Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2007

01-01-2007 | Original Article

Effect of prepregnancy body mass index categories on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes

Authors: Haim A. Abenhaim, Robert A. Kinch, Lucie Morin, Alice Benjamin, Robert Usher

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To examine the association between body mass index (BMI) and obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a cohort study comparing prepregnant BMI categories with obstetrical and neonatal outcomes using the McGill Obstetrical and Neonatal Database on all deliveries in 10 year period (1987–1997). Prepregnant BMI was categorized into underweight (<20), normal (20–24.9), overweight (25–29.9), obese (30–39.9), and morbidly obese (40+). Logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for age, smoking, parity, and preexisting diabetes using normal BMI as the reference.

Results

The population consisted of underweight 4,312 (23.1%), normal weight 10,021 (53.8%), overweight 3,069 (16.5%), obese 1,137 (6.1%), and morbidly obese 104 (0.6%). As compared to women with normal BMIs, overweight, obese, and morbidly obese women had an increased risk of preeclampsia 2.28 (1.88–2.77), 4.65 (3.71–5.83), 6.26 (3.48–11.26); gestational hypertension 1.56 (1.35–1.81), 2.01 (1.64–2.45), 2.77 (1.60–4.78); gestational diabetes 1.89 (1.63–2.19), 3.22 (2.68–3.87), 4.71 (2.89–7.67); preterm birth 1.20 (1.04–1.38), 1.60 (1.32–1.94), 2.43 (1.46–4.05); cesarean section 1.48 (1.35–1.62), 1.85 (1.62–2.11), 2.92 (1.97–4.34); and macrosomia 1.66 (1.23–2.24), 2.32 (1.58–3.41), 2.10 (0.64–6.86). Underweight women were less likely to have: preeclampsia 0.67 (0.52–0.86), gestational hypertension 0.71 (0.60–0.83), gestational diabetes 0.82 (0.69–0.97), cesarean section 0.89 (0.81–0.97), shoulder dystocia 0.88 (0.80–0.96), birth injuries 0.40 (0.21–0.77), and macrosomia 0.43 (0.28–0.68) but more likely to have small for gestational age infants 1.54 (1.37–1.72) and intrauterine growth restricted infants 1.33 (1.07–1.67).

Conclusion

In a large Canadian teaching hospital, increasing prepregnancy BMI category was associated with an increasing risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Underweight prepregnancy BMI was associated with a reduced risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wilding J (1997) Science, medicine, and the future: obesity treatment. BMJ 315:997–1000PubMed Wilding J (1997) Science, medicine, and the future: obesity treatment. BMJ 315:997–1000PubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Allison DB, Saunders SE (2000) Obesity in North America: an overview. Med Clin North Am 84:305–332PubMedCrossRef Allison DB, Saunders SE (2000) Obesity in North America: an overview. Med Clin North Am 84:305–332PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bianco AT, Smilen SW, Davis Y, Lopez S, Lapinski R, Lockwood CJ (1998) Pregnancy outcome and weight gain recommendations for the morbidly obese women. Obstet Gynecol 97:97–102CrossRef Bianco AT, Smilen SW, Davis Y, Lopez S, Lapinski R, Lockwood CJ (1998) Pregnancy outcome and weight gain recommendations for the morbidly obese women. Obstet Gynecol 97:97–102CrossRef
5.
go back to reference De Groot LC (1999) High maternal body weight and pregnancy outcome. Nutr Rev 57:62–64PubMed De Groot LC (1999) High maternal body weight and pregnancy outcome. Nutr Rev 57:62–64PubMed
6.
go back to reference Sebire NJ (2001) Is maternal underweight really a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome? A population-based study in London. BJOG 108:61–66PubMedCrossRef Sebire NJ (2001) Is maternal underweight really a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome? A population-based study in London. BJOG 108:61–66PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cnattingius S, Bergstrom R, Lipworth L, Kramer MS (1998) Prepregnancy weight and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 338:147–152PubMedCrossRef Cnattingius S, Bergstrom R, Lipworth L, Kramer MS (1998) Prepregnancy weight and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 338:147–152PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bowers J (1999) Obesity and related pregnancy complications in an inner-city clinic. J Perinatol 19:216–219PubMedCrossRef Bowers J (1999) Obesity and related pregnancy complications in an inner-city clinic. J Perinatol 19:216–219PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Michlin R (2000) Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome. Isr Med Assoc J 2:10–13PubMed Michlin R (2000) Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome. Isr Med Assoc J 2:10–13PubMed
10.
go back to reference Usher R, McLean F (1969) Intrauterine growth of live born Caucasian infants at sea level; Standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeks’gestation. J Pediatr 74:901PubMedCrossRef Usher R, McLean F (1969) Intrauterine growth of live born Caucasian infants at sea level; Standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeks’gestation. J Pediatr 74:901PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute Obesity Education Initiative Expert Panel (1998) Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. Obes Res 6(Suppl 2):51S–209S National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute Obesity Education Initiative Expert Panel (1998) Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. Obes Res 6(Suppl 2):51S–209S
12.
go back to reference Hortobagyi T, Israel RG, O’Brien KF (1994) Sensitivity and specificity of the Quetelet index to assess obesity in men and women. Eur J Clin Nutr 48:369–375PubMed Hortobagyi T, Israel RG, O’Brien KF (1994) Sensitivity and specificity of the Quetelet index to assess obesity in men and women. Eur J Clin Nutr 48:369–375PubMed
13.
go back to reference Heymsfield SB, Allison DB, Heshka S, Pierson RN Jr (1995) Assessment of human body composition. In: Allison DB (ed) Handbook of assessment methods for eating behavior and weight related problems: measures, theory, and research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 515–560 Heymsfield SB, Allison DB, Heshka S, Pierson RN Jr (1995) Assessment of human body composition. In: Allison DB (ed) Handbook of assessment methods for eating behavior and weight related problems: measures, theory, and research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 515–560
14.
go back to reference Gallagher D, Visser M, Sepulveda D, Pierson RN, Harris T, Heymsfield SB (1996) How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex, and ethnic groups. Am J Epidemiol 143:228–239PubMed Gallagher D, Visser M, Sepulveda D, Pierson RN, Harris T, Heymsfield SB (1996) How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex, and ethnic groups. Am J Epidemiol 143:228–239PubMed
15.
go back to reference Troiano RP, Frongillo EA, Sobal J, Levstsky DA (1996) The relationship between body weight and mortality: a quantitative analysis of combined information from existing studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 20:63–75PubMed Troiano RP, Frongillo EA, Sobal J, Levstsky DA (1996) The relationship between body weight and mortality: a quantitative analysis of combined information from existing studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 20:63–75PubMed
16.
go back to reference Wolfe HM, Zador IE, Gross TL, Martier SS, Sokol RJ (1991) The clinical utility of maternal body mass index in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 164:1306–1310PubMed Wolfe HM, Zador IE, Gross TL, Martier SS, Sokol RJ (1991) The clinical utility of maternal body mass index in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 164:1306–1310PubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of prepregnancy body mass index categories on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes
Authors
Haim A. Abenhaim
Robert A. Kinch
Lucie Morin
Alice Benjamin
Robert Usher
Publication date
01-01-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0219-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2007 Go to the issue