Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2013

01-09-2013 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of women with FGM I and II in San Camillo Hospital, Burkina Faso

Authors: Antonio Frega, Giuliana Puzio, Paolo Maniglio, Angelica Catalano, Giusi Natalia Milazzo, Danila Lombardi, Henri Nitiema, Paola Bianchi

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Female genital mutilation (FGM) is still performed in the world. Women who underwent FGM have marked psychological, gynecological and obstetric consequences. This article contributes to the spread of knowledge about obstetric and neonatal outcomes in women with FGM I and II.

Methods

Our observational study compared the obstetric outcomes of 85 women with FGM I and II (case group) and 95 women without it (control group). We evaluated age, need of oxytocin during labor, duration of the expulsion phase, need of episiotomy, weight of the newborn, Apgar score at birth, resuscitation of the newborn, stillbirth. We observed the rate of cesarean sections and their main indications. We compared the rate of cesarean sections among the cases and the controls.

Results

Controls were younger than women who underwent FGM. Intravenous oxytocin injection was higher in cases. The expulsion phase was longer in women with FGM than in the controls. FGM is related to a higher risk of episiotomy. Apgar score 9/10 was more frequently assigned to babies from mothers without FGM. There were more resuscitated babies and more stillbirth in the group of cases. Ten percent of all women underwent cesarean section. FGM is related to a higher incidence of cesarean section.

