Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2013

01-05-2013 | General Gynecology

Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before hysteroscopy: a randomized clinical trial

Authors: Fateme Davari Tanha, Shohreh Salimi, Mahsa Ghajarzadeh

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of two routes of misoprostol (sublingual and vaginal) for cervical ripening before hysteroscopy.

Methods

One hundred and ten perimenopausal women who were referred to a tertiary hospital for surgical hysteroscopy enrolled in this double-blind randomized clinical trial. They were divided into two groups to receive 400 mg misoprostol either sublingually or vaginally 6 h before hysteroscopy. The duration of dilatation, Hegar number inserted into the cervix without resistance, and hysteroscopic and drug complications were recorded for all cases.

Results

Forty-nine women in sublingual and 51 in vaginal group participated in the study. Dilatation time was significantly lower in sublingual group (P < 0.001). Median Hegar number passed into the cervix without resistance was 5 in sublingual versus 4 in vaginal group (P = 0.002). Cramp followed by vomiting and diarrhea were the most common side effects of misoprostol in the sublingual group, while cramp followed by vomiting was the most frequent side effect in the vaginal group. Diarrhea was not reported in the vaginal group (P = 0.008).

Conclusion

Sublingual route of misoprostol could be considered as an effective medication before surgical hysteroscopy in perimenopausal women.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Munro MG, Jensen J, Purdon TF (1994) Narrow caliber office hysteroscope. J Am Assoc Laparosc 1:S24CrossRef Munro MG, Jensen J, Purdon TF (1994) Narrow caliber office hysteroscope. J Am Assoc Laparosc 1:S24CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Campo R, Van Belle Y, Rombatus L, Brosens I, Gordts S (1999) Office mini-hysteroscopy. Hum Reprod Update 5:73–81PubMedCrossRef Campo R, Van Belle Y, Rombatus L, Brosens I, Gordts S (1999) Office mini-hysteroscopy. Hum Reprod Update 5:73–81PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, van Ulzen K, Hermans J, Trimbos JB, Trimbos-Kemper TC (2000) Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 96:266–270PubMedCrossRef Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, van Ulzen K, Hermans J, Trimbos JB, Trimbos-Kemper TC (2000) Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 96:266–270PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Loffer FD (1989) Hysteroscopy with selective endometrial sampling compared with D&C for abnormal uterine bleeding: the value of a negative hysteroscopic view. Obstet Gynecol 73:16–20PubMed Loffer FD (1989) Hysteroscopy with selective endometrial sampling compared with D&C for abnormal uterine bleeding: the value of a negative hysteroscopic view. Obstet Gynecol 73:16–20PubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Ngai SW, Chan YM, Liu KL, Ho PC (1997) Oral misoprostol for cervical priming in non-pregnant women. Hum Reprod 12:2373–2375PubMedCrossRef Ngai SW, Chan YM, Liu KL, Ho PC (1997) Oral misoprostol for cervical priming in non-pregnant women. Hum Reprod 12:2373–2375PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Khan RU, El-Refaey H, Sharma S, Sooranna D, Stafford M (2004) Oral, rectal and vaginal pharmacokinetics of misoprotol. Obstet Gynecol 103:866–870PubMedCrossRef Khan RU, El-Refaey H, Sharma S, Sooranna D, Stafford M (2004) Oral, rectal and vaginal pharmacokinetics of misoprotol. Obstet Gynecol 103:866–870PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tang OS, Schweer H, Seyberth HW, Lee SW, Ho PC (2002) Pharmacokinetics of different routes of administration misprostol. Hum Reprod 17:332–336PubMedCrossRef Tang OS, Schweer H, Seyberth HW, Lee SW, Ho PC (2002) Pharmacokinetics of different routes of administration misprostol. Hum Reprod 17:332–336PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mulayim B, Celik NY, Celik G, Bagis T, Zeyneloglu HB (2010) Sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening before diagnostic hysteroscopy in premenopausal women: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril 93:2400–2404PubMedCrossRef Mulayim B, Celik NY, Celik G, Bagis T, Zeyneloglu HB (2010) Sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening before diagnostic hysteroscopy in premenopausal women: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril 93:2400–2404PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bisharah M, Al-Fozan H, Tulandi T (2003) A randomized trial of sublingual misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10:390–391PubMedCrossRef Bisharah M, Al-Fozan H, Tulandi T (2003) A randomized trial of sublingual misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10:390–391PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Preutthipan S, Herabutya Y (2006) A randomized comparison of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical priming in nulliparous women before operative hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 86:990–994PubMedCrossRef Preutthipan S, Herabutya Y (2006) A randomized comparison of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical priming in nulliparous women before operative hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 86:990–994PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fernandez H, Alby JD, Tournoux C, Chauveaud-Lambling A, DeTayrac R, Frydman R et al (2004) Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy in pre-menopausal women: a doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial with three dose regimens. Hum Reprod 19:1618–1621PubMedCrossRef Fernandez H, Alby JD, Tournoux C, Chauveaud-Lambling A, DeTayrac R, Frydman R et al (2004) Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy in pre-menopausal women: a doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial with three dose regimens. Hum Reprod 19:1618–1621PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sordia-Hernandez LH, Rosales-Tristan E, Vazquez-Mendez J, Merino M, Iglesias JL, Garza-Leal JG, Morales A (2011) Effectiveness of misoprostol for office hysteroscopy without anesthesia in infertile patients. Obstet Gynecol 95:759–761 Sordia-Hernandez LH, Rosales-Tristan E, Vazquez-Mendez J, Merino M, Iglesias JL, Garza-Leal JG, Morales A (2011) Effectiveness of misoprostol for office hysteroscopy without anesthesia in infertile patients. Obstet Gynecol 95:759–761
14.
go back to reference Choksuchat C, Cheewadhanaraks S, Getpook C, Wootipoom V, Dhanavoravibul K (2006) Misoprostol for cervical ripening in non-pregnant women: a randomized double-blind controlled trial of oral versus vaginal regimens. Hum Reprod 21:2167–2170PubMedCrossRef Choksuchat C, Cheewadhanaraks S, Getpook C, Wootipoom V, Dhanavoravibul K (2006) Misoprostol for cervical ripening in non-pregnant women: a randomized double-blind controlled trial of oral versus vaginal regimens. Hum Reprod 21:2167–2170PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Saxena P, Salhan S, Sarda N (2004) Comparison between the sublingual and oral route of misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming in first trimester abortions. Hum Reprod 19:1–4CrossRef Saxena P, Salhan S, Sarda N (2004) Comparison between the sublingual and oral route of misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming in first trimester abortions. Hum Reprod 19:1–4CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tang OS, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Ho PC (2007) Misoprostol: pharmacokinetic profiles, effects on the uterus and side-effects. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 99(Suppl 2):S160–S167PubMedCrossRef Tang OS, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Ho PC (2007) Misoprostol: pharmacokinetic profiles, effects on the uterus and side-effects. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 99(Suppl 2):S160–S167PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before hysteroscopy: a randomized clinical trial
Authors
Fateme Davari Tanha
Shohreh Salimi
Mahsa Ghajarzadeh
Publication date
01-05-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2652-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2013 Go to the issue