Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 1/2012

01-01-2012 | Orthopaedic Outcome Assessment

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the Oxford shoulder score

Authors: Young Hak Roh, Jung Ho Noh, Woo Kim, Joo Han Oh, Hyun Sik Gong, Goo Hyun Baek

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Oxford shoulder score (OSS) is being used increasingly and has been adapted cross-culturally in some Western countries. On the other hand, there are few validated translations of the OSS in Asian countries. This study translated and adapted cross-culturally the original OSS to produce a Korean version, and assessed the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the OSS (Korean OSS).

Methods

One hundred and five patients with shoulder pain caused by degenerative or inflammatory disorders completed the Korean OSS and Korean disability of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH). In addition, the pain score by a visual analog scale (VAS) during activity and at rest, subjective assessment of activities of daily living (ADL), the active range of motion (ROM), and measurements of the abduction strength (strength) were included in the validation process.

Results

There were no major linguistic or cultural problems during the forward and backward translations of the MHQ, except for a minor change due to cultural discrepancies in eating such as using a spoon and chopsticks by one dominant hand instead of a knife and fork by two hands. The internal consistency was high (Cronbach’s alpha 0.91). The reproducibility test showed no significant difference (Intra-class coefficient 0.95). The construct validity, which was tested by the Pearson correlation coefficient revealed a strong correlation (r > 0.6) between the Korean OSS against subscale of DASH disability/symptom, DASH work and ADL, as well as a moderate correlation (0.3 < r < 0.6) with the DASH sports/music, strength, ROM, pain during activity and pain at rest.

