Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2/2013

01-02-2013 | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

Influence of anthropometric features on graft diameter in ACL reconstruction

Authors: S. Thomas, R. Bhattacharya, J. B. Saltikov, D. J. Kramer

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is a paucity of literature regarding the influence of anthropometric features on the hamstring graft obtained in ACL reconstruction. This study was undertaken to assess the influence of anthropometric measurements on the graft diameter obtained at ACL reconstruction surgery within the European population. We hypothesise that anthropometric features do influence graft thickness in ACL reconstruction.

Materials and methods

Data from 121 consecutive patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction by the same surgeon using quadruple hamstring grafts were analysed. The body mass index (BMI), height and weight of these patients were correlated with the graft diameter obtained during surgery. Regression analysis was undertaken to assess the influence of individual anthropometric variables on the graft diameter.

Results

There were 121 patients with mean age of 32 years (14–55). There was a statistically significant positive correlation individually between the height and graft diameter (r = 0.38, p < 0.01) as well as between the body weight and graft diameter (r = 0.29, p < 0.01). However, when the body mass index was calculated, the correlation was not statistically significant (r = 0.08, p > 0.1). Regression analysis confirmed that BMI was not statistically significant as a predictor of hamstring graft diameter whereas height was statistically the most important predictor (F = 20.1; p < 0.01).This yielded the predictive equation, graft diameter = 4.5 + 0.02 x Ht (in cm).

