Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2011

01-10-2011 | Materno-fetal Medicine

The echogenicity of the normal fetal kidneys during different stages of pregnancy determined objectively

Authors: Reli Hershkovitz, Keren Amichay, Gideon Y. Stein, Ronnie Tepper

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine echogenicity of normal fetal kidneys during pregnancy by objective computerized method.

Methods

Computerized-based numerical method was developed, quantifying echogenicity of kidneys. 166 digital pictures of kidneys and liver were collected between 14 and 41 weeks of gestation. Calculating liver echogenicity was used to overcome gain problems. Women were healthy, delivered normal babies. Digital pictures were processed by software capable of identifying and labeling 256 shades of gray, numerically. In each picture, kidney was identified, region of interest was outlined. Average, standard deviation and entropy of pixel values were calculated and divided into three: 14–24, 24–36, 37–41 weeks of gestation: early, intermediate, late.

Results

Mean color intensities were 70.2 ± 23, 50.6 ± 17, 47.3 ± 14 for early, intermediate, late groups, respectively (p < 0.0001, comparison between early and other groups). Standard deviation, which represents the echogenic homogenicity of the kidney, was 18 ± 4, 16.5 ± 3 and 17.2 ± 3 pixels for early, intermediate, and late, respectively (p = 0.003, between early and intermediate groups; p = 0.03, between the intermediate and late). Liver echogenicity remained constant throughout pregnancy.

Conclusions

Objective sonographic assessment of the echogenicity of the fetal kidney is presented here for the first time. It was found that kidneys are more echogenic during early pregnancy and more homogenous in appearance in mid-gestation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Benacerraf BR (1998) Fetal abnormalities with borderline significance: the gray zone in fetal diagnosis. In: Bergl Benacerraf (ed) Ultrasound of fetal syndromes. Churchill Livingstone, New York Benacerraf BR (1998) Fetal abnormalities with borderline significance: the gray zone in fetal diagnosis. In: Bergl Benacerraf (ed) Ultrasound of fetal syndromes. Churchill Livingstone, New York
2.
go back to reference Estroff JA, Mandell J, Benacerraf BR (1991) Increased renal parenchymal echogenicity in fetus: importance and clinical outcome. Radiology 181:135–139PubMed Estroff JA, Mandell J, Benacerraf BR (1991) Increased renal parenchymal echogenicity in fetus: importance and clinical outcome. Radiology 181:135–139PubMed
3.
go back to reference Tsatsaris V, Gagnadoux MF, Aubry MC, Gubler MC, Dumez Y, Dommergues M (2002) Prenatal diagnosis of bilateral isolated fetal hyperechogenic kidneys. Is it possible to predict long term outcome? BJOG 109:1388–1393PubMedCrossRef Tsatsaris V, Gagnadoux MF, Aubry MC, Gubler MC, Dumez Y, Dommergues M (2002) Prenatal diagnosis of bilateral isolated fetal hyperechogenic kidneys. Is it possible to predict long term outcome? BJOG 109:1388–1393PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Suranyi A, Christine R, Rigo J, Schaaps JP, Foidart JM (2001) Fetal renal hyperechogenicity in intrauterine growth retardation: importance and outcome. Pediatr Nephrol 16:575–580PubMedCrossRef Suranyi A, Christine R, Rigo J, Schaaps JP, Foidart JM (2001) Fetal renal hyperechogenicity in intrauterine growth retardation: importance and outcome. Pediatr Nephrol 16:575–580PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Carr MC, Benacerraf BR, Estroff JA, Mandell J (1995) Prenatally diagnosed bilateral hyperechoic kidneys with normal amniotic fluid: postnatal outcome. J Urol 153:442–444PubMedCrossRef Carr MC, Benacerraf BR, Estroff JA, Mandell J (1995) Prenatally diagnosed bilateral hyperechoic kidneys with normal amniotic fluid: postnatal outcome. J Urol 153:442–444PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nyberg DA (2003) Diagnostic imaging of fetal anomalies. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia Nyberg DA (2003) Diagnostic imaging of fetal anomalies. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
7.
go back to reference Brasseur-Daudruy M, Garel C, Brossard V, Broux F, Heckettsweiler B, Eurin D (2006) Hyper-echogenic colon: a prenatal sign of cystinuria? Prenat Diagn 26:1254–1255PubMedCrossRef Brasseur-Daudruy M, Garel C, Brossard V, Broux F, Heckettsweiler B, Eurin D (2006) Hyper-echogenic colon: a prenatal sign of cystinuria? Prenat Diagn 26:1254–1255PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mashiach R, Davidovits M, Eisenstein B, Kidron D, Kovo M, Shalev J, Merlob P, Vardimon D, Efrat Z, Meizner I (2005) Fetal hyperechogenic kidney with normal amniotic fluid volume: a diagnostic dilemma. Prenat Diagn 25:553–558PubMedCrossRef Mashiach R, Davidovits M, Eisenstein B, Kidron D, Kovo M, Shalev J, Merlob P, Vardimon D, Efrat Z, Meizner I (2005) Fetal hyperechogenic kidney with normal amniotic fluid volume: a diagnostic dilemma. Prenat Diagn 25:553–558PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Manley JA, O’Neill WC (2001) How echogenic is echogenic? Quantitative acoustics of the renal cortex. Am J Kidney Dis 37:706–711PubMedCrossRef Manley JA, O’Neill WC (2001) How echogenic is echogenic? Quantitative acoustics of the renal cortex. Am J Kidney Dis 37:706–711PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lee HJ, Cho JY (2003) Quantitative assessment of the fetal bowel echogenicity: comparison of harmonic, and fundamental sonographic images. J Clin Ultrasound 31:302–307PubMedCrossRef Lee HJ, Cho JY (2003) Quantitative assessment of the fetal bowel echogenicity: comparison of harmonic, and fundamental sonographic images. J Clin Ultrasound 31:302–307PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The echogenicity of the normal fetal kidneys during different stages of pregnancy determined objectively
Authors
Reli Hershkovitz
Keren Amichay
Gideon Y. Stein
Ronnie Tepper
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1738-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2011 Go to the issue