Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2011

01-05-2011 | Materno-fetal Medicine

The value of bladder filling in addition to manual elevation of presenting fetal part in cases of cord prolapse

Authors: Ilia Bord, Ofer Gemer, Eyal Y. Anteby, Simon Shenhav

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To compare perinatal outcome of deliveries complicated by cord prolapse between cases in which bladder filling was performed in addition to supporting presenting part and cases where only support was employed.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of 44 deliveries complicated by prolapse occurring after admission was made. The first group included 29 patients who were rushed to a cesarean section with doctor’s hand inside the vagina pushing the presenting part. The second group of 15 patients, included women whose bladder was filled with 500 cc of normal saline in addition to manual support.

Results

Time to delivery was similar in the first and second group (19.7 ± 9.46 and 21.6 ± 11.9, P = 0.57; respectively) as well as the mean neonatal pH values (7.28 ± 0.09 and 7.26 ± 0.07, P = 0.55; respectively). There was no significant difference in proportion of neonates with an Apgar score of less than 7 between the two arms.

Conclusion

The addition of bladder filling to further displace the presenting part did not improve the neonatal outcome which was not compromised regardless of the measures employed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Savage EW, Kohi SG, Wynn RM (1970) Prolapse of the umbilical cord. Obstet Gynecol 35:502–509 Savage EW, Kohi SG, Wynn RM (1970) Prolapse of the umbilical cord. Obstet Gynecol 35:502–509
2.
go back to reference Cushner IM (1961) Prolapse of the umbilical cord, including a follow-up of fetal survivors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 81:666–680PubMed Cushner IM (1961) Prolapse of the umbilical cord, including a follow-up of fetal survivors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 81:666–680PubMed
3.
go back to reference Kahana B, Sheiner E, Levy A, Lazer S, Mazor M (2004) Umbilical cord prolapse and perinatal outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 84:127–132PubMedCrossRef Kahana B, Sheiner E, Levy A, Lazer S, Mazor M (2004) Umbilical cord prolapse and perinatal outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 84:127–132PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Critchlow CW, Leet TL, Benedetti TJ, Daling JR (1994) Risk factors and infant outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse: a population-based case–control study among births in Washington State. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:613–618PubMed Critchlow CW, Leet TL, Benedetti TJ, Daling JR (1994) Risk factors and infant outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse: a population-based case–control study among births in Washington State. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:613–618PubMed
5.
go back to reference Koonings PP, Paul RH, Campbell K (1990) Umbilical cord prolapse: a contemporary look. J Rep Med 35:690–692 Koonings PP, Paul RH, Campbell K (1990) Umbilical cord prolapse: a contemporary look. J Rep Med 35:690–692
6.
go back to reference Boyle JJ, Katz WL (2005) Umbilical cord prolapse in current obstetric practice. J Rep Med 50:303–306 Boyle JJ, Katz WL (2005) Umbilical cord prolapse in current obstetric practice. J Rep Med 50:303–306
7.
go back to reference Uygur D, Kis S, Tuncer R, Ozcan FS, Erkaya S (2002) Risk factors and infant outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Int J Obstet Gynaecol 78:127–130CrossRef Uygur D, Kis S, Tuncer R, Ozcan FS, Erkaya S (2002) Risk factors and infant outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Int J Obstet Gynaecol 78:127–130CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yla-Outinen A, Heinonen PK, Tuimala R (2005) Predisposing and risk factors of umbilical cord prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 64:567–570CrossRef Yla-Outinen A, Heinonen PK, Tuimala R (2005) Predisposing and risk factors of umbilical cord prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 64:567–570CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Usta IM, Mercer BM, Sibai BM (1999) Current obstetrical practice and umbilical cord prolapse. Am J Perinatol 16:479–484PubMedCrossRef Usta IM, Mercer BM, Sibai BM (1999) Current obstetrical practice and umbilical cord prolapse. Am J Perinatol 16:479–484PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Katz Z, Lancet M, Borenstein R (1982) Management of labor with umbilical cord prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:239–241PubMed Katz Z, Lancet M, Borenstein R (1982) Management of labor with umbilical cord prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:239–241PubMed
11.
go back to reference Duval C, Lemoine JP, Demory JE (1987) Procidence du cordon ombilical: 79 procidences (Prolapse of the umbilical cord: 79 prolapses) (in French). Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 82:163–167PubMed Duval C, Lemoine JP, Demory JE (1987) Procidence du cordon ombilical: 79 procidences (Prolapse of the umbilical cord: 79 prolapses) (in French). Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 82:163–167PubMed
12.
go back to reference Vago T (1970) Prolapse of the umbilical cord: a method of management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 107:967–969PubMed Vago T (1970) Prolapse of the umbilical cord: a method of management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 107:967–969PubMed
13.
go back to reference Katz Z, Shoham Z, Lancet M, Blickstein I, Mogilnet BM, Zalel Y (1988) Management of labor with umbilical cord prolapse: a 5-year study. Obstet Gynecol 72:278–280PubMed Katz Z, Shoham Z, Lancet M, Blickstein I, Mogilnet BM, Zalel Y (1988) Management of labor with umbilical cord prolapse: a 5-year study. Obstet Gynecol 72:278–280PubMed
14.
Metadata
Title
The value of bladder filling in addition to manual elevation of presenting fetal part in cases of cord prolapse
Authors
Ilia Bord
Ofer Gemer
Eyal Y. Anteby
Simon Shenhav
Publication date
01-05-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1509-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2011 Go to the issue