Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Dermatological Research 8/2009

01-09-2009 | Original Paper

The patient benefit index: a novel approach in patient-defined outcomes measurement for skin diseases

Authors: Matthias Augustin, Marc A. Radtke, Ina Zschocke, Christine Blome, Julia Behechtnejad, Ines Schäfer, Michael Reusch, Volker Mielke, Stephan Jeff Rustenbach

Published in: Archives of Dermatological Research | Issue 8/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Evaluation of therapeutic benefits from the patient’s perspective is important in medical decision-making and reimbursement. This study aimed at developing and validating an instrument on patient-defined needs and benefits in dermatology. The questionnaire was developed according to international guidelines. The benefit assessment consists of two steps: before treatment, every patient defines his treatment needs according to a standardized list. After treatment, the patient rates the degree of benefits achieved. A “patient benefit index” (PBI) is calculated by averaging the preference-weighed results of all items. The PBI questionnaire was validated in a sample of 500 patients with ten skin diseases and in a treatment study on 906 patients with acne. The patients defined a broad spectrum of needs and treatment benefits, indicating disease-specific patterns. The PBI showed good feasibility, reliability (Cronbach’s alpha >0.91) and construct validity, high responsiveness, and discrimination between subgroups. The PBI permits valid evaluation of patient-relevant benefits in dermatological treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Augustin M, Amon U, Braathen L, Bullinger M, Gieler U, Klein GF, Schultz-Amlung W (2004) Erfassung von Lebensqualität in der Dermatologie (AWMF-Leitlinie). J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2:802–806. Assessment of quality of life in dermatology (German National Guideline). doi:10.1046/j.1439-0353.2004.04505.x Augustin M, Amon U, Braathen L, Bullinger M, Gieler U, Klein GF, Schultz-Amlung W (2004) Erfassung von Lebensqualität in der Dermatologie (AWMF-Leitlinie). J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2:802–806. Assessment of quality of life in dermatology (German National Guideline). doi:10.​1046/​j.​1439-0353.​2004.​04505.​x
2.
go back to reference Augustin M, Lange S, Wenninger K, Seidenglanz K, Amon U, Zschocke I (2004) Validation of a comprehensive Freiburg life quality assessment (FLQA) core questionnaire and development of a threshold system. Eur J Dermatol 14:107–113PubMed Augustin M, Lange S, Wenninger K, Seidenglanz K, Amon U, Zschocke I (2004) Validation of a comprehensive Freiburg life quality assessment (FLQA) core questionnaire and development of a threshold system. Eur J Dermatol 14:107–113PubMed
3.
go back to reference Augustin M, Zschocke I (2006) Nutzenbewertung der ambulanten und stationären VAC-Therapie aus Patientensicht: Multizenterstudie mit Patienten-relevanten Endpunkten. Fortschr Med Orig 148:25–32. Benefit assessment in ambulant and clinical VAC treatment from the patient’s perspective: multicenter study with patient-relevant endpoints Augustin M, Zschocke I (2006) Nutzenbewertung der ambulanten und stationären VAC-Therapie aus Patientensicht: Multizenterstudie mit Patienten-relevanten Endpunkten. Fortschr Med Orig 148:25–32. Benefit assessment in ambulant and clinical VAC treatment from the patient’s perspective: multicenter study with patient-relevant endpoints
4.
go back to reference Bowling A (1995) Measuring disease: a review of disease-specific quality of life measurement scales. Open University Press, Buckingham Bowling A (1995) Measuring disease: a review of disease-specific quality of life measurement scales. Open University Press, Buckingham
5.
go back to reference Brock D (1996) Quality of Life Measures in Health Care and Medical Ethics. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 487–510 Brock D (1996) Quality of Life Measures in Health Care and Medical Ethics. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 487–510
7.
go back to reference Clark MS, Caudrey DJ (1983) Evaluation of rehabilitation services: the use of goal attainment scaling. Int Rehabil Med 5:41–45PubMed Clark MS, Caudrey DJ (1983) Evaluation of rehabilitation services: the use of goal attainment scaling. Int Rehabil Med 5:41–45PubMed
9.
go back to reference Donnelly C, Carswell A (2002) Individualized outcome measures: a review of the literature. Can J Occup Ther 69:84–94PubMed Donnelly C, Carswell A (2002) Individualized outcome measures: a review of the literature. Can J Occup Ther 69:84–94PubMed
11.
go back to reference Gerdes N (1998) Rehabilitationseffekte bei “zielorientierter Ergebnismessung”: Ergebnisse der IRES-ZOE-Studie 1996/97. Dtsch Rentenversicher 3–4:217–238. Effects of rehabilitation by “goal attainment scaling”: results of the IRES-ZOE study 1996/97 Gerdes N (1998) Rehabilitationseffekte bei “zielorientierter Ergebnismessung”: Ergebnisse der IRES-ZOE-Studie 1996/97. Dtsch Rentenversicher 3–4:217–238. Effects of rehabilitation by “goal attainment scaling”: results of the IRES-ZOE study 1996/97