Conclusion

The Korean OSS proved to be valid by demonstrating a significant correlation with the patient-based upper extremity questionnaire and clinical assessment. The application and evaluation of the instrument is feasible and understandable among patients in Korea.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chard MD, Hazleman R, Hazleman BL, King RH, Reiss BB (1991) Shoulder disorders in the elderly: a community survey. Arthritis Rheum 34(6):766–769PubMedCrossRef Chard MD, Hazleman R, Hazleman BL, King RH, Reiss BB (1991) Shoulder disorders in the elderly: a community survey. Arthritis Rheum 34(6):766–769PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(4):593–600PubMed Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(4):593–600PubMed
3.
go back to reference Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164PubMed Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164PubMed
4.
go back to reference King GJ, Richards RR, Zuckerman JD, Blasier R, Dillman C, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Iannotti JP, Murnahan JP, Mow VC, Woo SL (1999) A standardized method for assessment of elbow function Research Committee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8(4):351–354PubMedCrossRef King GJ, Richards RR, Zuckerman JD, Blasier R, Dillman C, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Iannotti JP, Murnahan JP, Mow VC, Woo SL (1999) A standardized method for assessment of elbow function Research Committee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8(4):351–354PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29(6):602–608PubMedCrossRef Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29(6):602–608PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Harvie P, Pollard TC, Chennagiri RJ, Carr AJ (2005) The use of outcome scores in surgery of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(2):151–154PubMedCrossRef Harvie P, Pollard TC, Chennagiri RJ, Carr AJ (2005) The use of outcome scores in surgery of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(2):151–154PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K (2003) Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 19(10):1109–1120PubMedCrossRef Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K (2003) Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 19(10):1109–1120PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Christie A, Hagen KB, Mowinckel P, Dagfinrud H (2009) Methodological properties of six shoulder disability measures in patients with rheumatic diseases referred for shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(1):89–95PubMedCrossRef Christie A, Hagen KB, Mowinckel P, Dagfinrud H (2009) Methodological properties of six shoulder disability measures in patients with rheumatic diseases referred for shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(1):89–95PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Huber W, Hofstaetter JG, Hanslik-Schnabel B, Posch M, Wurnig C (2004) The German version of the Oxford Shoulder Score cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124(8):531–536PubMedCrossRef Huber W, Hofstaetter JG, Hanslik-Schnabel B, Posch M, Wurnig C (2004) The German version of the Oxford Shoulder Score cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124(8):531–536PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Berendes T, Pilot P, Willems J, Verburg H, te Slaa R (2010) Validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford Shoulder Score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(6):829–836PubMedCrossRef Berendes T, Pilot P, Willems J, Verburg H, te Slaa R (2010) Validation of the Dutch version of the Oxford Shoulder Score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(6):829–836PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Murena L, Vulcano E, D’Angelo F, Monti M, Cherubino P (2010) Italian cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Oxford shoulder score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(3):335–341PubMedCrossRef Murena L, Vulcano E, D’Angelo F, Monti M, Cherubino P (2010) Italian cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Oxford shoulder score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(3):335–341PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tugay U, Tugay N, Gelecek N, Ozkan M (2011) Oxford Shoulder Score: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(5):687–694PubMedCrossRef Tugay U, Tugay N, Gelecek N, Ozkan M (2011) Oxford Shoulder Score: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(5):687–694PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25(24):3186–3191PubMedCrossRef Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25(24):3186–3191PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46(12):1417–1432PubMedCrossRef Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46(12):1417–1432PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lee JY, Lim JY, Oh JH, Ko YM (2008) Cross-cultural adaptation and clinical evaluation of a Korean version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand outcome questionnaire (K-DASH). J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(4):570–574PubMedCrossRef Lee JY, Lim JY, Oh JH, Ko YM (2008) Cross-cultural adaptation and clinical evaluation of a Korean version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand outcome questionnaire (K-DASH). J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(4):570–574PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Portney LG, Watkins MP (2000) Foundations of clinical research: application to practice, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, NJ, USA Portney LG, Watkins MP (2000) Foundations of clinical research: application to practice, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, NJ, USA
17.
go back to reference Green SB, Yang Y (2009) Commentary on coefficient alpha: a cautionary tale. Psychometrika 74(1):121–135CrossRef Green SB, Yang Y (2009) Commentary on coefficient alpha: a cautionary tale. Psychometrika 74(1):121–135CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ, Shavelson RJ (2004) My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educ Psychol Measur 64(3):391CrossRef Cronbach LJ, Shavelson RJ (2004) My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educ Psychol Measur 64(3):391CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kirshner B, Guyatt G (1985) A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 38(1):27–36PubMedCrossRef Kirshner B, Guyatt G (1985) A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 38(1):27–36PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Trochin VM, Donnelly JP (2007) The research methods knowledge base, 3rd edn. Thomson, OH, USA Trochin VM, Donnelly JP (2007) The research methods knowledge base, 3rd edn. Thomson, OH, USA
21.
go back to reference Kane RL (1997) Understanding health care outcomes research, 2nd edn. Gaithersburg, MD, USA Kane RL (1997) Understanding health care outcomes research, 2nd edn. Gaithersburg, MD, USA
22.
go back to reference Dawson J, Rogers K, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A (2009) The Oxford shoulder score revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(1):119–123PubMedCrossRef Dawson J, Rogers K, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A (2009) The Oxford shoulder score revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(1):119–123PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Park M, Chesla C (2007) Revisiting Confucianism as a conceptual framework for Asian family study. J Fam Nurs 13(3):293–311PubMedCrossRef Park M, Chesla C (2007) Revisiting Confucianism as a conceptual framework for Asian family study. J Fam Nurs 13(3):293–311PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tsai YF (2007) Gender differences in pain and depressive tendency among Chinese elders with knee osteoarthritis. Pain 130(1–2):188–194PubMedCrossRef Tsai YF (2007) Gender differences in pain and depressive tendency among Chinese elders with knee osteoarthritis. Pain 130(1–2):188–194PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hendrickson AR, Massey PD, Cronan TP (1993) On the test–retest reliability of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use scales. MIS Quarterly:227–230 Hendrickson AR, Massey PD, Cronan TP (1993) On the test–retest reliability of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use scales. MIS Quarterly:227–230
Metadata
Title
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the Oxford shoulder score
Authors
Young Hak Roh
Jung Ho Noh
Woo Kim
Joo Han Oh
Hyun Sik Gong
Goo Hyun Baek
Publication date
01-01-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1393-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 1/2012 Go to the issue