Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Statistical limits in sonographic estimation of birth weight

Authors: Marco Scioscia, Floriano Scioscia, Gaetano Scioscia, Stefano Bettocchi

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The accuracy of sonographic estimation of birth weight (EBW) is compromised by the precision of the biometrical measurements and the quality of the algorithms. This prospective study was to evaluate technical aspects to derive new equations for the EBW.

Methods

Three consecutive phases were carried out (1) to recruit a homogenous population, (2) to derive eight new algorithms using a multiple stepwise mathematical/statistical method, and (3) to test the accuracy of the developed equations. Only those patients with a singleton pregnancy who delivered within 48 h from the scan were considered for the analysis.

Results

The study population was made of 473 women. Four polynomial, two square root and two logarithmic algorithms were derived from a balanced study group of 200 women selected from the original study population. These formulas were subsequently applied and compared between them and showed a significant correlation with birth weight (p < 0.0001) and satisfactory statistical performances (r > 0.9), nevertheless they performed similarly to other equations previously published.

Conclusions

The present findings define better the limitations associated with the intrinsic properties of algorithms and highlight that the possibility to improve the precision of sonographic measurements remains the only point at issue to increase the accuracy in the prediction of birth weight.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Scioscia M, Vimercati A, Ceci O, Vicino M, Selvaggi LE (2008) Estimation of birth weight by two-dimensional ultrasonography: a critical appraisal of its accuracy. Obstet Gynecol 111:57–65PubMedCrossRef Scioscia M, Vimercati A, Ceci O, Vicino M, Selvaggi LE (2008) Estimation of birth weight by two-dimensional ultrasonography: a critical appraisal of its accuracy. Obstet Gynecol 111:57–65PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dudley NJ (2005) A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:80–89PubMedCrossRef Dudley NJ (2005) A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:80–89PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bernstein IM, Goran MI, Amini SB, Catalano PM (1997) Differential growth of fetal tissues during the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:28–32PubMedCrossRef Bernstein IM, Goran MI, Amini SB, Catalano PM (1997) Differential growth of fetal tissues during the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 176:28–32PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Larciprete G, Valensise H, Vasapollo B, Novelli GP, Parretti E, Altomare F, Di PG, Menghini S, Barbati G, Mello G, Arduini D (2003) Fetal subcutaneous tissue thickness (SCTT) in healthy and gestational diabetic pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22:591–597PubMedCrossRef Larciprete G, Valensise H, Vasapollo B, Novelli GP, Parretti E, Altomare F, Di PG, Menghini S, Barbati G, Mello G, Arduini D (2003) Fetal subcutaneous tissue thickness (SCTT) in healthy and gestational diabetic pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22:591–597PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Larciprete G, Valensise H, Di PG, Vasapollo B, Casalino B, Arduini D, Jarvis S, Cirese E (2005) Intrauterine growth restriction and fetal body composition. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:258–262PubMedCrossRef Larciprete G, Valensise H, Di PG, Vasapollo B, Casalino B, Arduini D, Jarvis S, Cirese E (2005) Intrauterine growth restriction and fetal body composition. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:258–262PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Scioscia M, Scioscia F, Vimercati A, Caradonna F, Nardelli C, Pinto LR, Selvaggi LE (2008) Estimation of fetal weight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness in the late third trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:314–320PubMedCrossRef Scioscia M, Scioscia F, Vimercati A, Caradonna F, Nardelli C, Pinto LR, Selvaggi LE (2008) Estimation of fetal weight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness in the late third trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:314–320PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mongelli M, Tambyraja R (2003) Ultrasonic fetal weight estimation and tolerance to measurement error: a comparative analysis. Australas Radiol 47:389–392PubMedCrossRef Mongelli M, Tambyraja R (2003) Ultrasonic fetal weight estimation and tolerance to measurement error: a comparative analysis. Australas Radiol 47:389–392PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kurmanavicius J, Burkhardt T, Wisser J, Huch R (2004) Ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation: accuracy of formulas and accuracy of examiners by birth weight from 