Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2011

01-04-2011 | General Gynecology

Feasibility of office hysteroscopy through the “see and treat technique” in private practice: a prospective observational study

Authors: Charalampos Siristatidis, Charalampos Chrelias

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to examine the feasibility of office hysteroscopy through the no-touch “see and treat technique” in a routine basis in private practice.

Methods

In the private practice of two trained gynecologists, women with an indication for further investigation of the uterine cavity were treated with the technique. A total of 112 consecutive women were prospectively allocated to a “no-touch” and “see and treat” technique of hysteroscopy. Neither anaesthesia nor analgesia was used as soon as criteria were met. Hysteroscopy was performed using a rigid 3.4-mm hysteroscope and a medium of 0.9% saline.

Results

Treatment efficacy and patient compliance were evaluated through scores on a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, complications and success rates, along with the symphony between hysteroscopic findings and histology. The patients’ pain score on the VAS was low and only in 2 out of 112 cases there was a marked discomfort. In four cases suggested treatment was not successful, because of the fear of the patient. In 60.71% of cases that hysteroscopy was indicated, the uterine cavity was normal. No complications or adverse effects were noted. Apart from one case, there was a full agreement between hysteroscopic findings and histology.

Conclusion

Office hysteroscopy is a successful and well-tolerated procedure. Through adequate expertise it should be considered the method of choice in private basis, at the same time when exploration of the uterine cavity is needed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bettocchi S, Nappi L, Ceci O, Selvaggi L (2003) What does ‘diagnostic hysteroscopy’ mean today? The role of the new techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 15:303–308PubMedCrossRef Bettocchi S, Nappi L, Ceci O, Selvaggi L (2003) What does ‘diagnostic hysteroscopy’ mean today? The role of the new techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 15:303–308PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Campo R, Van Belle Y, Rombauts L, Brosens I, Gordts S (1999) Office minihysteroscopy. Hum Reprod Update 5:73–81PubMedCrossRef Campo R, Van Belle Y, Rombauts L, Brosens I, Gordts S (1999) Office minihysteroscopy. Hum Reprod Update 5:73–81PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Isaacson K (2002) Office hysteroscopy: a valuable but under-utilized technique. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14:381–385PubMedCrossRef Isaacson K (2002) Office hysteroscopy: a valuable but under-utilized technique. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14:381–385PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bettocchi S, Selvaggi L (1997) A vaginoscopic approach to reduce the pain of office hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4:255–258PubMedCrossRef Bettocchi S, Selvaggi L (1997) A vaginoscopic approach to reduce the pain of office hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4:255–258PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nichols M, Carter JE, Fylsta DL et al (2006) A comparative study of hysteroscopic sterilization performed in-office versus a hospital operating room. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13:447–450PubMedCrossRef Nichols M, Carter JE, Fylsta DL et al (2006) A comparative study of hysteroscopic sterilization performed in-office versus a hospital operating room. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13:447–450PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Papalampros P, Gambadauro P, Papadopoulos N et al (2009) The mini-resectoscope: a new instrument for office hysteroscopic surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:227–230PubMedCrossRef Papalampros P, Gambadauro P, Papadopoulos N et al (2009) The mini-resectoscope: a new instrument for office hysteroscopic surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:227–230PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Molinas CR, Campo R (2006) Office hysteroscopy and adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20:557–567PubMedCrossRef Molinas CR, Campo R (2006) Office hysteroscopy and adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20:557–567PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schmidt T, Breidenbach M, Nawroth F et al (2009) Hysteroscopy for asymptomatic postmenopausal women with sonographically thickened endometrium. Maturitas 62:176–178PubMedCrossRef Schmidt T, Breidenbach M, Nawroth F et al (2009) Hysteroscopy for asymptomatic postmenopausal women with sonographically thickened endometrium. Maturitas 62:176–178PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference El-Toukhy T, Sunkara SK, Coomarasamy A, Grace J, Khalaf Y (2008) Outpatient hysteroscopy and subsequent IVF cycle outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 16:712–719PubMedCrossRef El-Toukhy T, Sunkara SK, Coomarasamy A, Grace J, Khalaf Y (2008) Outpatient hysteroscopy and subsequent IVF cycle outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 16:712–719PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bosteels J, Weyers S, Puttemans P et al (2010) The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in improving pregnancy rates in subfertile women without other gynaecological symptoms: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 16:1–11PubMedCrossRef Bosteels J, Weyers S, Puttemans P et al (2010) The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in improving pregnancy rates in subfertile women without other gynaecological symptoms: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 16:1–11PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Campo R, Molinas CR, Rombauts L et al (2005) Prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate factors influencing the success rate of office diagnostic hysteroscopy. Hum Reprod 20:258–263PubMedCrossRef Campo R, Molinas CR, Rombauts L et al (2005) Prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate factors influencing the success rate of office diagnostic hysteroscopy. Hum Reprod 20:258–263PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference De Angelis C, Santoro G, Re ME, Nofroni I (2003) Office hysteroscopy and compliance: mini-hysteroscopy versus traditional hysteroscopy in a randomized trial. Hum Reprod 18:2441–2445PubMedCrossRef De Angelis C, Santoro G, Re ME, Nofroni I (2003) Office hysteroscopy and compliance: mini-hysteroscopy versus traditional hysteroscopy in a randomized trial. Hum Reprod 18:2441–2445PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Van Dongen H, de Kroon CD, van den Tillaart SA et al (2008) A randomised comparison of vaginoscopic office hysteroscopy and saline infusion sonography: a patient compliance study. BJOG 115:1232–1237PubMedCrossRef Van Dongen H, de Kroon CD, van den Tillaart SA et al (2008) A randomised comparison of vaginoscopic office hysteroscopy and saline infusion sonography: a patient compliance study. BJOG 115:1232–1237PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wamsteker K, Emanuel MH, de Kruif JH (1993) Transcervical hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids for abnormal uterine bleeding: results regarding the degree of intramural extension. Obstet Gynecol 82:736–740PubMed Wamsteker K, Emanuel MH, de Kruif JH (1993) Transcervical hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids for abnormal uterine bleeding: results regarding the degree of intramural extension. Obstet Gynecol 82:736–740PubMed
15.
go back to reference Bettocchi S, Ceci O, Nappi L et al (2004) Operative office hysteroscopy without anesthesia: analysis of 4863 cases performed with mechanical instruments. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11:59–61PubMedCrossRef Bettocchi S, Ceci O, Nappi L et al (2004) Operative office hysteroscopy without anesthesia: analysis of 4863 cases performed with mechanical instruments. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11:59–61PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Guida M, Di Spezio Sardo A, Acunzo G et al (2006) Vaginoscopic versus traditional office hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod 21:3253–3257PubMedCrossRef Guida M, Di Spezio Sardo A, Acunzo G et al (2006) Vaginoscopic versus traditional office hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod 21:3253–3257PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bettocchi S, Ceci O, Di Venere R et al (2002) Advanced operative office hysteroscopy without anaesthesia: analysis of 501 cases treated with a 5 Fr. bipolar electrode. Hum Reprod 17:2435–2438PubMedCrossRef Bettocchi S, Ceci O, Di Venere R et al (2002) Advanced operative office hysteroscopy without anaesthesia: analysis of 501 cases treated with a 5 Fr. bipolar electrode. Hum Reprod 17:2435–2438PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Litta P, Cosmi E, Saccardi C et al (2008) Outpatient operative polypectomy using a 5 mm-hysteroscope without anaesthesia and/or analgesia advantages and limits. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 139:120–124CrossRef Litta P, Cosmi E, Saccardi C et al (2008) Outpatient operative polypectomy using a 5 mm-hysteroscope without anaesthesia and/or analgesia advantages and limits. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 139:120–124CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Svirsky R, Smorgick N, Rozowski U et al (2008) Can we rely on blind endometrial biopsy for detection of focal intrauterine pathology? Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:115e1–115e3CrossRef Svirsky R, Smorgick N, Rozowski U et al (2008) Can we rely on blind endometrial biopsy for detection of focal intrauterine pathology? Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:115e1–115e3CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Feasibility of office hysteroscopy through the “see and treat technique” in private practice: a prospective observational study
Authors
Charalampos Siristatidis
Charalampos Chrelias
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1431-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2011 Go to the issue