Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2015

01-12-2015 | Gynecologic Oncology

Correlation between VITOM® videocolposcopy and histopathology for pathognomonic grading criteria

Authors: A. Schneider, C. Rakozy, C. Stolte, P. Bothur-Schäfer, H. Rothe, T. Welcker, N. Choly, A. Roesgen, G. Böhmer

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

“Every colposcopic criterion must be mirrored by histopathology”. We investigated the histomorphologic equivalent of four colposcopic criteria, which are associated with CIN 2 and/or CIN 3 and therefore called pathognomonic.

Patients and methods

We diagnosed inner border sign, ridge sign, rag sign and/or cuffed gland openings using VITOM® videocolposcopy in 255 patients which are consistent with major change. Histopathologic examination included immunohistochemical staining for p16, Ki 67 and stathmin-1 and micro-photographic documentation.

Results

The histopathologic pattern specific for each of the four pathognomonic colposcopic criteria was reproducibly identified: inner border sign showed a sharp demarcation between low- and high-grade CIN, in ridge sign high-grade CIN adjoined directly the squamocolumnar junction, in rag sign, high-grade CIN was detached from stroma, and in cuffed gland openings, the entrance to a gland was rimmed by CIN, respectively. In 255 patients, the leading pathognomonic sign was inner border in 12.1 %, ridge in 34.1 %, rag in 18 %, and cuffed glands in 35.7 %, respectively. Inner border sign, ridge sign, rag sign and/or cuffed gland openings were associated with CIN 2 or 3 in 97, 98, 98 and 98 %, respectively. In 153 out of 255 patients, we found a combination of pathognomonic signs with ridge sign being the most frequent combined criterion (in 21 % of patients as second pathognomonic sign).

