Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2011

01-10-2011 | Reproductive Medicine

Timing of intrauterine insemination: an attempt to unravel the enigma

Authors: Syed Monajatur Rahman, Debjyoti Karmakar, Neena Malhotra, Sunesh Kumar

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with intrauterine insemination (IUI) is an effective treatment in cases of cervical factor, unexplained infertility and mild male factor. The optimal timing of IUI after human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) after COS with clomiphene citrate is debatable and may be a factor limiting success of same. This study was designed to scientifically determine if variation in the timing of IUI could affect the cycle outcome.

Materials and methods

In a prospective randomized trial couples with mild male factor, unexplained infertility and mild endometriosis who underwent COS with IUI were recruited. COS was achieved with clomiphene citrate. Two hundred and four women underwent 461 cycles of IUI. Women were randomized to two groups: group I (104 patients, 231 cycles) had IUI 36 h after hCG, while group II (100 patients, 230 cycles) had IUI 24 h after hCG. Primary outcome included pregnancy rate per couple and per cycle.

Results

Fifty-four patients had pregnancy with and pregnancy rate per couple and per cycle were 32.6 and 14.7% in group I and 20 and 8.6% in group II, respectively (not statistically different).

Conclusions

Altering timing of IUI after COS does not enhance pregnancy rates. IUI 36 h after hCG has marginally better pregnancy rates than 24 h. Timing of insemination may be kept at 24 or 36 h after hCG injection to suit the convenience of the clinic or care provider. The lack of statistical significance indicates need for larger studies to draw guidelines.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Goverde AJ, McDonnell J, Vermeiden JP, Schats R, Rutten FF, Schoemaker J (2000) Intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet 355(9197):13–18PubMedCrossRef Goverde AJ, McDonnell J, Vermeiden JP, Schats R, Rutten FF, Schoemaker J (2000) Intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet 355(9197):13–18PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cohlen BJ, te Velde ER, van Kooij RJ (1995) Is there still a place for intra-uterine insemination as a treatment for male subfertility? A review. Int J Androl 18(Suppl 2):72–75 (review)PubMed Cohlen BJ, te Velde ER, van Kooij RJ (1995) Is there still a place for intra-uterine insemination as a treatment for male subfertility? A review. Int J Androl 18(Suppl 2):72–75 (review)PubMed
3.
go back to reference Ragni G, Somigliana E, Vegetti W (2004) Timing of intrauterine insemination: where are we? Fertil Steril 82(1):25–26 (discussion 32–35; review)PubMedCrossRef Ragni G, Somigliana E, Vegetti W (2004) Timing of intrauterine insemination: where are we? Fertil Steril 82(1):25–26 (discussion 32–35; review)PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Campana A, Sakkas D, Stalberg A, Bianchi PG et al (1996) Intrauterine insemination: evaluation of the results according to the woman’s age, sperm quality, total sperm count per insemination and life table analysis. Hum Reprod 11:732–736PubMed Campana A, Sakkas D, Stalberg A, Bianchi PG et al (1996) Intrauterine insemination: evaluation of the results according to the woman’s age, sperm quality, total sperm count per insemination and life table analysis. Hum Reprod 11:732–736PubMed
5.
go back to reference Duran HE, Morshedi M, Kruger T, Oehninger S (2002) Intrauterine insemination, a systematic review on determinants of success. Hum Reprod Update 8(4):373–384PubMedCrossRef Duran HE, Morshedi M, Kruger T, Oehninger S (2002) Intrauterine insemination, a systematic review on determinants of success. Hum Reprod Update 8(4):373–384PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Khalil MR, Rasmussen PE, Erb K, Laursen SB, Rex S, Westergaard LG (2001) Homologous intrauterine insemination: an evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2473 cycles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:74–81PubMedCrossRef Khalil MR, Rasmussen PE, Erb K, Laursen SB, Rex S, Westergaard LG (2001) Homologous intrauterine insemination: an evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2473 cycles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:74–81PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Demir B, Dilbaz B, Cinar O, Karadag B, Tasci Y, Kocak M, Dilbaz S, Goktolga U (2011) Factors affecting