Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 6/2018

01-06-2018 | Orthopaedic Surgery

Virtual surgery simulation versus traditional approaches in training of residents in cervical pedicle screw placement

Authors: Yang Hou, Jiangang Shi, Yanping Lin, Huajiang Chen, Wen Yuan

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The cervical screw placement is one of the most difficult procedures in spine surgery, which often needs a long period of repeated practices and could cause screw placement-related complications. We performed this cadaver study to investigate the effectiveness of virtual surgical training system (VSTS) on cervical pedicle screw instrumentation for residents.

Materials and methods

A total of ten novice residents were randomly assigned to two groups: the simulation training (ST) group (n = 5) and control group (n = 5). The ST group received a surgical training of cervical pedicle screw placement on VSTS and the control group was given an introductory teaching session before cadaver test. Ten fresh adult spine specimens including 6 males and 4 females were collected, and were randomly allocated to the two groups. The bilateral C3–C6 pedicle screw instrumentation was performed in the specimens of the two groups, respectively. After instrumentation, screw positions of the two groups were evaluated by image examinations.

Results

There was significantly statistical difference in screw penetration rates between the ST (10%) and control group (62.5%, P < 0.05). The acceptable rates of screws were 100 and 50% in the ST and control groups with significant difference between each other (P < 0.05). In addition, the average screw penetration distance in the ST group (1.12 ± 0.47 mm) was significantly lower than the control group (2.08 ± 0.39 mm, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the VSTS as an advanced training tool exhibited promising effects on improving performance of novice residents in cervical pedicle screw placement compared with the traditional teaching methods.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J et al (2006) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31:291–298CrossRefPubMed Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J et al (2006) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31:291–298CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Ahmad M et al (1977) Projection of the thoracic pedicle and its morphometric analysis. Spine 22:233–238CrossRef Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Ahmad M et al (1977) Projection of the thoracic pedicle and its morphometric analysis. Spine 22:233–238CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lonstein JE, Denis F, Perra JH et al (1999) Complications associated with pedicle screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1519–1528CrossRefPubMed Lonstein JE, Denis F, Perra JH et al (1999) Complications associated with pedicle screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1519–1528CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE et al (2012) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, uroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J 21:247–255CrossRefPubMed Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE et al (2012) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, uroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J 21:247–255CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gautschi OP, Schatlo B, Schaller K et al (2011) Clinically relevant complications related to pedicle screw placement in thoracolumbar surgery and their management: a literature review of 35,630 pedicle screws. Neurosurg Focus 31:E8CrossRefPubMed Gautschi OP, Schatlo B, Schaller K et al (2011) Clinically relevant complications related to pedicle screw placement in thoracolumbar surgery and their management: a literature review of 35,630 pedicle screws. Neurosurg Focus 31:E8CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lee GY, Massicotte EM, Rampersaud YR (2007) Clinical accuracy of cervicothoracic pedicle screw placement: a comparison of the “open” lamino-foraminotomy and computer-assisted techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:25–32CrossRefPubMed Lee GY, Massicotte EM, Rampersaud YR (2007) Clinical accuracy of cervicothoracic pedicle screw placement: a comparison of the “open” lamino-foraminotomy and computer-assisted techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:25–32CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ludwig SC, Kramer DL, Balderston RA et al (2000) Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparison accuracy of three techniques. Spine 25:1655–1667CrossRefPubMed Ludwig SC, Kramer DL, Balderston RA et al (2000) Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparison accuracy of three techniques. Spine 25:1655–1667CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sakai Y, Matsuyama Y, Nakamura H et al (2008) Segmental pedicle screwing for idiopathic scolliosis using computed-assisted surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:181–186CrossRefPubMed Sakai Y, Matsuyama Y, Nakamura H et al (2008) Segmental pedicle screwing for idiopathic scolliosis using computed-assisted surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:181–186CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Mohamed M, Eldin M (2014) Cervical pedicle screw fixation: anatomic feasibility of pedicle morphology and radiologic evaluation of the anatomical measurements. Asian Spine J 8:273–280CrossRef Mohamed M, Eldin M (2014) Cervical pedicle screw fixation: anatomic feasibility of pedicle morphology and radiologic evaluation of the anatomical measurements. Asian Spine J 8:273–280CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cong Y, Bao N, Zhao J (2015) Comparing accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement between a guidance system and manual manipulation: a cadaver study. Med Sci Monit 21:2672–2677CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cong Y, Bao N, Zhao J (2015) Comparing accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement between a guidance system and manual manipulation: a cadaver study. Med Sci Monit 21:2672–2677CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Shimokawa N, Takami T (2017) Surgical safety of cervical pedicle screw placement with computer navigation system. Neurosurg Rev 40:251–258CrossRefPubMed Shimokawa N, Takami T (2017) Surgical safety of cervical pedicle screw placement with computer navigation system. Neurosurg Rev 40:251–258CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lee DH, Lee SW, Kang SJ et al (2011) Optimal entry points and trajectories for cervical pedicle screw placement into subaxial cervical vertebrae. Eur Spine J 20:905–911 Lee DH, Lee SW, Kang SJ et al (2011) Optimal entry points and trajectories for cervical pedicle screw placement into subaxial cervical vertebrae. Eur Spine J 20:905–911
13.
go back to reference Uehara M, Takahashi J, Ogihara N et al (2012) Cervical pedicle screw fixation combined with laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with instability. Asian Spine J 6:241–248CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Uehara M, Takahashi J, Ogihara N et al (2012) Cervical pedicle screw fixation combined with laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with instability. Asian Spine J 6:241–248CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Abumi K (2015) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: posterior decompression and pedicle screw fixation. Eur Spine J 24(Suppl 2):186–196CrossRefPubMed Abumi K (2015) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: posterior decompression and pedicle screw fixation. Eur Spine J 24(Suppl 2):186–196CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Karhade AV, Vasudeva VS, Pompeu YA et al (2016) Image guided spine surgery: available technology and future potential. Austin Neurosurg Open Access 3:1043 Karhade AV, Vasudeva VS, Pompeu YA et al (2016) Image guided spine surgery: available technology and future potential. Austin Neurosurg Open Access 3:1043
16.
17.
go back to reference Harrop J, Rezai AR, Hoh DJ et al (2013) Neurosurgical training with a novel cervical spine simulator: posterior foraminotomy and laminectomy. Neurosurgery 73(Suppl 1):94–99CrossRefPubMed Harrop J, Rezai AR, Hoh DJ et al (2013) Neurosurgical training with a novel cervical spine simulator: posterior foraminotomy and laminectomy. Neurosurgery 73(Suppl 1):94–99CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Gottschalk MB, Yoon ST, Park DK et al (2015) Surgical training using three-dimensional simulation in placement of cervical lateral mass screws: a blinded randomized control trial. Spine J 15:168–175CrossRefPubMed Gottschalk MB, Yoon ST, Park DK et al (2015) Surgical training using three-dimensional simulation in placement of cervical lateral mass screws: a blinded randomized control trial. Spine J 15:168–175CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Virtual surgery simulation versus traditional approaches in training of residents in cervical pedicle screw placement
Authors
Yang Hou
Jiangang Shi
Yanping Lin
Huajiang Chen
Wen Yuan
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2906-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 6/2018 Go to the issue