Top

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Published in:

01-10-2011 | Materno-fetal Medicine

Transvaginal ultrasound of cervical length and its correlation to digital cervical examination, time to spontaneous labor and mode of delivery

Authors: Chad A. Grotegut, Mordechai Dulitzki, John P. Gaughan, Reuven Achiron, Eyal Schiff, Ossie Geifman-Holtzman

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2011

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study was to determine if transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) examination of cervical length correlates to digital pelvic examination and if it can predict time to and mode of delivery in term pregnancies.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study of 726 consecutive non-laboring, term pregnant women presenting to University-based antenatal testing unit between 1 July 2001 and 31 March 2002. Subjects underwent a TVUS for cervical length followed by a digital cervical examination by a physician blinded to the results of the ultrasound. Linear regression analysis was used to correlate the findings of cervical length by ultrasound with cervical dilatation and effacement by digital examination.

Results

In 726 women, the relationship between TVUS cervical length and cervical dilatation and effacement measured digitally were found to be significantly related (p < 0.001), but weak, with a 15 and 23% goodness of fit, respectively, based on the linear model. Using multivariate logistic and linear regression, respectively, TVUS cervical length predicted mode of delivery but did not predict time to spontaneous labor. Digital measurement of cervical dilatation was predictive of time to spontaneous labor.

Conclusions

There is a statistically significant correlation between TVUS measurement of cervical length and digital cervical exam though the correlation is weak. TVUS measurement of cervical length was predictive of mode of delivery while controlling for digital cervical examination, parity and time to spontaneous labor. Digital cervical dilatation was predictive of time to spontaneous delivery.

Bishop EH (1964) Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 24:266–268PubMed

Friedman EA, Niswander KR, Bayonet-Rivera NP, Sachtleben MR (1966) Relation of prelabor evaluation to inducibility and the course of labor. Obstet Gynecol 28(4):495–501PubMed

Hughey MJ, McElin TW, Bird CC (1976) An evaluation of preinduction scoring systems. Obstet Gynecol 48(6):635–641PubMed

Dhall K, Mittal SC, Kumar A (1987) Evaluation of preinduction scoring systems. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 27(4):309–311CrossRef

Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A et al (1996) The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med 334(9):567–572PubMedCrossRef

Reis FM, Gervasi MT, Florio P, Bracalente G, Fadalti M, Severi FM et al (2003) Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(5):1361–1367PubMedCrossRef

Chandra S, Crane JM, Hutchens D, Young DC (2001) Transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination in predicting successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 98(1):2–6PubMedCrossRef

Boozarjomehri F, Timor-Tritsch I, Chao CR, Fox HE (1994) Transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix before labor: presence of cervical wedging is associated with shorter duration of induced labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171(4):1081–1087PubMed

Watson WJ, Stevens D, Welter S, Day D (1996) Factors predicting successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 88(6):990–992PubMedCrossRef

10.

Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Ramanathan VG, Thompson MO, Nicolaides KH (2001) Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18(6):623–628PubMedCrossRef

11.

Ware V, Raynor BD (2000) Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182(5):1030–1032PubMedCrossRef

12.

Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Hessabi M (2000) Comparison of the Bishop score, ultrasonographically measured cervical length, and fetal fibronectin assay in predicting time until delivery and type of delivery at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182(1 Pt 1):108–113PubMedCrossRef

13.

Vankayalapati P, Sethna F, Roberts N, Ngeh N, Thilaganathan B, Bhide A (2008) Ultrasound assessment of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: prediction of spontaneous onset of labor and successful vaginal delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31(3):328–331PubMedCrossRef

14.

Ramanathan G, Yu C, Osei E, Nicolaides KH (2003) Ultrasound examination at 37 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of pregnancy outcome: the value of cervical assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22(6):598–603PubMedCrossRef

15.

Yanik A, Gulumser C, Tosun M (2007) Ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length in predicting mode of delivery after oxytocin induction. Adv Ther 24(4):748–756PubMedCrossRef

16.

Elghorori MR, Hassan I, Dartey W, Abdel-Aziz E, Bradley M (2006) Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol 26(6):521–526PubMedCrossRef

17.

Jackson GM, Ludmir J, Bader TJ (1992) The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical length. Obstet Gynecol 79(2):214–218PubMed

18.

Holcomb WL Jr, Smeltzer JS (1991) Cervical effacement: variation in belief among clinicians. Obstet Gynecol 78(1):43–45PubMed

19.

Sonek JD, Iams JD, Blumenfeld M, Johnson F, Landon M, Gabbe S (1990) Measurement of cervical length in pregnancy: comparison between vaginal ultrasonography and digital examination. Obstet Gynecol 76(2):172–175PubMed

20.

Andersen HF (1991) Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 19(2):77–83PubMedCrossRef

21.

Daskalakis G, Thomakos N, Hatziioannou L, Mesogitis S, Papantoniou N, Antsaklis A (2006) Sonographic cervical length measurement before labor induction in term nulliparous women. Fetal Diagn Ther 21(1):34–38PubMedCrossRef

22.

Gabriel R, Darnaud T, Chalot F, Gonzalez N, Leymarie F, Quereux C (2002) Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19(3):254–257PubMedCrossRef

Title: Transvaginal ultrasound of cervical length and its correlation to digital cervical examination, time to spontaneous labor and mode of delivery
Authors: Chad A. Grotegut
Mordechai Dulitzki
John P. Gaughan
Reuven Achiron
Eyal Schiff
Ossie Geifman-Holtzman
Publication date: 01-10-2011
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1745-1

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Transvaginal ultrasound of cervical length and its correlation to digital cervical examination, time to spontaneous labor and mode of delivery

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Pregnancy, obesity, gestational weight gain, and parity as predictors of peripartum complications

Synchronous ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma with a functioning stroma and endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma by different loss of heterozygosity findings

The assessment of voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography

Schizophrenia and Stein–Leventhal syndrome: comorbidity features

Pregnancy management in women within the bladder–exstrophy–epispadias complex (BEEC) after continent urinary diversion

Anatomical study of position of the TVT-O to the obturator nerve influenced by the position of the legs during the procedure: based upon findings at formalin-embalmed and fresh-frozen bodies