pregnancy outcome of intrauterine insemination cycles in couples with favourable female characteristics. J Obstet Gynaecol 31(5):420–423PubMedCrossRef Demir B, Dilbaz B, Cinar O, Karadag B, Tasci Y, Kocak M, Dilbaz S, Goktolga U (2011) Factors affecting pregnancy outcome of intrauterine insemination cycles in couples with favourable female characteristics. J Obstet Gynaecol 31(5):420–423PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ozçakir HT, Göker EN, Terek MC, Adakan S, Ulukus M, Levi R, Tavmergen E (2002) Relationship of follicle number, serum estradiol level, and other factors to clinical pregnancy rate in gonadotropin-induced intrauterine insemination cycles. Arch Gynecol Obstet 266(1):18–20PubMedCrossRef Ozçakir HT, Göker EN, Terek MC, Adakan S, Ulukus M, Levi R, Tavmergen E (2002) Relationship of follicle number, serum estradiol level, and other factors to clinical pregnancy rate in gonadotropin-induced intrauterine insemination cycles. Arch Gynecol Obstet 266(1):18–20PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dodson WC, Haney AF (1991) Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril 55:457–467PubMed Dodson WC, Haney AF (1991) Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril 55:457–467PubMed
10.
go back to reference Robb PA, Robins JC, Thomas MA (2004) Timing of hCG administration does not affect pregnancy rates in couples undergoing intrauterine insemination using clomiphene citrate. J Natl Med Assoc 96(11):1431–1433PubMed Robb PA, Robins JC, Thomas MA (2004) Timing of hCG administration does not affect pregnancy rates in couples undergoing intrauterine insemination using clomiphene citrate. J Natl Med Assoc 96(11):1431–1433PubMed
11.
go back to reference World Health Organization (2001) Laboratory manual of the World Health Organization for the examination of human semen and sperm–cervical mucus interaction. Ann Ist Super Sanita (I–XII):1–123 World Health Organization (2001) Laboratory manual of the World Health Organization for the examination of human semen and sperm–cervical mucus interaction. Ann Ist Super Sanita (I–XII):1–123
12.
go back to reference Parikh FR, Nandkarni SG, Kamat SG, Naik N, Soonawala SB, Parikh RM (1997) Genital tuberculosis: a major pelvic factor causing infertility in Indian women. Fertil Steril 67:497–500PubMedCrossRef Parikh FR, Nandkarni SG, Kamat SG, Naik N, Soonawala SB, Parikh RM (1997) Genital tuberculosis: a major pelvic factor causing infertility in Indian women. Fertil Steril 67:497–500PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group (2004) Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 81:19–25 Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group (2004) Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 81:19–25
14.
go back to reference Zeyneloglu HB, Arici A, Duleba AJ (1998) Comparison of intrauterine insemination with timed intercourse in superovulated cycles with gonadotropins: a metanalysis. Fertil Steril 69:486–491PubMedCrossRef Zeyneloglu HB, Arici A, Duleba AJ (1998) Comparison of intrauterine insemination with timed intercourse in superovulated cycles with gonadotropins: a metanalysis. Fertil Steril 69:486–491PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Karande VC, Korn A, Morris R, Rao R, Balin M, Rinehart J (1999) Prospective randomized trial comparing the outcome and cost of in vitro fertilization with that of a traditional treatment algorithm as first-line therapy for couples with infertility. Fertil Steril 71(3):468–475PubMedCrossRef Karande VC, Korn A, Morris R, Rao R, Balin M, Rinehart J (1999) Prospective randomized trial comparing the outcome and cost of in vitro fertilization with that of a traditional treatment algorithm as first-line therapy for couples with infertility. Fertil Steril 71(3):468–475PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Templeton AA, van Look P, Angell RE, Aitken RJ, Lumsden MA, Baird DT (1986) Oocyte recovery and fertilization rates in women at various times after the administration of hCG. J Reprod Fertil 76(2):771–778PubMedCrossRef Templeton AA, van Look P, Angell RE, Aitken RJ, Lumsden MA, Baird DT (1986) Oocyte recovery and fertilization rates in women at various times after the administration of hCG. J Reprod Fertil 76(2):771–778PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Awonuga A, Govindbhai J (1999) Is waiting for an endogenous luteinizing hormone surge and/or administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin of benefit in intrauterine insemination? Hum Reprod 