidy Screening Committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 33(7):622–629. doi:10.1002/pd.4139 (Epub 2013 May 21)CrossRefPubMed Benn P, Borell A, Chiu R, Cuckle H, Dugoff L, Faas B, Gross S, Johnson J, Maymon R, Norton M, Odibo A, Schielen P, Spencer K, Huang T, Wright D, Yaron Y (2013) Position statement from the Aneuploidy Screening Committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 33(7):622–629. doi:10.​1002/​pd.​4139 (Epub 2013 May 21)CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Borenstein M, Persico N, Kagan KO, Gazzoni A, Nicolaides KH (2008) Frontomaxillary facial angle in screening for trisomy 21 at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32(1):5–11CrossRefPubMed Borenstein M, Persico N, Kagan KO, Gazzoni A, Nicolaides KH (2008) Frontomaxillary facial angle in screening for trisomy 21 at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32(1):5–11CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cicero S, Curcio P, Papageorghiou A, Sonek J, Nicolaides K (2001) Absence of nasal bone in fetuses with trisomy 21 at 11–14 weeks of gestation: an observational study. Lancet 358(9294):1665–1667CrossRefPubMed Cicero S, Curcio P, Papageorghiou A, Sonek J, Nicolaides K (2001) Absence of nasal bone in fetuses with trisomy 21 at 11–14 weeks of gestation: an observational study. Lancet 358(9294):1665–1667CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cicero S, Sonek JD, McKenna DS, Croom CS, Johnson L, Nicolaides KH (2003) Nasal bone hypoplasia in trisomy 21 at 15–22 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21(1):15–18CrossRefPubMed Cicero S, Sonek JD, McKenna DS, Croom CS, Johnson L, Nicolaides KH (2003) Nasal bone hypoplasia in trisomy 21 at 15–22 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21(1):15–18CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Doberentz E, Schumacher R, Gembruch U, Gasser JA, Müller AM (2013) Coronal vertebral clefts: a radiological indicator for chromosomal aberrations. Pediatr Dev Pathol 16(1):1–6CrossRefPubMed Doberentz E, Schumacher R, Gembruch U, Gasser JA, Müller AM (2013) Coronal vertebral clefts: a radiological indicator for chromosomal aberrations. Pediatr Dev Pathol 16(1):1–6CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Edwards DK 3rd, Berry CC, Hilton SW (1988) Trisomy 21 in newborn infants: chest radiographic diagnosis. Radiology 167(2):317–318CrossRefPubMed Edwards DK 3rd, Berry CC, Hilton SW (1988) Trisomy 21 in newborn infants: chest radiographic diagnosis. Radiology 167(2):317–318CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lee W, Balasubramaniam M, Yeo L, Hassan SS, Gotsch F, Kusanovic JP, Gonçalves LF, Romero R (2010) Iliac crest angle: a novel sonographic parameter for the prediction of Down syndrome risk during the second trimester of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35(2):163–171CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee W, Balasubramaniam M, Yeo L, Hassan SS, Gotsch F, Kusanovic JP, Gonçalves LF, Romero R (2010) Iliac crest angle: a novel sonographic parameter for the prediction of Down syndrome risk during the second trimester of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35(2):163–171CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Maymon R, Tovbin Y, Dreazen E, Weinraub Z, Herman A (2004) All five digits of the hands of fetuses with down syndrome are short. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23(6):557–560CrossRefPubMed Maymon R, Tovbin Y, Dreazen E, Weinraub Z, Herman A (2004) All five digits of the hands of fetuses with down syndrome are short. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23(6):557–560CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Narasimhan K, Lin SL, Tong T, Baig S, Ho S, Sukumar P, Biswas A, Hahn S, Bajic VB, Choolani M (2013) Maternal serum protein profile and immune response protein subunits as markers for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21, 18, and 13. Prenat Diagn 33(3):223–231CrossRefPubMed Narasimhan K, Lin SL, Tong T, Baig S, Ho S, Sukumar P, Biswas A, Hahn S, Bajic VB, Choolani M (2013) Maternal serum protein profile and immune response protein subunits as markers for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21, 18, and 13. Prenat Diagn 33(3):223–231CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Norton ME, Jacobsson B, Swamy GK, Laurent LC, Ranzini AC, Brar H, Tomlinson MW, Pereira L, Spitz JL, Hollemon D, Cuckle H, Musci TJ, Wapner RJ (2015) Cell-free DNA analysis for noninvasive examination of trisomy. N Engl J Med 372(17):1589–1597. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1407349 (Epub 2015 Apr 1)CrossRefPubMed Norton ME, Jacobsson B, Swamy GK, Laurent LC, Ranzini AC, Brar H, Tomlinson MW, Pereira L, Spitz JL, Hollemon D, Cuckle H, Musci TJ, Wapner RJ (2015) Cell-free DNA analysis for noninvasive examination of trisomy. N Engl J Med 372(17):1589–1597. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa1407349 (Epub 2015 Apr 1)CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rice KJ, Ballas J, Lai E, Hartney C, Jones MC, Pretorius DH (2011) Diagnosis of fetal limb abnormalities before 15 weeks: cause for concern. J Ultrasound Med 30(7):1009–1019PubMed Rice KJ, Ballas J, Lai E, Hartney C, Jones MC, Pretorius DH (2011) Diagnosis of fetal limb abnormalities before 15 weeks: cause for concern. J Ultrasound Med 30(7):1009–1019PubMed
13.
go back to reference Sayin NC, Canda MT, Ahmet N, Arda S, Süt N, Varol FG (2008) The association of triple-marker test results with adverse pregnancy outcomes in low-risk pregnancies with healthy newborns. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277(1):47–53CrossRefPubMed Sayin NC, Canda MT, Ahmet N, Arda S, Süt N, Varol FG (2008) The association of triple-marker test results with adverse pregnancy outcomes in low-risk pregnancies with healthy newborns. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277(1):47–53CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Schumacher R, Seaver LH, Spanger J (2010) Fetal radiology: a diagnostic atlas; with 113 figures and 238 individual illustrations and 51 tables, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 212SCrossRef Schumacher R, Seaver LH, Spanger J (2010) Fetal radiology: a diagnostic atlas; with 113 figures and 238 individual illustrations and 51 tables, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 212SCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Unsal N, Ozat M, Kanat-Pektas M, Gungor T, Danisman N (2011) The significance of fetal maxillary length in the first trimester screening for trisomy 21. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283(6):1199–1205CrossRefPubMed Unsal N, Ozat M, Kanat-Pektas M, Gungor T, Danisman N (2011) The significance of fetal maxillary length in the first trimester screening for trisomy 21. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283(6):1199–1205CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
New osseous soft markers for trisomy 13, 18 and 21
Authors
Annika Achter
Thomas Hager
Rolf Fimmers
Ulrich Gembruch
Annette M. Müller
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3971-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2016 Go to the issue