Conclusion

The morphology of the four pathognomonic colposcopic criteria, inner border sign, ridge sign, rag sign and cuffed crypt openings, is reproduced in histopathology. These criteria are highly associated with CIN 2 or CIN 3.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bosze P et al (2011) Colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 2012 120:166–172CrossRef Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bosze P et al (2011) Colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 2012 120:166–172CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Scheungraber C, Glutig K, Fechtel B et al (2008) Inner border a specific and significant colposcopic sign for moderate or severe dysplasia (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3). J Low Genit Tract Dis 13:1–4CrossRef Scheungraber C, Glutig K, Fechtel B et al (2008) Inner border a specific and significant colposcopic sign for moderate or severe dysplasia (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3). J Low Genit Tract Dis 13:1–4CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Scheungraber C, Koenig U, Fechtel B et al (2008) The colposcopic feature ridge sign is associated with the presence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 and human papillomavirus 16 in young women. J Low Genit Tract Dis 13:13–16CrossRef Scheungraber C, Koenig U, Fechtel B et al (2008) The colposcopic feature ridge sign is associated with the presence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 and human papillomavirus 16 in young women. J Low Genit Tract Dis 13:13–16CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Vercellino GF, Erdemoglu E, Chiantera V et al (2013) Validity of the colposcopic criteria inner border, ridge sign and rag sign for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 121:624–631CrossRefPubMed Vercellino GF, Erdemoglu E, Chiantera V et al (2013) Validity of the colposcopic criteria inner border, ridge sign and rag sign for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 121:624–631CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dexeus S, Cararach M, Dexeus D et al (2002) The role of colposcopy in modern gynecology. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 23:269–277PubMed Dexeus S, Cararach M, Dexeus D et al (2002) The role of colposcopy in modern gynecology. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 23:269–277PubMed
6.
go back to reference Vercellino GF, Erdemoglu E, Ciantera V et al (2015) Clinical relevance of objectifying colposcopy. Arch Gynecol 291:907–915CrossRef Vercellino GF, Erdemoglu E, Ciantera V et al (2015) Clinical relevance of objectifying colposcopy. Arch Gynecol 291:907–915CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kolstad P (1972) Atlas of colposcopy. Unversitetsforlaget, Oslo Kolstad P (1972) Atlas of colposcopy. Unversitetsforlaget, Oslo
8.
go back to reference Reid R, Scalzi P (1985) Genital warts and cervical cancer VII. An improved colposcopic index for differentiating benign papilloma-viral infections from high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 153:611–618CrossRefPubMed Reid R, Scalzi P (1985) Genital warts and cervical cancer VII. An improved colposcopic index for differentiating benign papilloma-viral infections from high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 153:611–618CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Vercellino GF, Erdemoglu E, Kyeyamwa S et al (2011) Evaluation of the VITOM in digital high-definition video exocolposcopy. J Low Genit Tract Dis 15:292–295CrossRefPubMed Vercellino GF, Erdemoglu E, Kyeyamwa S et al (2011) Evaluation of the VITOM in digital high-definition video exocolposcopy. J Low Genit Tract Dis 15:292–295CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Vercellino GF, Chiantera V, Gaßmann J et al (2012) Prospective comparison of loop excision under colposcopic guidance vs VITOM guidance. GebFra 72:945–948 Vercellino GF, Chiantera V, Gaßmann J et al (2012) Prospective comparison of loop excision under colposcopic guidance vs VITOM guidance. GebFra 72:945–948
11.
go back to reference Crum CP (1993) Papillomavirus-related changes and premalignant and malignant squamous lesions of the uterine cervix. In: Clement PB, Young RH (eds) Tumors and tumorlike lesions of the uterine corpus and cervix. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 51–83 Crum CP (1993) Papillomavirus-related changes and premalignant and malignant squamous lesions of the uterine cervix. In: Clement PB, Young RH (eds) Tumors and tumorlike lesions of the uterine corpus and cervix. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 51–83
12.
go back to reference Bowring J, Strander B, Young M, Evans H, Walker P (2010) The Swede score: evaluation of a scoring system designed to improve the predictive value of colposcopy. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 14(4):301–305CrossRefPubMed Bowring J, Strander B, Young M, Evans H, Walker P (2010) The Swede score: evaluation of a scoring system designed to improve the predictive value of colposcopy. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 14(4):301–305CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ferris DG, Litaker MS, ALTS Group (2006) Prediction of cervical histologic results using an abbreviated Reid Colposcopic Index during ALTS. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(3):704–710CrossRefPubMed Ferris DG, Litaker MS, ALTS Group (2006) Prediction of cervical histologic results using an abbreviated Reid Colposcopic Index during ALTS. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(3):704–710CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Pretorius RG, Zhang WH, Belinson JL et al (2004) Colposcopically directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:430–434CrossRefPubMed Pretorius RG, Zhang WH, Belinson JL et al (2004) Colposcopically directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:430–434CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gage C, Hanson VW, Abbey K et al (2006) Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 108:264–272CrossRefPubMed Gage C, Hanson VW, Abbey K et al (2006) Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 108:264–272CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nam K, Chung S, Kwak J et al (2010) Random biopsy after colposcopy-directed biopsy improves the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse. J Low Genit Tract Dis 14:346–351CrossRefPubMed Nam K, Chung S, Kwak J et al (2010) Random biopsy after colposcopy-directed biopsy improves the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse. J Low Genit Tract Dis 14:346–351CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Cantor SB, Cardenas-Turanzas M, Cox DD et al (2008) Accuracy of colposcopy in the diagnostic setting compared with the screening setting. Obstet Gynecol 111:7–14CrossRefPubMed Cantor SB, Cardenas-Turanzas M, Cox DD et al (2008) Accuracy of colposcopy in the diagnostic setting compared with the screening setting. Obstet Gynecol 111:7–14CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Huh WK, Sideri M, Stoler M, Zhang G, Feldman R, Behrens CM (2014) Relevance of random biopsy at the transformation zone when colposcopy is negative. Obstet Gynecol 124:670–678CrossRefPubMed Huh WK, Sideri M, Stoler M, Zhang G, Feldman R, Behrens CM (2014) Relevance of random biopsy at the transformation zone when colposcopy is negative. Obstet Gynecol 124:670–678CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wentzensen N, Walker JL, Gold MA et al (2015) Multiple biopsies and detection of cervical cancer precursors at colposcopy. J Clin Oncol 33:83–89CrossRefPubMed Wentzensen N, Walker JL, Gold MA et al (2015) Multiple biopsies and detection of cervical cancer precursors at colposcopy. J Clin Oncol 33:83–89CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kelly RS, Walker P, Kitchener H, Moss SM (2012) Incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse in colposcopy-negative/human papillomavirus-positive women with low-grade cytological abnormalities. BJOG 119(1):20–25CrossRefPubMed Kelly RS, Walker P, Kitchener H, Moss SM (2012) Incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse in colposcopy-negative/human papillomavirus-positive women with low-grade cytological abnormalities. BJOG 119(1):20–25CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Massad LS, Jeronimo J, Katki HA et al (2011) The accuracy of colposcopic grading for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Low Genit Tract Dis 13:137–144CrossRef Massad LS, Jeronimo J, Katki HA et al (2011) The accuracy of colposcopic grading for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Low Genit Tract Dis 13:137–144CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Correlation between VITOM® videocolposcopy and histopathology for pathognomonic grading criteria
Authors
A. Schneider
C. Rakozy
C. Stolte
P. Bothur-Schäfer
H. Rothe
T. Welcker
N. Choly
A. Roesgen
G. Böhmer
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3798-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2015 Go to the issue