Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2015

01-07-2015 | Gynecologic Oncology

Tumor size is an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis and survival in early stage endometrioid endometrial cancer

Authors: Haider Mahdi, Adnan R. Munkarah, Rouba Ali-Fehmi, Jessica Woessner, Shetal N. Shah, Mehdi Moslemi-Kebria

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective(s)

To analyze the impact of tumor size (TS) on risk of lymph node metastasis (PLN) and prognosis in endometrioid endometrial cancer grossly confined to the uterus (EEC).

Method(s)

Patients with EEC grossly confined to the uterus were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset from 1988 to 2007. Only surgically treated patients were included. TS was analyzed as a continuous and categorical variable (TS ≤ 2 cm, >2–5 cm and >5 cm). Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used.

Result(s)

19,692 patients met the inclusion criteria. In patients with TS ≤ 2 cm, only 2.7 % (88/3,244) had PLN; this increased to 5.8 % (372/6,355) with TS > 2–5 cm and 11.1 % (195/1,745) with TS > 5 cm. The odds of PLN increased by 14 % for each 1 cm increase in TS after controlling for age, race, depth of myometrial invasion and grade (HR 1.14, 95 % CI 1.10–1.19, p < 0.001). Further, TS was an independent predictor of disease-specific survival (DSS) even after adjusting for age, race, grade, depth of myometrial invasion, lymph node status and adjuvant radiation therapy (HR 1.13 for each 1 cm increment in TS, 95 % 1.08–1.18, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, larger TS (>5 cm) was significantly associated with worse DSS (HR 2.09, 95 % 1.31–3.35, p = 0.002); however, there was no significant difference between TS > 2–5 cm versus ≤2 cm (HR 1.25, 95 % 0.85–1.83, p = 0.25). The impact of TS remained significant on DSS in subset of patients who underwent lymphadenectomy with negative lymph nodes.

Conclusion(s)

