Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2015

01-04-2015 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Epidemiologic aspects of shoulder dystocia-related neurological birth injuries

Authors: Leslie Iffy, Valeria Varadi, Zoltan Papp

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The first part of the study involved data collection for the detection of geographic variations and chronologic fluctuations in the rates of shoulder dystocia. The second part of the research evaluated head-to-body delivery times in cases of arrest of the shoulders at birth that had resulted in fetal damage during the last four decades in the USA.

Methods

The study of geographic and chronologic changes in the rates of shoulder dystocia rested on reported statistics coming from the USA and 11 other countries. These data were obtained by computer search. Evaluation of head-to-body delivery times rested on 104 well-documented cases that resulted in permanent neonatal damage.

Results

Literary reports of shoulder dystocia indicate that the incidence of shoulder dystocia has increased in the USA about fourfold since the middle of the twentieth century. No comparable trend has been reported from most other countries. Study of head-to-body delivery times revealed that more than two-thirds of all injured fetuses had been extracted from the birth canal within 2 minutes.

Conclusions

Incidents of shoulder dystocia began to escalate in the USA during the 1980s, shortly after the introduction of “active management” of the birthing process. This new technique replaced a conservative philosophy which had recommended abstinence from intervention on the part of the accoucheur. The authors consider the interventionist approach largely responsible for the exponential increase in the rates of shoulder dystocia in the USA. They recommend adherence to the traditional method of delivery on the part of obstetricians in Europe and elsewhere.
Footnotes
1
The quoted book won the British Medical Association Medical Books Award (first prize) in its category.
 