Conclusion

FGM is associated with a higher risk of gynecological and obstetrical consequences, acting on women’s health and also on the economy of resource limited countries. Because of migration, health professionals could interface with women who underwent FGM and have to know their related complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Utz-Billing I, Kentenich H (2008) Female genital mutilation: an injury, physical and mental harm. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 29:225–229PubMedCrossRef Utz-Billing I, Kentenich H (2008) Female genital mutilation: an injury, physical and mental harm. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 29:225–229PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Abdulcadir J, Margairaz C, Boulvain M, Irion O (2011) Care of women with female genital mutilation/cutting. Swiss Med Wkly 140:w13137PubMed Abdulcadir J, Margairaz C, Boulvain M, Irion O (2011) Care of women with female genital mutilation/cutting. Swiss Med Wkly 140:w13137PubMed
3.
go back to reference World Health Organization, Geneve (1997) Female genital mutilation. A joint WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA statement World Health Organization, Geneve (1997) Female genital mutilation. A joint WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA statement
4.
go back to reference Hosken FP (1992) Genital and sexual mutilation of females. The Hosken report, 3rd review edn. Women International Network News (WINN) 18:4 Hosken FP (1992) Genital and sexual mutilation of females. The Hosken report, 3rd review edn. Women International Network News (WINN) 18:4
5.
go back to reference World Health Organisation (WHO) (2012) Female genital mutilation. Fact sheet No 241 World Health Organisation (WHO) (2012) Female genital mutilation. Fact sheet No 241
6.
go back to reference Turillazzi E, Fineschi V (2007) Female genital mutilation: the ethical impact of the new Italian law. J Med Ethics 33:98–101PubMedCrossRef Turillazzi E, Fineschi V (2007) Female genital mutilation: the ethical impact of the new Italian law. J Med Ethics 33:98–101PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference World Health Organisation (WHO) (1995) Female genital mutilation. Report of The WHO Technical Working Group, Geneva World Health Organisation (WHO) (1995) Female genital mutilation. Report of The WHO Technical Working Group, Geneva
9.
go back to reference Leye EPR, Nienhuis G, Claeys P, Temmerman M (2006) Health care in Europe for women with genital mutilation. Health Care Women Int 27:362–378PubMedCrossRef Leye EPR, Nienhuis G, Claeys P, Temmerman M (2006) Health care in Europe for women with genital mutilation. Health Care Women Int 27:362–378PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Banks E, Meirik O, Farley T et al (2006) Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries. Lancet 367:1835–1841PubMedCrossRef Banks E, Meirik O, Farley T et al (2006) Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries. Lancet 367:1835–1841PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Larsen U, Okonofua FE (2002) Female circumcision and obstetric complications. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 77(3):255–265PubMedCrossRef Larsen U, Okonofua FE (2002) Female circumcision and obstetric complications. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 77(3):255–265PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vangen S, Johansen RE, Sundby J, Traeen B, Stray-Pedersen B (2004) Qualitative study of perinatal care experiences among Somali women and local health care professionals in Norway. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 112:29–35PubMedCrossRef Vangen S, Johansen RE, Sundby J, Traeen B, Stray-Pedersen B (2004) Qualitative study of perinatal care experiences among Somali women and local health care professionals in Norway. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 112:29–35PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Betran AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA et al (2007) Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinatl Epidemiol 21:98–113CrossRef Betran AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA et al (2007) Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinatl Epidemiol 21:98–113CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ronsmans C, Holtz S, Stanton C (2006) Socioeconomic differentials in caesarean rates in developing countries: a retrospective analysis. Lancet 368:1516–1523PubMedCrossRef Ronsmans C, Holtz S, Stanton C (2006) Socioeconomic differentials in caesarean rates in developing countries: a retrospective analysis. Lancet 368:1516–1523PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Satnton C, Ronsmans C (2008) Recommendations for routine reporting on indications for cesarean delivery in developing countries. Birth 35:204–211CrossRef Satnton C, Ronsmans C (2008) Recommendations for routine reporting on indications for cesarean delivery in developing countries. Birth 35:204–211CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Torloni MR, Betran AP, Souza JP et al (2011) Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review. PLoS One 6:e14566PubMedCrossRef Torloni MR, Betran AP, Souza JP et al (2011) Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review. PLoS One 6:e14566PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chu K, Cortier H, Maldonado F, Mashant T, Ford N, Trelles M (2012) Cesarean section rates and indications in Sub-Saharan Africa: a multi country study from medecins sans frontieres. PLoS One 7:e44484PubMedCrossRef Chu K, Cortier H, Maldonado F, Mashant T, Ford N, Trelles M (2012) Cesarean section rates and indications in Sub-Saharan Africa: a multi country study from medecins sans frontieres. PLoS One 7:e44484PubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Omale AE, Ogunniyi SO, Iliyasu Z (2004) Complications of female genital mutilation in Ile-Ife Nigeria: a ten year review. Nig J Basic Clin Sci 2:50–54 Omale AE, Ogunniyi SO, Iliyasu Z (2004) Complications of female genital mutilation in Ile-Ife Nigeria: a ten year review. Nig J Basic Clin Sci 2:50–54
20.
go back to reference Odoi AT (2005) Female genital mutilation. In: Kwawukume EY, Emuveyan EE (eds) Comprehensive gynaecology in the tropics, 1st edn. Graphic Packaging Limited, Levin, pp 268–278 Odoi AT (2005) Female genital mutilation. In: Kwawukume EY, Emuveyan EE (eds) Comprehensive gynaecology in the tropics, 1st edn. Graphic Packaging Limited, Levin, pp 268–278
21.
go back to reference Garba ID, Muhammed Z, Abubakar IS, Yakasai IA (2012) Prevalence of female genital mutilation among female infants in Kano, Northern Nigeria. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286:423–428PubMedCrossRef Garba ID, Muhammed Z, Abubakar IS, Yakasai IA (2012) Prevalence of female genital mutilation among female infants in Kano, Northern Nigeria. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286:423–428PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hakim LY (2001) Impact of female genital mutilation on maternal and neonatal outcomes during parturition. East Afr Med J 78:255–258PubMed Hakim LY (2001) Impact of female genital mutilation on maternal and neonatal outcomes during parturition. East Afr Med J 78:255–258PubMed
23.
go back to reference Snow RC, Slanger TE, Okonofua FE, Oronsaye F, Wacker J (2002) Female genital cutting in southern urban and peri-urban Nigeria: self-reported validity, social determinants and secular decline. Trop Med Int Health 7(1):91–100PubMedCrossRef Snow RC, Slanger TE, Okonofua FE, Oronsaye F, Wacker J (2002) Female genital cutting in southern urban and peri-urban Nigeria: self-reported validity, social determinants and secular decline. Trop Med Int Health 7(1):91–100PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bishai D, Bonnenfant YT, Darwish M et al (2010) FGM Cost Study Group of World Health Organization Estimating the obstetric costs of female genital mutilation in six African countries. Bull World Health Organ 88:281–288PubMedCrossRef Bishai D, Bonnenfant YT, Darwish M et al (2010) FGM Cost Study Group of World Health Organization Estimating the obstetric costs of female genital mutilation in six African countries. Bull World Health Organ 88:281–288PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Diejomaoh FME, Faal MKB (1981) Adhesion of the labia minora complicating circumcision in the neonatal period in a Nigerian community. Trop Geogr Med 33:135–138PubMed Diejomaoh FME, Faal MKB (1981) Adhesion of the labia minora complicating circumcision in the neonatal period in a Nigerian community. Trop Geogr Med 33:135–138PubMed
26.
go back to reference Karmaker B, Kandala NB, Chung D, Clarke A (2011) Factors associated with female genital mutilation in Burkina Faso and its policy implications. Int J Equity Health 18:20CrossRef Karmaker B, Kandala NB, Chung D, Clarke A (2011) Factors associated with female genital mutilation in Burkina Faso and its policy implications. Int J Equity Health 18:20CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mohammad AT, Mohsen AG, Mahmoud NA, Mostafa A, Esmat M, Mona S (2008) Prevalence of female genital cutting among Egyptian girls. Bull World Health Organ 86:269–274CrossRef Mohammad AT, Mohsen AG, Mahmoud NA, Mostafa A, Esmat M, Mona S (2008) Prevalence of female genital cutting among Egyptian girls. Bull World Health Organ 86:269–274CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wuest S, Raio L, Wyssmueller D et al (2009) Effects of female genital mutilation on birth outcomes in Switzerland. BJOG 116:1204–1209PubMedCrossRef Wuest S, Raio L, Wyssmueller D et al (2009) Effects of female genital mutilation on birth outcomes in Switzerland. BJOG 116:1204–1209PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of women with FGM I and II in San Camillo Hospital, Burkina Faso
Authors
Antonio Frega
Giuliana Puzio
Paolo Maniglio
Angelica Catalano
Giusi Natalia Milazzo
Danila Lombardi
Henri Nitiema
Paola Bianchi
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2779-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2013 Go to the issue