14(7):1765–1770PubMedCrossRef Awonuga A, Govindbhai J (1999) Is waiting for an endogenous luteinizing hormone surge and/or administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin of benefit in intrauterine insemination? Hum Reprod 14(7):1765–1770PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wang YC, Chang YC, Chen IC, Cnien HH, Wu GJ (2006) Comparison of timing of IUI in ovarian stimulated cycles. Arch Androl 52(5):371–374PubMedCrossRef Wang YC, Chang YC, Chen IC, Cnien HH, Wu GJ (2006) Comparison of timing of IUI in ovarian stimulated cycles. Arch Androl 52(5):371–374PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pryor JL, Kuneck P, Blatz SM et al (2001) Delayed timing of intrauterine insemination results in a significantly improved pregnancy rate in female partners of quadriplegic men. Fertil Steril 76:1130–1135PubMedCrossRef Pryor JL, Kuneck P, Blatz SM et al (2001) Delayed timing of intrauterine insemination results in a significantly improved pregnancy rate in female partners of quadriplegic men. Fertil Steril 76:1130–1135PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sunde A, Kahn JA, Molne K (1988) Intrauterine insemination: a European collaborative report. Hum Reprod 2:69–73 Sunde A, Kahn JA, Molne K (1988) Intrauterine insemination: a European collaborative report. Hum Reprod 2:69–73
21.
go back to reference Edwards RG, Steptoe PC (1974) Control of human ovulation, fertilization and implantation. Proc R Soc Med 67:932–9359PubMed Edwards RG, Steptoe PC (1974) Control of human ovulation, fertilization and implantation. Proc R Soc Med 67:932–9359PubMed
22.
go back to reference Kucuk T (2008) Intrauterine insemination: is the timing correct? J Assist Reprod Genet 25(8):427–430 (Epub 2 Sep 2008)PubMedCrossRef Kucuk T (2008) Intrauterine insemination: is the timing correct? J Assist Reprod Genet 25(8):427–430 (Epub 2 Sep 2008)PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Peterson CM, Hatasaka HH, Jones KP et al (1994) Ovulation induction with gonadotropins and intrauterine insemination compared with in vitro fertilization and no therapy: a prospective, nonrandomized, cohort study and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 62:535–544PubMed Peterson CM, Hatasaka HH, Jones KP et al (1994) Ovulation induction with gonadotropins and intrauterine insemination compared with in vitro fertilization and no therapy: a prospective, nonrandomized, cohort study and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 62:535–544PubMed
24.
go back to reference Brzechffa PR, Daneshmand S, Buyalos RP (1998) Sequential clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin with intrauterine insemination: the effect of patient age on clinical outcome. Hum Reprod 13:2110–2114PubMedCrossRef Brzechffa PR, Daneshmand S, Buyalos RP (1998) Sequential clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin with intrauterine insemination: the effect of patient age on clinical outcome. Hum Reprod 13:2110–2114PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tomilson MJ, Amissah-Arthur JB, Thompson KA, Kasraie JL, Bentick B (1996) Prognostic indicators for IUI: statistical model for IUI success. Hum Reprod 11(9):1892–1896 Tomilson MJ, Amissah-Arthur JB, Thompson KA, Kasraie JL, Bentick B (1996) Prognostic indicators for IUI: statistical model for IUI success. Hum Reprod 11(9):1892–1896
26.
go back to reference Rahman SM, Malhotra N, Kumar S, Roy KK, Agarwal A (2010) A randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of single versus double intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 94(7):2913–2915 (Epub 1 Aug 2010)PubMedCrossRef Rahman SM, Malhotra N, Kumar S, Roy KK, Agarwal A (2010) A randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of single versus double intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 94(7):2913–2915 (Epub 1 Aug 2010)PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Chavkin D, Molinaro T, Roe A, Sammel M, Dokras A (2011) Donor sperm insemination cycles: are two inseminations better than one? J Androl (Epub ahead of print) Chavkin D, Molinaro T, Roe A, Sammel M, Dokras A (2011) Donor sperm insemination cycles: are two inseminations better than one? J Androl (Epub ahead of print)
Metadata
Title
Timing of intrauterine insemination: an attempt to unravel the enigma
Authors
Syed Monajatur Rahman
Debjyoti Karmakar
Neena Malhotra
Sunesh Kumar
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1950-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2011 Go to the issue