Literature
1.
Eastman NJ, Hellman LM (1961) Williams Obstetrics, 12th edn. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., New York, p 384, 420
2.
Apuzzio JJ, Vintzileos AM, Iffy L (eds) (2006) Operative Perinatology, 3rd ed. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 91–108, 241–263, 299–310
3.
Locatelli A, Incerti M, Ghidini A, Longini A, Casarico G, Ferrini S (2011) Head-to-body delivery interval using ‘two-step’ delivery approach to vaginal deliveries. Mat Fetal Med 20:624–634
4.
Roseveas SK, Stirrat GM (1966) Handbook of Obstetric Management. Blackwell Science, Oxford, p 251
5.
Myles M (1995) Textbook for Midwives, 10th edn. Churchill-Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 313–314
6.
Pritchard JA, MacDonald PC (1976) Williams Obstetrics, 15th edn. Appleton-Century-Croft, New York, pp 337–338
7.
Bottoms SF, Sokol RJ (1981) Mechanism and conduct of labor. In: Iffy L, Kaminetzky HA (eds) Principles and Practice of Obstetrics & Perinatology. Wiley, New York, pp 815–838
8.
Gherman RB, Chaucham S, Ouzonian JG, Lerner H, Gonik B, Goodwin M (2006) Shoulder dystocia: the unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 195:657–672. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ajog.​2005.​09.​007
9.
American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2002) Guidelines for perinatal care. Washington, DC, USA
10.
O’Leary JA (2009) Shoulder dystocia and birth injury, 3rd ed Humana Press, Totowa, pp. XV, 89–105. 10.1007/978-1-59745-473-5
11.
12.
Swartz DP (1960) Shoulder girdle dystocias in vertex delivery. Obstet Gynecol 15:194–206PubMed
13.
Schwartz RC, McClelland Dixon D (1958) Shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 11:468–471PubMed
14.
15.
Seigworth GI (1966) Shoulder dystocia: a review of 5 years’ experience. Obstet Gynecol 28:764–767PubMed
16.
Benedetti TJ, Gabbe SG (1978) Shoulder dystocia: a complication of fetal macrosomia and prolonged second stage of labor with mid-pelvic delivery. Obstet Gynecol 106:908–912
17.
Parks GD, Zeil HK (1978) Macrosomia: a proposed indication for cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 52:407–409PubMed
18.
Hopwood HG Jr (1982) Shoulder dystocia: fifteen years’ experience in a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 134:362–364
19.
20.
Acker D, Sachs B, Friedman EA (1985) Risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 66:762–768PubMed
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
MacFarland B, Langer FO, Piper JM, Berkus MD (1996) Perinatal outcome and the type and number of measures in shoulder dystocia. Gynecol Obstet 5:219–224
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
Johnston NR (1979) Shoulder girdle dystocia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 19:28–31CrossRef
33.
34.
35.
36.
Katona F (1998) Klinikai Fejlodesneurologia. Medicina Publ, Budapest
37.
38.
Kees S, Margaly V, Schiff E, Masiach S, Carp KJ (2001) Features of shoulder dystocia in a busy obstetric unit. J Reprod Med 46:583–588PubMed
39.
40.
Evans-Jones G, Kay SP, Weindling AM, Cranny G, Ward A, Bradshaw A, Hernon C (2003) Congenital brachial plexus palsy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonat Med 88:F185–F189CrossRef
41.
42.
Strobelt N, Locatelli A, Casarico G (2006) Head-to-body delivery interval time: what is the normal range? Obstet Gynecol 195S:110–114
43.
44.
45.
Fejes M, Koncz J, Szekelyi Z, Varadi K (2011) A szuleszeti brachialis plexus palsy epidemiologiaja: 2004–2008. Gyermekgyogyaszat 62:65–70
46.
47.
ACOG Practice patterns (1977) Shoulder dystocia. No. 7, Washington, DC, USA
48.
Brimacombe M, Iffy L, Apuzzio JJ, Varadi V, Nagy B, Raju V, Portuondo N (2008) Shoulder dystocia related neurological injuries: the predisposing role of forceps and ventouse extractions. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277:415–422. doi:10.​1007/​s00404-007-0465-7 CrossRefPubMed
49.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2005) Shoulder dystocia. Guideline 42, London, UK
50.
51.
52.
53.
Spong CY, Rodriguez D, Ross MG (1995) An objective definition of shoulder dystocia: prolonged head-to-body interval and/or the use of ancillary obstetric maneuvers. Obstet Gynecol 86:443–446. doi:10.​1016/​0029-7844(95)00188-W CrossRef
54.
55.
56.
57.
Iffy L (1987) Discussion of the presentation of Dr. T.L. Gross. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:1416
58.
Iffy L, Varadi V, Jakobovits A (1994) Common intrapartum denominators of shoulder dystocia related birth injuries. Zbl Gynak 116:33–37
59.
60.
Varadi V (2002) Fetal risk of macrosomia. Fetal Diag Therapy 17(Suppl):61
61.
62.
Iffy L, Pantages P (2005) Erb’s palsy after delivery by cesarean section. Med Law 24:655–662PubMed
63.
Iffy L, Capo JT, Apuzzio JJ, Varadi V, Brimacombe M, Portuondo N (2009) Conduct of delivery, shoulder dystocia and neurological birth injuries. Magyar Noorv Lap 72:211–219
64.
Iffy L (2014) Prevention of shoulder dystocia related birth injuries: myths and facts. World J Obstet Gynecol (in press)
65.
66.
67.
68.
Lancet M, Kessler I, Zosmer A (1992) The vacuum extractor. In: Iffy L, Apuzzio JJ, Vintzileos AM (eds) Operative Obstetrics, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York, pp 324–334
69.
70.
Papp Z (1999) A Szuleszet—Nogyogyaszt Tankonyve. Semmelweis Publ, Budapest, p 432
71.
72.
Benedetti TJ (1987) Shoulder dystocia. In: Pauerstein CJ (ed) Clinical Obstetrics. Wiley, New York, pp 871–882
73.
74.
Pescetto G, De Cecco L, Pecorari D, Ragni N (2009) Ginecologia e Ostetricia, 4th ed, Vol 2., Societa Editice Universo, Roma, p 1044
75.
Beer E, Mangiante G, Pecorari D (2006) Distocia Delle Spalle. CIC Edizioni Internazionali, Roma, pp 63–118
76.
Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ, Park MM (2000) Final data for 1998. National Vital Statistics Report 48:1–100
77.
Sever JW (1916) Obstetric paralysis, its etiology, pathology, clinical aspects and treatment with the report of four-hundred and seventy cases. Am J Dis Children 12:546–579
78.
Metaizeau JP, Gayet C, Plenat F (1979) Les lesions obstetricales du plexus brachial. Chir Pediatr 20:159–163PubMed
79.
Iffy L, Gittens-Williams LN (2008) Intrapartum care. In: Rees M, Karoshi M, Keith L (eds) Obesity and Pregnancy. The Royal Society of Medicine ed, London, pp 148–165
80.
Papp Z (2007) A Szuleszet-Nogyogyaszat Tankonyve, 3rd edn. Semmelweis Publ, Budapest, p 295
Metadata
Title
Epidemiologic aspects of shoulder dystocia-related neurological birth injuries
Authors
Leslie Iffy
Valeria Varadi
Zoltan Papp
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3453-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2015 Go to the issue

Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Patient safety and adverse events related with obstetric care

Case Report

Impact of ‘fire drill’ training and dedicated obstetric resuscitation code in improving fetomaternal outcome following cardiac arrest in a tertiary referral hospital setting in Singapore

Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Blood flow Doppler velocimetry measured during active labor

Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary teaching hospital: a 14-year review

Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Serotonin risk factors for the development of hypertension in pregnancy

Gynecologic Oncology

Clinical relevance of objectifying colposcopy