Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2013

01-03-2013 | General Gynecology

Assessing menstrual tampon irritation using the “Behind-The-Knee” test

Authors: Miranda A. Farage, Kenneth W. Miller, William J. Ledger

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Colposcopic inspection of the vagina is a routine component of the safety assessment of intravaginal products. However, colposcopic findings occur frequently in healthy women, raising questions about their relevance to intravaginal product safety. Practical disadvantages limit the utility of colposcopy for evaluating menstrual tampons, among them the presence of background microtrauma, the inability to assess effects during menstruation, and, importantly, the question of whether post hoc assessments are sufficiently sensitive to detect small inflammatory changes. The Behind-The-Knee (BTK) test is an alternative for evaluating inflammatory and tissue dryness effects of physical articles by their repeated application to the popliteal fossa under an elastic bandage. It enables concurrent parallel comparisons of experimental and control articles over time and substantially increases the sensitivity of detecting small changes in tissue inflammation.

Material and methods

With the protocol, uncompressed experimental and control tampons yielded comparable relative and absolute erythema scores (after overnight recovery) as did colposcopic assessment of the lower genital tract 3–48 h after menstrual use. Scoring erythema in the BTK test immediately after product removal increased the level of visually discernible inflammation sixfold. In a study of commercial menstrual pads, subclinical inflammation visualized with cross-polarized light correlated with the frequency of subjective reports of discomfort during the test and discriminated the relative tolerability of the two products determined by market surveillance, providing added confidence in the predictive value of the test.

Conclusion

We believe the BTK test can be a valuable alternative to colposcopy for assessing inflammation and dryness associated with menstrual tampons.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Mauck CK, Baker JM, Birnkrant DB, Rowe PJ, Gabelnick HL (2000) The use of colposcopy in assessing vaginal irritation in research. AIDS (London, England) 14(15):2221–2227CrossRef Mauck CK, Baker JM, Birnkrant DB, Rowe PJ, Gabelnick HL (2000) The use of colposcopy in assessing vaginal irritation in research. AIDS (London, England) 14(15):2221–2227CrossRef
3.
go back to reference O’Neill E, Reeves MF, Creinin MD (2008) Baseline colposcopic findings in women entering studies on female vaginal products. Contraception 78(2):162–166PubMedCrossRef O’Neill E, Reeves MF, Creinin MD (2008) Baseline colposcopic findings in women entering studies on female vaginal products. Contraception 78(2):162–166PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fraser IS, Lahteenmaki P, Elomaa K, Lacarra M, Mishell DR Jr, Alvarez F et al (1999) Variations in vaginal epithelial surface appearance determined by colposcopic inspection in healthy, sexually active women. Hum reprod (Oxford, England) 14(8):1974–1978CrossRef Fraser IS, Lahteenmaki P, Elomaa K, Lacarra M, Mishell DR Jr, Alvarez F et al (1999) Variations in vaginal epithelial surface appearance determined by colposcopic inspection in healthy, sexually active women. Hum reprod (Oxford, England) 14(8):1974–1978CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Norvell MK, Benrubi GI, Thompson RJ (1984) Investigation of microtrauma after sexual intercourse. J Reprod Med 29(4):269–271PubMed Norvell MK, Benrubi GI, Thompson RJ (1984) Investigation of microtrauma after sexual intercourse. J Reprod Med 29(4):269–271PubMed
6.
go back to reference Ballagh SA, Mauck CK, Henry D, Archer DF, Abercrombie T, Callahan MM et al (2004) A comparison of techniques to assess cervicovaginal irritation and evaluation of the variability between two observers. Contraception 70(3):241–249PubMedCrossRef Ballagh SA, Mauck CK, Henry D, Archer DF, Abercrombie T, Callahan MM et al (2004) A comparison of techniques to assess cervicovaginal irritation and evaluation of the variability between two observers. Contraception 70(3):241–249PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Farage MA, Singh M, Ledger WJ (2009) Investigation of the sensitivity of a cross-polarized light visualization system to detect subclinical erythema and dryness in women with vulvovaginitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(1):20.e1–20.e6CrossRef Farage MA, Singh M, Ledger WJ (2009) Investigation of the sensitivity of a cross-polarized light visualization system to detect subclinical erythema and dryness in women with vulvovaginitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(1):20.e1–20.e6CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wensveen C, Kagie M, Nagelkerke N, Trimbos B (2007) Interobserver agreement on interpreting hand drawings of colposcopy in women with borderline cytology to predict high-grade lesions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 135(1):123–126PubMedCrossRef Wensveen C, Kagie M, Nagelkerke N, Trimbos B (2007) Interobserver agreement on interpreting hand drawings of colposcopy in women with borderline cytology to predict high-grade lesions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 135(1):123–126PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cummins JE Jr, Doncel GF (2009) Biomarkers of cervicovaginal inflammation for the assessment of microbicide safety. Sex Transm Dis 36(3 Suppl):S84–S91PubMed Cummins JE Jr, Doncel GF (2009) Biomarkers of cervicovaginal inflammation for the assessment of microbicide safety. Sex Transm Dis 36(3 Suppl):S84–S91PubMed
10.
go back to reference Farage MA, Gilpin DA, Enane NA, Baldwin S (2001) Development of a new test for mechanical irritation: behind the knee as a test site. Skin Res Technol 7(3):193–203PubMedCrossRef Farage MA, Gilpin DA, Enane NA, Baldwin S (2001) Development of a new test for mechanical irritation: behind the knee as a test site. Skin Res Technol 7(3):193–203PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Farage MA (2009) Sensory effects and irritation: a strong relationship. In: Barel AO, Paye M, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of cosmetic science and technology, 3rd edn. Informa Health Care, New York, pp 381–389 Farage MA (2009) Sensory effects and irritation: a strong relationship. In: Barel AO, Paye M, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of cosmetic science and technology, 3rd edn. Informa Health Care, New York, pp 381–389
12.
go back to reference Farage MA, Miller KW, Ledger WJ (2011) Can the BTK clinical test be used to evaluate the mechanical irritation potential for products intended for contact with mucous membranes? In: Surber C, Elsner P, Farage MA (eds) Topical applications and the mucosa. Curr Prob Dermatol, vol 40. Karger, Basel, pp 125–132 Farage MA, Miller KW, Ledger WJ (2011) Can the BTK clinical test be used to evaluate the mechanical irritation potential for products intended for contact with mucous membranes? In: Surber C, Elsner P, Farage MA (eds) Topical applications and the mucosa. Curr Prob Dermatol, vol 40. Karger, Basel, pp 125–132
Metadata
Title
Assessing menstrual tampon irritation using the “Behind-The-Knee” test
Authors
Miranda A. Farage
Kenneth W. Miller
William J. Ledger
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2641-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3/2013 Go to the issue