TS was an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis and disease-specific survival in patients with EEC grossly confined to the uterus. Tumor >5 cm was a predictor of disease-specific survival but no difference in outcome was noted between tumor >2–5 cm and tumor ≤2 cm.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A (2011) Cancer statistics, the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin 61:212–236CrossRefPubMed Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A (2011) Cancer statistics, the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin 61:212–236CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Homesley HD, Graham JE, Heller PB (1987) Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer 60:2035–2041CrossRefPubMed Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Homesley HD, Graham JE, Heller PB (1987) Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer 60:2035–2041CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lampe B, Kurzl R, Hantschmann P (1994) Prognostic factors that predict pelvic lymph node metastasis from endometrial carcinoma. Cancer 74:2502–2508CrossRefPubMed Lampe B, Kurzl R, Hantschmann P (1994) Prognostic factors that predict pelvic lymph node metastasis from endometrial carcinoma. Cancer 74:2502–2508CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schink JC, Rademaker AW, Miller DS, Lurain JR (1991) Tumor size in endometrial cancer. Cancer 67:2791–2794CrossRefPubMed Schink JC, Rademaker AW, Miller DS, Lurain JR (1991) Tumor size in endometrial cancer. Cancer 67:2791–2794CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Burghardt E, Pickel H (1978) Local spread and lymph node involvement in cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 52:138–145PubMed Burghardt E, Pickel H (1978) Local spread and lymph node involvement in cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 52:138–145PubMed
6.
go back to reference Elledge RM, McGuire WL, Osborne CK (1992) Prognostic factors in breast cancer. Semin Oncol 19:244–253PubMed Elledge RM, McGuire WL, Osborne CK (1992) Prognostic factors in breast cancer. Semin Oncol 19:244–253PubMed
7.
go back to reference Scoll BJ, Wong YN, Egleston BL, Kunkle DA, Saad IR, Uzzo RG (2009) Age, tumor size and relative survival of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: a surveillance, epidemiology and end results analysis. J Urol 181:506–511CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Scoll BJ, Wong YN, Egleston BL, Kunkle DA, Saad IR, Uzzo RG (2009) Age, tumor size and relative survival of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: a surveillance, epidemiology and end results analysis. J Urol 181:506–511CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
8.
go back to reference Nguyen MM, Gill IS (2009) Effect of renal cancer size on the prevalence of metastasis at diagnosis and mortality. J Urol 181:1020–1027 (discussion 1027)CrossRefPubMed Nguyen MM, Gill IS (2009) Effect of renal cancer size on the prevalence of metastasis at diagnosis and mortality. J Urol 181:1020–1027 (discussion 1027)CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gusberg SB, Jones HC Jr, Tovell HM (1960) Selection of treatment for corpus cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 80:374–380PubMed Gusberg SB, Jones HC Jr, Tovell HM (1960) Selection of treatment for corpus cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 80:374–380PubMed
10.
go back to reference Mariani A, Webb MJ, Keeney GL, Haddock MG, Calori G, Podratz KC (2000) Low-risk corpus cancer: is lymphadenectomy or radiotherapy necessary? Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1506–1519CrossRefPubMed Mariani A, Webb MJ, Keeney GL, Haddock MG, Calori G, Podratz KC (2000) Low-risk corpus cancer: is lymphadenectomy or radiotherapy necessary? Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1506–1519CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Schink JC, Lurain JR, Wallemark CB, Chmiel JS (1987) Tumor size in endometrial cancer: a prognostic factor for lymph node metastasis. Obstet Gynecol 70:216–219PubMed Schink JC, Lurain JR, Wallemark CB, Chmiel JS (1987) Tumor size in endometrial cancer: a prognostic factor for lymph node metastasis. Obstet Gynecol 70:216–219PubMed
12.
go back to reference Mariani A, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, Gostout BS, Jones MB, Wilson TO, Podratz KC (2008) Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm shift in surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol 109:11–18CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Mariani A, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, Gostout BS, Jones MB, Wilson TO, Podratz KC (2008) Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm shift in surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol 109:11–18CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lurain JR, Rice BL, Rademaker AW, Poggensee LE, Schink JC, Miller DS (1991) Prognostic factors associated with recurrence in clinical stage I adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Obstet Gynecol 78:63–69PubMed Lurain JR, Rice BL, Rademaker AW, Poggensee LE, Schink JC, Miller DS (1991) Prognostic factors associated with recurrence in clinical stage I adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Obstet Gynecol 78:63–69PubMed
14.
go back to reference Shah C, Johnson EB, Everett E, Tamimi H, Greer B, Swisher E, Goff B (2005) Does size matter? Tumor size and morphology as predictors of nodal status and recurrence in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 99:564–570CrossRefPubMed Shah C, Johnson EB, Everett E, Tamimi H, Greer B, Swisher E, Goff B (2005) Does size matter? Tumor size and morphology as predictors of nodal status and recurrence in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 99:564–570CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Creasman W (2009) Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105:109CrossRefPubMed Creasman W (2009) Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105:109CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Soliman PT, Frumovitz M, Spannuth W, Greer MJ, Sharma S, Schmeler KM, Ramirez PT, Levenback CF, Ramondetta LM (2010) Lymphadenectomy during endometrial cancer staging: practice patterns among gynecologic oncologists. Gynecol Oncol 119:291–294CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Soliman PT, Frumovitz M, Spannuth W, Greer MJ, Sharma S, Schmeler KM, Ramirez PT, Levenback CF, Ramondetta LM (2010) Lymphadenectomy during endometrial cancer staging: practice patterns among gynecologic oncologists. Gynecol Oncol 119:291–294CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kumar S, Bandyopadhyay S, Semaan A, Shah JP, Mahdi H, Morris R, Munkarah A, Ali-Fehmi R (2011) The role of frozen section in surgical staging of low risk endometrial cancer. PLoS One 6:e21912CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Kumar S, Bandyopadhyay S, Semaan A, Shah JP, Mahdi H, Morris R, Munkarah A, Ali-Fehmi R (2011) The role of frozen section in surgical staging of low risk endometrial cancer. PLoS One 6:e21912CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
