Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2013

01-09-2013 | General Gynecology

Costs of endometriosis in Austria: a survey of direct and indirect costs

Authors: Johanna Prast, Peter Oppelt, Andreas Shamiyeh, Omar Shebl, Iris Brandes, Dietmar Haas

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The literature includes a wealth of medical data on endometriosis, but the economic significance of the condition has so far been neglected. An analysis of hospital costs for endometriosis in Austria was, therefore, carried out for economic purposes.

Methods

Seventy-three patients with endometriosis were included in the study. A bottom-up approach was used to collect data on the average hospital costs of an endometriosis patient over a time period of 1 year. In addition, a prevalence approach was used that allows subsequent estimation of the total costs of endometriosis for the health-care system in Austria for that period. Retrospective questionnaire survey was conducted.

Results

The average annual costs of one case of endometriosis are €7,712, with €5,605.55 attributable to direct costs and €2,106.34 to indirect costs. This indicates an overall economic burden of €328 million. In-patient care (45 %) and loss of productivity (27 %) were identified as the major cost factors. The patients themselves pay for 13 % of the costs (through out-of-pocket payments).

Conclusions

This study impressively demonstrates the financial burden on the economy and on each individually affected patient caused by the disease of endometriosis. The massive consumption of resources represents a high level of usage of the medical services provided. The question arises as to whether more timely diagnosis, followed by better-targeted treatment, might have the potential to reduce these costs. The overall economic burden of endometriosis in Austria is currently comparable with that of Parkinson’s disease.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Endometriose Schweppe K (2003) Eine Erkrankung ohne Lobby. Zentralbl Gynäkol. 125:233CrossRef Endometriose Schweppe K (2003) Eine Erkrankung ohne Lobby. Zentralbl Gynäkol. 125:233CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Brandes I, Kleine-Budde K, Mittendorf T (2009) Krankheitskosten bei Endometriose. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 69:925–930CrossRef Brandes I, Kleine-Budde K, Mittendorf T (2009) Krankheitskosten bei Endometriose. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 69:925–930CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hudelist G, Fritzer N, Thomas A, Niehues C, Oppelt P, Haas D et al (2012) Diagnostic delay for endometriosis in Austria and Germany: causes and possible consequences. Hum Reprod 27:3412–3416PubMedCrossRef Hudelist G, Fritzer N, Thomas A, Niehues C, Oppelt P, Haas D et al (2012) Diagnostic delay for endometriosis in Austria and Germany: causes and possible consequences. Hum Reprod 27:3412–3416PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gao X, Outley J, Botteman M, Spalding J, Simon J, Pashos C (2006) Economic burden of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 86:1561–1572PubMedCrossRef Gao X, Outley J, Botteman M, Spalding J, Simon J, Pashos C (2006) Economic burden of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 86:1561–1572PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Simoens S, Hummelshoj L, D’Hooghe T (2007) Endometriosis: cost estimates and methodological perspective. Hum Reprod Update 14:395–404CrossRef Simoens S, Hummelshoj L, D’Hooghe T (2007) Endometriosis: cost estimates and methodological perspective. Hum Reprod Update 14:395–404CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Greiner W (2008) Die Berechnung von Kosten und Nutzen. In: Schöffski O, Graf von der Schulenburg JM (eds). Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen. Springer, Berlin, pp 49–63 Greiner W (2008) Die Berechnung von Kosten und Nutzen. In: Schöffski O, Graf von der Schulenburg JM (eds). Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen. Springer, Berlin, pp 49–63
14.
go back to reference Graf von der Schulenburg JM, Greiner W, Jost R, Klusen N, Kubin M, Leidl R et al (2007) Deutsche Empfehlung zur gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation: Dritte und aktualisierte Fassung des Hannoveraner Konsens. Gesundh Ökon Qual Manag. 12:285–290CrossRef Graf von der Schulenburg JM, Greiner W, Jost R, Klusen N, Kubin M, Leidl R et al (2007) Deutsche Empfehlung zur gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation: Dritte und aktualisierte Fassung des Hannoveraner Konsens. Gesundh Ökon Qual Manag. 12:285–290CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Campenhausen S, Winter Y, Gasser J, Seppi K, Reese J, Pfeiffer K et al (2009) Krankheitskosten und Versorgungssituation bei Morbus Parkinson—eine Analyse in Österreich. Wien Klin Wochenschr 121:574–582 [Article in German]CrossRef Campenhausen S, Winter Y, Gasser J, Seppi K, Reese J, Pfeiffer K et al (2009) Krankheitskosten und Versorgungssituation bei Morbus Parkinson—eine Analyse in Österreich. Wien Klin Wochenschr 121:574–582 [Article in German]CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Levy AR, Osenenko KM, Lozano-Ortega G, Sambrook R, Jeddi M, Bélisle S et al (2011) Economic burden of surgically confirmed endometriosis in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 33:830–837PubMed Levy AR, Osenenko KM, Lozano-Ortega G, Sambrook R, Jeddi M, Bélisle S et al (2011) Economic burden of surgically confirmed endometriosis in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 33:830–837PubMed
17.
go back to reference Simoens S, Dunselman G, Dirksen C, Hummelshoj L, Bokor A, Brandes I et al (2012) The burden of endometriosis: costs and quality of life of women with endometriosis and treated in referral centres. Hum Reprod 27:1292–1299PubMedCrossRef Simoens S, Dunselman G, Dirksen C, Hummelshoj L, Bokor A, Brandes I et al (2012) The burden of endometriosis: costs and quality of life of women with endometriosis and treated in referral centres. Hum Reprod 27:1292–1299PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Costs of endometriosis in Austria: a survey of direct and indirect costs
Authors
Johanna Prast
Peter Oppelt
Andreas Shamiyeh
Omar Shebl
Iris Brandes
Dietmar Haas
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2793-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2013 Go to the issue