500 to 5,000 g. J Perinat Med 32:155–161PubMedCrossRef Kurmanavicius J, Burkhardt T, Wisser J, Huch R (2004) Ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation: accuracy of formulas and accuracy of examiners by birth weight from 500 to 5,000 g. J Perinat Med 32:155–161PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chang TC, Robson SC, Spencer JA, Gallivan S (1993) Ultrasonic fetal weight estimation: analysis of inter- and intra-observer variability. J Clin Ultrasound 21:515–519PubMedCrossRef Chang TC, Robson SC, Spencer JA, Gallivan S (1993) Ultrasonic fetal weight estimation: analysis of inter- and intra-observer variability. J Clin Ultrasound 21:515–519PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mongelli M, Biswas A (2002) Menstrual age-dependent systematic error in sonographic fetal weight estimation: a mathematical model. J Clin Ultrasound 30:139–144PubMedCrossRef Mongelli M, Biswas A (2002) Menstrual age-dependent systematic error in sonographic fetal weight estimation: a mathematical model. J Clin Ultrasound 30:139–144PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rousseeuw PJ, Leroy AM (1987) Robust regression and outlier detection. Wiley-Interscience, New York (Series in Applied Probability and Statistics)CrossRef Rousseeuw PJ, Leroy AM (1987) Robust regression and outlier detection. Wiley-Interscience, New York (Series in Applied Probability and Statistics)CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dillon WR, Goldstein M (1984) Multivariate analysis: methods and applications. Wiley, New York Dillon WR, Goldstein M (1984) Multivariate analysis: methods and applications. Wiley, New York
14.
go back to reference Toutenburg H (2002) Statistical analysis of designed experiments, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Toutenburg H (2002) Statistical analysis of designed experiments, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
15.
go back to reference Anderson NG, Jolley IJ, Wells JE (2007) Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: comparison of bias, precision and consistency using 12 different formulae. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:173–179PubMedCrossRef Anderson NG, Jolley IJ, Wells JE (2007) Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: comparison of bias, precision and consistency using 12 different formulae. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:173–179PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Edwards A, Goff J, Baker L (2001) Accuracy and modifying factors of the sonographic estimation of fetal weight in a high-risk population. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 41:187–190PubMedCrossRef Edwards A, Goff J, Baker L (2001) Accuracy and modifying factors of the sonographic estimation of fetal weight in a high-risk population. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 41:187–190PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kehl S, Schmidt U, Spaich S, Schild RL, Sütterlin M, Siemer J (2012) What are the limits of accuracy in fetal weight estimation with conventional biometry in two-dimensional ultrasound? A novel postpartum study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39(5):543–548PubMedCrossRef Kehl S, Schmidt U, Spaich S, Schild RL, Sütterlin M, Siemer J (2012) What are the limits of accuracy in fetal weight estimation with conventional biometry in two-dimensional ultrasound? A novel postpartum study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39(5):543–548PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pagani G, Palai N, Zatti S, Fratelli N, Prefumo F, Frusca T (2014) Fetal weight estimation in gestational diabetic pregnancies: comparison between conventional and three-dimensional fractional thigh volume methods using gestation-adjusted projection. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 43(1):72–76PubMedCrossRef Pagani G, Palai N, Zatti S, Fratelli N, Prefumo F, Frusca T (2014) Fetal weight estimation in gestational diabetic pregnancies: comparison between conventional and three-dimensional fractional thigh volume methods using gestation-adjusted projection. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 43(1):72–76PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cevenini G, Severi FM, Bocchi C, Petraglia F, Barbini P (2008) An informative probability model enhancing real time echobiometry to improve fetal weight estimation accuracy. Med Biol Eng Comput 46:109–120PubMedCrossRef Cevenini G, Severi FM, Bocchi C, Petraglia F, Barbini P (2008) An informative probability model enhancing real time echobiometry to improve fetal weight estimation accuracy. Med Biol Eng Comput 46:109–120PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Statistical limits in sonographic estimation of birth weight
Authors
Marco Scioscia
Floriano Scioscia
Gaetano Scioscia
Stefano Bettocchi
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3384-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2015 Go to the issue