Conclusion

Although body mass index did not significantly correlate, body height may be a predictive variable in predicting the graft diameter in ACL reconstruction and provide useful pre operative information.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Johnson DL, Warner JJ (1993) Diagnosis for anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Clin Sports Med 12:671–684PubMed Johnson DL, Warner JJ (1993) Diagnosis for anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Clin Sports Med 12:671–684PubMed
2.
go back to reference Strickland SM, MacGillivray JD, Warren RF (2003) Anterior cruciate reconstruction with allograft tendons. Orthop Clin North Am 34(1):41–47PubMedCrossRef Strickland SM, MacGillivray JD, Warren RF (2003) Anterior cruciate reconstruction with allograft tendons. Orthop Clin North Am 34(1):41–47PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Carey JL, Dunn WR, Dahm DL et al (2009) A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(9):2242–2250PubMedCrossRef Carey JL, Dunn WR, Dahm DL et al (2009) A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(9):2242–2250PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Krych AJ, Jackson JD, Hoskin TL et al (2008) A meta-analysis of patella tendon autograft versus patella tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24(3):292–298PubMedCrossRef Krych AJ, Jackson JD, Hoskin TL et al (2008) A meta-analysis of patella tendon autograft versus patella tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24(3):292–298PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Samuelsson K, Andersson D, Karlsson J (2009) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries with special reference to graft type and surgical technique: an assessment of randomised control trials. Arthroscopy 25(10):1139–1174PubMedCrossRef Samuelsson K, Andersson D, Karlsson J (2009) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries with special reference to graft type and surgical technique: an assessment of randomised control trials. Arthroscopy 25(10):1139–1174PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tuman JM, Diduch RD, Rubino JL et al (2007) Predictors for hamstring graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35(11):1945–1949PubMedCrossRef Tuman JM, Diduch RD, Rubino JL et al (2007) Predictors for hamstring graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35(11):1945–1949PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schwartzberg R, Burkhart B, Lariviere C et al (2008) Prediction of hamstring tendon autograft diameter and length for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Orthop 37(3):157–159PubMed Schwartzberg R, Burkhart B, Lariviere C et al (2008) Prediction of hamstring tendon autograft diameter and length for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Orthop 37(3):157–159PubMed
8.
go back to reference Treme G, Diduch DR, Billante MJ et al (2008) Hamstring graft size prediction– a prospective clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 36(11):2204–2209PubMedCrossRef Treme G, Diduch DR, Billante MJ et al (2008) Hamstring graft size prediction– a prospective clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 36(11):2204–2209PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ma BC, Keifa E, Dunn W et al (2010) Can pre-operative measures predict quadruple hamstring graft diameter? Knee 17:81–83PubMedCrossRef Ma BC, Keifa E, Dunn W et al (2010) Can pre-operative measures predict quadruple hamstring graft diameter? Knee 17:81–83PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chaudhri AM, Zelman EA, Flanigan DC et al (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament –injured subjects have smaller anterior cruciate ligaments than matched controls: a magnetic resonance imaging study. American J Sports Med 37(7):1282–1287CrossRef Chaudhri AM, Zelman EA, Flanigan DC et al (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament –injured subjects have smaller anterior cruciate ligaments than matched controls: a magnetic resonance imaging study. American J Sports Med 37(7):1282–1287CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Teli M, Chiodini F, Sottocasa R et al (2005) Influence of the diameters of tendon graft and bone tunnel in hamstring ACL reconstruction. A bovine model. Chir Organi Mov 90(3):281–285 Teli M, Chiodini F, Sottocasa R et al (2005) Influence of the diameters of tendon graft and bone tunnel in hamstring ACL reconstruction. A bovine model. Chir Organi Mov 90(3):281–285
12.
go back to reference Dienst M, Schneider G, Altmeyer K et al (2007) Correlation of intercondylar notch cross sections to ACL size: a high resolution MR tomographic in vivo analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124(4):253–260CrossRef Dienst M, Schneider G, Altmeyer K et al (2007) Correlation of intercondylar notch cross sections to ACL size: a high resolution MR tomographic in vivo analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124(4):253–260CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Anderson AF, Dome DC, Gautam S et al (2001) Correlation of anthropometric measurements, strength, anterior cruciate ligament size and intercondylar notch characteristics to sex differences in anterior cruciate liagemnt tear rates. Am J Sports Med 29(1):58–66PubMed Anderson AF, Dome DC, Gautam S et al (2001) Correlation of anthropometric measurements, strength, anterior cruciate ligament size and intercondylar notch characteristics to sex differences in anterior cruciate liagemnt tear rates. Am J Sports Med 29(1):58–66PubMed
14.
go back to reference Odensten M, Gillquist J (1985) Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and a rationale for reconstruction. J Bone and Joint Surg Am 67:257–262 Odensten M, Gillquist J (1985) Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and a rationale for reconstruction. J Bone and Joint Surg Am 67:257–262
15.
go back to reference Miller MD [2008]. Review of orthopaedics. 5th edn. Saunders, Elsevier. P-257 Miller MD [2008]. Review of orthopaedics. 5th edn. Saunders, Elsevier. P-257
16.
go back to reference Charlton WP, St John TA, Ciccotti MG, Harrison N, Schweitzer M (2002) Differences in femoral notch anatomy between men and women: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med 2002(30):329–333 Charlton WP, St John TA, Ciccotti MG, Harrison N, Schweitzer M (2002) Differences in femoral notch anatomy between men and women: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med 2002(30):329–333
17.
go back to reference Muneta T, Takakuda K, Yamamoto H (1997) Intercondylar notch width and its relation to the configuration and cross-sectional area of the anterior cruciate ligament: a cadaveric knee study. Am J Sports Med 25:69–72PubMedCrossRef Muneta T, Takakuda K, Yamamoto H (1997) Intercondylar notch width and its relation to the configuration and cross-sectional area of the anterior cruciate ligament: a cadaveric knee study. Am J Sports Med 25:69–72PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Handl M, Drzik M, Cerulli G et al (2007) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: dynamic strain evaluation of the graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(3):534–539CrossRef Handl M, Drzik M, Cerulli G et al (2007) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: dynamic strain evaluation of the graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(3):534–539CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hamner DL, Brown CH, Stiener ME et al (1999) Hamstring tendon graft for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomechanical evaluation of the multiple strands and tensioning techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(4):549–557PubMed Hamner DL, Brown CH, Stiener ME et al (1999) Hamstring tendon graft for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomechanical evaluation of the multiple strands and tensioning techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(4):549–557PubMed
Metadata
Title
Influence of anthropometric features on graft diameter in ACL reconstruction
Authors
S. Thomas
R. Bhattacharya
J. B. Saltikov
D. J. Kramer
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1648-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2/2013 Go to the issue