18.
go back to reference Frumovitz M, Slomovitz BM, Singh DK, Broaddus RR, Abrams J, Sun CC, Bevers M, Bodurka DC (2004) Frozen section analyses as predictors of lymphatic spread in patients with early-stage uterine cancer. J Am Coll Surg 199:388–393CrossRefPubMed Frumovitz M, Slomovitz BM, Singh DK, Broaddus RR, Abrams J, Sun CC, Bevers M, Bodurka DC (2004) Frozen section analyses as predictors of lymphatic spread in patients with early-stage uterine cancer. J Am Coll Surg 199:388–393CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: incidence—SEER 17 regs limited-use+hurricane Katrina impacted Louisiana Cases, Nov 2008 sub (1973–2006 varying)—linked to County attributes—total U.S., 1969–2006 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2009, based on the November 2008 submission Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.​seer.​cancer.​gov) SEER*Stat Database: incidence—SEER 17 regs limited-use+hurricane Katrina impacted Louisiana Cases, Nov 2008 sub (1973–2006 varying)—linked to County attributes—total U.S., 1969–2006 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2009, based on the November 2008 submission
20.
go back to reference Mahdi H, Swensen RE, Hanna R, Kumar S, Ali-Fehmi R, Semaan A, Tamimi H, Morris RT, Munkarah AR (2011) Prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy in clinically early stage malignant germ cell tumour of the ovary. Br J Cancer 105:493–497CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Mahdi H, Swensen RE, Hanna R, Kumar S, Ali-Fehmi R, Semaan A, Tamimi H, Morris RT, Munkarah AR (2011) Prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy in clinically early stage malignant germ cell tumour of the ovary. Br J Cancer 105:493–497CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
21.
go back to reference Morice P, Joulie F, Camatte S, Atallah D, Rouzier R, Pautier P, Pomel C, Lhomme C, Duvillard P, Castaigne D (2003) Lymph node involvement in epithelial ovarian cancer: analysis of 276 pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomies and surgical implications. J Am Coll Surg 197:198–205CrossRefPubMed Morice P, Joulie F, Camatte S, Atallah D, Rouzier R, Pautier P, Pomel C, Lhomme C, Duvillard P, Castaigne D (2003) Lymph node involvement in epithelial ovarian cancer: analysis of 276 pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomies and surgical implications. J Am Coll Surg 197:198–205CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Mahdi H, Kumar S, Al-Wahab Z, Ali-Fehmi R, Munkarah AR (2013) Prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy in uterine serous cancer. BJOG 120:384–391CrossRefPubMed Mahdi H, Kumar S, Al-Wahab Z, Ali-Fehmi R, Munkarah AR (2013) Prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy in uterine serous cancer. BJOG 120:384–391CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Mariani AMF, Dowdy S, Podratz K, Bakkum-Gamez J, Cliby W, Weaver A, McGree M, Keeney G (2011) Reliability of frozen-section examination in endometrial carcinoma at a tertiary care center: is it appropriate for intra-operative guidance of treatment decisions? Gynecol Oncol 120:S92CrossRef Mariani AMF, Dowdy S, Podratz K, Bakkum-Gamez J, Cliby W, Weaver A, McGree M, Keeney G (2011) Reliability of frozen-section examination in endometrial carcinoma at a tertiary care center: is it appropriate for intra-operative guidance of treatment decisions? Gynecol Oncol 120:S92CrossRef
24.
go back to reference AlHilli MM, Podratz KC, Dowdy SC, Bakkum-Gamez JN, Weaver AL, McGree ME, Kumar S, Keeney GL, Cliby WA, Mariani A (2013) Preoperative biopsy and intraoperative tumor diameter predict lymph node dissemination in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 128:294–299CrossRefPubMed AlHilli MM, Podratz KC, Dowdy SC, Bakkum-Gamez JN, Weaver AL, McGree ME, Kumar S, Keeney GL, Cliby WA, Mariani A (2013) Preoperative biopsy and intraoperative tumor diameter predict lymph node dissemination in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 128:294–299CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Milam MR, Java J, Walker JL, Metzinger DS, Parker LP, Coleman RL (2012) Nodal metastasis risk in endometrioid endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 119:286–292CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Milam MR, Java J, Walker JL, Metzinger DS, Parker LP, Coleman RL (2012) Nodal metastasis risk in endometrioid endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 119:286–292CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
26.
go back to reference Rosenberg J, Chia YL, Plevritis S (2005) The effect of age, race, tumor size, tumor grade, and disease stage on invasive ductal breast cancer survival in the U.S. SEER database. Breast Cancer Res Treat 89:47–54CrossRefPubMed Rosenberg J, Chia YL, Plevritis S (2005) The effect of age, race, tumor size, tumor grade, and disease stage on invasive ductal breast cancer survival in the U.S. SEER database. Breast Cancer Res Treat 89:47–54CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Tumor size is an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis and survival in early stage endometrioid endometrial cancer
Authors
Haider Mahdi
Adnan R. Munkarah
Rouba Ali-Fehmi
Jessica Woessner
Shetal N. Shah
Mehdi Moslemi-Kebria
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3609-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2015 Go to the issue