Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 8/2015

01-08-2015 | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

Quantitative evaluation of residual bony impingement lesions after arthroscopic treatment for isolated pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement using three-dimensional CT

Authors: Hongwu Zhuo, Xuesong Wang, Xin Liu, Guan-yang Song, Yue Li, Hua Feng

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study is to determine the clinical characteristics of residual bony impingement lesions after arthroscopic treatment for pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI); and to determine the effects of residual bony impingement lesions on the clinical outcomes after 2 years of follow-up.

Methods

From December 2010 to January 2012, 42 patients underwent arthroscopic surgery for symptomatic pincer-type FAI. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and satisfaction scores. To quantitatively evaluate the acetabular bony impingement lesions, the acetabular bony impingement angles were measured on three-dimensional CT scans. The incidence and residual rates of residual bony impingement were calculated. According to residual rates, the patients were divided into three groups: group 1, residual rate <10 %; group 2, residual rate 10–20 %; and group 3, residual rate >20 %.

Results

Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 34.5 years. The mean follow-up was 26.3 months. Nineteen cases had residual bony impingement lesions after surgery. The incidence was 63.3 % (19/30). Sixteen cases (84.2 %) had residual bony impingement lesions posterior to the actual acetabular resection zones. The preoperative and postoperative bony impingement angles were 77.47° ± 21.31° and 12.94° ± 18.04°, respectively. The residual rate was 14.48 %. The overall mHHS significantly improved (P < 0.001) from 55.18 ± 7.96 preoperatively to 94.71 ± 4.39 postoperatively. The overall satisfaction rate was 76.66 %. The postoperative mHHSs of groups 1–3 were 95.86 ± 1.71, 95.23 ± 1.99, and 85.52 ± 6.41, respectively. Group 3 exhibited significantly lower postoperative mHHS compared to the other two groups (P = 0.001). The satisfaction rates in groups 1–3 were 92.86, 80, and 33.33 %, respectively. The satisfaction rate in group 3 was significantly worse than those of the other two groups (P = 0.017). There was a significant inverse linear relationship between the residual rate of bony impingement lesions and the postoperative mHHS (R 2 = 0.516, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The incidence of residual impingement lesions after arthroscopic pincer-type FAI correction was 63.3 %. The residual rate was 14.48 %. The residual impingement lesions were primarily in the posterior portion of the acetabulum. The clinical outcomes were associated with the residual rate of bony impingement lesions. The patients with residual rates >20 % exhibited significantly lower clinical scores and satisfaction rates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ganz R, Parvizi J, Notzli H (2003) Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:112–120PubMed Ganz R, Parvizi J, Notzli H (2003) Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:112–120PubMed
3.
go back to reference Crawford JR, Villar RN (2005) Current concepts in the management of femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1459–1462PubMedCrossRef Crawford JR, Villar RN (2005) Current concepts in the management of femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1459–1462PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Siebenrock KA, Schoniger R, Ganz R (2003) Anterior femoroacetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion and its treatment by periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg 85A:278–286 Siebenrock KA, Schoniger R, Ganz R (2003) Anterior femoroacetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion and its treatment by periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg 85A:278–286
5.
go back to reference Ito K, Minka MA 2nd, Leunig M et al (2001) Femoroactabular impingement and the cam-effect: a MRI based quantitative study of the femoral head–neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg 83B:171–176CrossRef Ito K, Minka MA 2nd, Leunig M et al (2001) Femoroactabular impingement and the cam-effect: a MRI based quantitative study of the femoral head–neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg 83B:171–176CrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference Bedi A, Chen N, Robertson W, Kelly BT (2008) The management of labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement of the hip in the young, active patient. Arthroscopy 24:1135–1145PubMedCrossRef Bedi A, Chen N, Robertson W, Kelly BT (2008) The management of labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement of the hip in the young, active patient. Arthroscopy 24:1135–1145PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Philippon MJ, Schenker ML, Briggs KK, Kuppersmith DA, Maxwell RB, Stubbs AJ (2007) Revision hip arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 35(11):1918–1921PubMedCrossRef Philippon MJ, Schenker ML, Briggs KK, Kuppersmith DA, Maxwell RB, Stubbs AJ (2007) Revision hip arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 35(11):1918–1921PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Heyworth BE, Shindle MK, Voos JE, Rudzki JR, Kelly BT (2007) Radiologic and intraoperative findings in revision hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 23(12):1295–1302PubMedCrossRef Heyworth BE, Shindle MK, Voos JE, Rudzki JR, Kelly BT (2007) Radiologic and intraoperative findings in revision hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 23(12):1295–1302PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Byrd JW, Jones KS (2011) Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 27(10):1379–1388PubMedCrossRef Byrd JW, Jones KS (2011) Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 27(10):1379–1388PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Robertson WJ, Kadrmas WR, Kelly BT (2007) Arthroscopic management of labral tears in the hip: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 