12.
go back to reference Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R (1996) How to develop and validate a new health-related quality of life instrument. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 49–56 Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R (1996) How to develop and validate a new health-related quality of life instrument. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 49–56
13.
go back to reference Kiresuk T, Sherman R (1968) Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Ment Health J 4:443–453. doi:10.1007/BF01530764 CrossRef Kiresuk T, Sherman R (1968) Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Ment Health J 4:443–453. doi:10.​1007/​BF01530764 CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lienert G (1998) Testaufbau und Testanalyse, 6th edn. Beltz, Weinheim Lienert G (1998) Testaufbau und Testanalyse, 6th edn. Beltz, Weinheim
16.
go back to reference Rychlik R, Rusche H, Augustin M (2004) Systematik der Nutzenbewertung von Arzneimitteln. Gesundh Okon Qual Manage 9:245–252. Systematics of benefit assessment of drugs. doi:10.1055/s-2004-813336 Rychlik R, Rusche H, Augustin M (2004) Systematik der Nutzenbewertung von Arzneimitteln. Gesundh Okon Qual Manage 9:245–252. Systematics of benefit assessment of drugs. doi:10.​1055/​s-2004-813336
17.
go back to reference Steffanowski A, Lichtenberg S, Schmidt J, Huber C, Wittmann WW, Nübling R (2004) Ergebnisqualität psychosomatischer Rehabilitation: Zielerreichungsskalierung auf der Basis einer strukturierten Therapiezielliste. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 43:219–232. Outcome quality of psychosomatic rehabilitation: goal attainment scaling on the basis of a structured catalogue of therapy goals. doi:10.1055/s-2004-828295 Steffanowski A, Lichtenberg S, Schmidt J, Huber C, Wittmann WW, Nübling R (2004) Ergebnisqualität psychosomatischer Rehabilitation: Zielerreichungsskalierung auf der Basis einer strukturierten Therapiezielliste. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 43:219–232. Outcome quality of psychosomatic rehabilitation: goal attainment scaling on the basis of a structured catalogue of therapy goals. doi:10.​1055/​s-2004-828295
18.
go back to reference Steinbook RM, Jacobson AF, Mosher JC, Davies DL (1977) The goal attainment scale: an instructional guide for the delivery of social reinforcement. Arch Gen Psychiatry 34:923–926PubMed Steinbook RM, Jacobson AF, Mosher JC, Davies DL (1977) The goal attainment scale: an instructional guide for the delivery of social reinforcement. Arch Gen Psychiatry 34:923–926PubMed
19.
go back to reference Turnbull J (1998) Evaluating health care using goal attainment scaling. Nurs Stand 12:35–38PubMed Turnbull J (1998) Evaluating health care using goal attainment scaling. Nurs Stand 12:35–38PubMed
20.
go back to reference Zentner A, Velasco-Garrido M, Busse R (2005) Methods for the comparative evaluation of pharmaceuticals. GMS Health Technol Assess 1:Doc09 Zentner A, Velasco-Garrido M, Busse R (2005) Methods for the comparative evaluation of pharmaceuticals. GMS Health Technol Assess 1:Doc09
21.
go back to reference Zschocke I, Hammelmann U, Augustin M (2005) Therapeutischer Nutzen in der dermatologischen Behandlung. Hautarzt 56:839–846. Therapeutic benefit in dermatological treatment. doi:10.1007/s00105-005-0898-5 Zschocke I, Hammelmann U, Augustin M (2005) Therapeutischer Nutzen in der dermatologischen Behandlung. Hautarzt 56:839–846. Therapeutic benefit in dermatological treatment. doi:10.​1007/​s00105-005-0898-5
22.
go back to reference Zwingmann C (2003) Zielorientierte Ergebnismessung (ZOE) mit dem IHRES Patientenfragebogen: Eine kritische Zwischenbilanz. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 42:226–235. Goal oriented measurement with the IRES questionnaire: a critical interim statement. doi:10.1055/s-2003-41646 Zwingmann C (2003) Zielorientierte Ergebnismessung (ZOE) mit dem IHRES Patientenfragebogen: Eine kritische Zwischenbilanz. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 42:226–235. Goal oriented measurement with the IRES questionnaire: a critical interim statement. doi:10.​1055/​s-2003-41646
Metadata
Title
The patient benefit index: a novel approach in patient-defined outcomes measurement for skin diseases
Authors
Matthias Augustin
Marc A. Radtke
Ina Zschocke
Christine Blome
Julia Behechtnejad
Ines Schäfer
Michael Reusch
Volker Mielke
Stephan Jeff Rustenbach
Publication date
01-09-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Dermatological Research / Issue 8/2009
Print ISSN: 0340-3696
Electronic ISSN: 1432-069X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-009-0928-8

Other articles of this Issue 8/2009

Archives of Dermatological Research 8/2009 Go to the issue