Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2016

01-02-2016 | General Gynecology

Development of obstetrical and gynecological journals, 2007 to 2013: a trend analysis

Authors: Christian M. Domröse, Mignon-Denise Keyver-Paik, Henning Lorenzen, Walther C. Kuhn, Michael R. Mallmann

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the trends and developments among journals in the specialty of obstetrics and gynecology.

Methods

Using the Journal Citation Reports from 2007 to 2013, we analyzed the impact factor (IF), Eigenfactor® Score (ES), and Article Influence® Score (AIS) of 43 journals in the field of obstetrics and gynecology published in this time period.

Results

From 78 journals of the Journal Citation Report 2013, 43 were selected for this study. The mean IF grew from 1.68 ± 0.97 in 2007 to 2.12 ± 1.05 in 2013, the ES from 0.0113 ± 0.0169 to 0.0114 ± 0.0140, and the AIS from 0.513 ± 0.302 to 0.663 ± 0.359. Differences in the IF, ES, and AIS between journals from the United States versus Europe could be observed. In most cases, the IF, ES, and AIS increased between 2007 and 2013. Strong correlations could be found between IF, AIS, and ES.

Conclusions

The overall mean IF for obstetrical and gynecological journals increased over the analyzed time period. The IF remains the standard measure to compare scientific journals. It correlates well with two major alternative measures of scientific impact, the ES and especially the AIS. Other measures are evolving and might show superior usage in the future.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Garfield E (1955) Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 122(3159):108–111PubMedCrossRef Garfield E (1955) Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 122(3159):108–111PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kurmis AP (2003) Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(12):2449–2454 Kurmis AP (2003) Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(12):2449–2454
11.
go back to reference Page L (2001) Method for node ranking in a linked database. Google Patents Page L (2001) Method for node ranking in a linked database. Google Patents
14.
go back to reference Brandt JS, Downing AC, Howard DL, Kofinas JD, Chasen ST (2010) Citation classics in obstetrics and gynecology: the 100 most frequently cited journal articles in the last 50 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(4):355, e351–e357. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.025 Brandt JS, Downing AC, Howard DL, Kofinas JD, Chasen ST (2010) Citation classics in obstetrics and gynecology: the 100 most frequently cited journal articles in the last 50 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(4):355, e351–e357. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ajog.​2010.​07.​025
15.
go back to reference Moverley R, Rankin K, McNamara I, Davidson D, Reed M, Sprowson A (2013) Impact factors of orthopaedic journals between 2000 and 2010: trends and comparisons with other surgical specialties. Int Orthop (SICOT) 37(4):561–567. doi:10.1007/s00264-012-1769-1 CrossRef Moverley R, Rankin K, McNamara I, Davidson D, Reed M, Sprowson A (2013) Impact factors of orthopaedic journals between 2000 and 2010: trends and comparisons with other surgical specialties. Int Orthop (SICOT) 37(4):561–567. doi:10.​1007/​s00264-012-1769-1 CrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Elizee PK, Ghassab RK, Raoofi A, Miri SM (2012) The more publication, the higher impact factor: citation analysis of top nine gastroenterology and hepatology journals. Hepat Mon 12(12):e8467. doi:10.5812/hepatmon.8467 Elizee PK, Ghassab RK, Raoofi A, Miri SM (2012) The more publication, the higher impact factor: citation analysis of top nine gastroenterology and hepatology journals. Hepat Mon 12(12):e8467. doi:10.​5812/​hepatmon.​8467
Metadata
Title
Development of obstetrical and gynecological journals, 2007 to 2013: a trend analysis
Authors
Christian M. Domröse
Mignon-Denise Keyver-Paik
Henning Lorenzen
Walther C. Kuhn
Michael R. Mallmann
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3818-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2016 Go to the issue