455:88–92PubMedCrossRef Robertson WJ, Kadrmas WR, Kelly BT (2007) Arthroscopic management of labral tears in the hip: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 455:88–92PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nawabi DH, Nam D, Park C, Ranawat AS (2013) Hip arthroscopy: the use of computer assistance. HSSJ 9:70–78CrossRef Nawabi DH, Nam D, Park C, Ranawat AS (2013) Hip arthroscopy: the use of computer assistance. HSSJ 9:70–78CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Clohisy JC, Nepple JJ, Larson CM (2013) Persistent structural disease is the most common cause of repeat hip preservation surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3788–3794PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Clohisy JC, Nepple JJ, Larson CM (2013) Persistent structural disease is the most common cause of repeat hip preservation surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3788–3794PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Stähelin L, Stähelin T, Jolles BM (2008) Arthroscopic offset restoration in femoroacetabular cam impingement: accuracy and early clinical outcome. Arthroscopy 24(1):51–57PubMedCrossRef Stähelin L, Stähelin T, Jolles BM (2008) Arthroscopic offset restoration in femoroacetabular cam impingement: accuracy and early clinical outcome. Arthroscopy 24(1):51–57PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sussmann PS, Ranawat AS, Lipman J, Lorich DG, Padgett DE, Kelly BT (2007) Arthroscopic versus open osteoplasty of the head–neck junction: a cadaveric investigation. Arthroscopy 23:1257–1264PubMedCrossRef Sussmann PS, Ranawat AS, Lipman J, Lorich DG, Padgett DE, Kelly BT (2007) Arthroscopic versus open osteoplasty of the head–neck junction: a cadaveric investigation. Arthroscopy 23:1257–1264PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Oberlander W, Kurrat HJ, Breul R (1978) Examination of the extension of the osseous facies lunata. A functional study (author’s transl). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 116:675–682PubMed Oberlander W, Kurrat HJ, Breul R (1978) Examination of the extension of the osseous facies lunata. A functional study (author’s transl). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 116:675–682PubMed
18.
go back to reference Wolf A, Digioia AM III, Mor AB, Jaramaz B (2005) Cup alignment error model for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 437:132–137PubMedCrossRef Wolf A, Digioia AM III, Mor AB, Jaramaz B (2005) Cup alignment error model for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 437:132–137PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Zumstein M, Hahn F, Sukthankar A, Dora C (2009) How accurately can the acetabular rim be trimmed in hip arthroscopy for pincer-type femoral acetabular impingement: a cadaveric investigation. Arthroscopy 25:164–168PubMedCrossRef Zumstein M, Hahn F, Sukthankar A, Dora C (2009) How accurately can the acetabular rim be trimmed in hip arthroscopy for pincer-type femoral acetabular impingement: a cadaveric investigation. Arthroscopy 25:164–168PubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
go back to reference Trompeter A, Colegate-Stone T, Khakha R, Hull J (2013) Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: results of 118 consecutive cases in a district general hospital. Hip Int 23:400–405PubMedCrossRef Trompeter A, Colegate-Stone T, Khakha R, Hull J (2013) Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: results of 118 consecutive cases in a district general hospital. Hip Int 23:400–405PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nepple JJ, Zebala LP, Clohisy JC (2009) Labral disease associated with femoroacetabular impingement: do we need to correct the structural deformity? J Arthroplasty 24:114–119PubMedCrossRef Nepple JJ, Zebala LP, Clohisy JC (2009) Labral disease associated with femoroacetabular impingement: do we need to correct the structural deformity? J Arthroplasty 24:114–119PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Byrd JW (2003) Hip arthroscopy: the supine position. Instr Course Lect 52:721–730PubMed Byrd JW (2003) Hip arthroscopy: the supine position. Instr Course Lect 52:721–730PubMed
24.
go back to reference Sussmann PS, Zumstein M, Hahn F, Dora C (2007) The risk of vascular injury to the femoral head when using the posterolateral arthroscopy portal: cadaveric investigation. Arthroscopy 23:1112–1115PubMedCrossRef Sussmann PS, Zumstein M, Hahn F, Dora C (2007) The risk of vascular injury to the femoral head when using the posterolateral arthroscopy portal: cadaveric investigation. Arthroscopy 23:1112–1115PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lee CB, Clark J (2011) Fluoroscopic demonstration of femoroacetabular impingement during hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 27(7):994–1004PubMedCrossRef Lee CB, Clark J (2011) Fluoroscopic demonstration of femoroacetabular impingement during hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 27(7):994–1004PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Mofidi A, Shields JS, Tan JS (2011) Use of intraoperative computed tomography scanning in determining the magnitude of arthroscopic osteochondroplasty. Arthroscopy 27(7):1005–1013PubMedCrossRef Mofidi A, Shields JS, Tan JS (2011) Use of intraoperative computed tomography scanning in determining the magnitude of arthroscopic osteochondroplasty. Arthroscopy 27(7):1005–1013PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Clarke MT, Arora A, Villar RN (2003) Hip arthroscopy: complications in 1054 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 406:84–88PubMedCrossRef Clarke MT, Arora A, Villar RN (2003) Hip arthroscopy: complications in 1054 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 406:84–88PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quantitative evaluation of residual bony impingement lesions after arthroscopic treatment for isolated pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement using three-dimensional CT
Authors
Hongwu Zhuo
Xuesong Wang
Xin Liu
Guan-yang Song
Yue Li
Hua Feng
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2245-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 8/2015 Go to the issue