Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2012

01-07-2012 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Characterisation of the learning curve of caesarean section

Authors: P. Soergel, T. Jensen, L. Makowski, C. von Kaisenberg, P. Hillemanns

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Caesarean section is one of the common operations in medicine. As almost all interventions, the quality of the operation depends on the training and skills of the surgeon. This study aims at characterising the learning curve of caesarean section.

Material and methods

All patients with a singleton pregnancy who underwent a caesarean section between 2000 and 2009 in our university hospital were identified. We analysed datasets from beginners (no experience at all) and experienced surgeons (>300 caesarean sections, consultant) comparing the parameter incision–suture time (I–S time), incision–delivery time (I–D time), maternal blood loss, umbilical artery pH (ua-pH), APGAR score after 1, 5 and 10 min, mean time in hospital and postoperative complications. In addition, the first 100 caesarean sections of each beginner surgeon were divided in groups of 10 (1–10, 11–20, etc.) and analysed using the above-mentioned parameters. The learning curves were calculated.

Results

2,515 of 3,844 operations were carried out by 23 experienced surgeons versus 1,329 operations by 22 beginners. The I–S time and I–D time was significantly higher in the beginners group than in the experienced surgeon’s group (45.9 vs. 41.3 min, p < 0.001). Furthermore, for the first ten caesarean sections, the mean I–S time (47.9 min, 95% CI 45.7–50.0 min vs. 31–40th caesarean section with 43.1 min, 95% CI 40.9–45.3 min, p < 0.0001) and I–D time (9.5 min, 95% CI 8.6–10.5 min vs. 71–80th caesarean section with 4.8 min, 95% CI 4.2–5.4 min, p < 0.0001) was significantly higher than of the subsequent datasets of ten operations, showing a typical learning curve.

Conclusion

The learning curve for the total operation time and incision–delivery time reaches a flatter part after 10–15 caesarean sections. However, the learning process is highly individualised and difficult to predict, so that supervision and evaluation of the trainee by an experienced surgeon is important.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Raza A, Coomarasamy A, Khan KS (2009) Best evidence continuous medical education. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280(4):683–687PubMedCrossRef Raza A, Coomarasamy A, Khan KS (2009) Best evidence continuous medical education. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280(4):683–687PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Teoh T (1997) Effect of learning curve on the outcome of external cephalic version. Singapore Med J 1997(38):323–325 Teoh T (1997) Effect of learning curve on the outcome of external cephalic version. Singapore Med J 1997(38):323–325
3.
go back to reference Tirri BF, Troeger C, Holzgreve W, Tercanli S (2007) Quality management of nuchal translucency measurement in residents. Ultraschall Med 28:484–488CrossRef Tirri BF, Troeger C, Holzgreve W, Tercanli S (2007) Quality management of nuchal translucency measurement in residents. Ultraschall Med 28:484–488CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Velemir L, Vendittelli F, Bonnefoy C, Accoceberry M, Savary D, Gallot D (2009) Learning curve of vacuum extraction in residency: a preliminary study. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 38:421–429CrossRef Velemir L, Vendittelli F, Bonnefoy C, Accoceberry M, Savary D, Gallot D (2009) Learning curve of vacuum extraction in residency: a preliminary study. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 38:421–429CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Marengo F, Larraín D, Babilonti L, Spinillo A (2012) Learning experience using the double-console da Vinci surgical system in gynecology: a prospective cohort study in a university hospital. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(2):441–445PubMedCrossRef Marengo F, Larraín D, Babilonti L, Spinillo A (2012) Learning experience using the double-console da Vinci surgical system in gynecology: a prospective cohort study in a university hospital. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(2):441–445PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fok W, Chan L, Chung T (2006) The effect of learning curve on the outcome of caesarean section. BJOG 113:1259–1263PubMedCrossRef Fok W, Chan L, Chung T (2006) The effect of learning curve on the outcome of caesarean section. BJOG 113:1259–1263PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Müller I, Zimmermann R (2003) The learning curve in the context of the cesarean section. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 43:238–244PubMedCrossRef Müller I, Zimmermann R (2003) The learning curve in the context of the cesarean section. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 43:238–244PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ebbinghaus H (1885) Über das Gedächtnis. Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie. Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig Ebbinghaus H (1885) Über das Gedächtnis. Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie. Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig
9.
go back to reference Bills A (1934) General experimental psychology. Longmans’ psychology series. Longmans, Green and Co, New York, pp 192–215CrossRef Bills A (1934) General experimental psychology. Longmans’ psychology series. Longmans, Green and Co, New York, pp 192–215CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wright T (1936) Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. J Aeronaut Sci 3:122–128 Wright T (1936) Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. J Aeronaut Sci 3:122–128
Metadata
Title
Characterisation of the learning curve of caesarean section
Authors
P. Soergel
T. Jensen
L. Makowski
C. von Kaisenberg
P. Hillemanns
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2230-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2012 Go to the issue