Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2/2011

01-02-2011 | Orthopaedic Surgery

Mechanical characterization of nacre as an ideal-model for innovative new endoprosthesis materials

Authors: Berna Ida Richter, Sarah Kellner, Henning Menzel, Peter Behrens, Berend Denkena, Sven Ostermeier, Christof Hurschler

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

To mimic the impressive mechanical behavior of natural ceramics for technical or biomedical applications, interest has been focused on nacre, a natural composite consisting of imbricated aragonite platelets embedded in a protein matrix. Nacre is an ideal model material for implants, since it possesses favorable strength and toughness properties compared to the component materials of which it is composed. The focus of the present study was to test standardized parameters which are good indicators of the material’s suitability as an implant material.

Materials and methods

A three-point bending test was performed on polished nacre samples according to international standards for Young’s modulus, bending strength and fracture toughness. A total of 60 nacre samples were tested, with 5 samples each in 4 states of hydration (dry, distilled water, 0.9% NaCl and sea water). As a basis for comparison, 10 samples of a newly developed bioceramic material were tested for fracture toughness.

Results

The fracture toughness of nacre tended to be higher for specimens conditioned in 0.9% NaCl than for dry specimens (5.3 ± 0.6 vs. 4.3 ± 0.7 MPam1/2, p = 0.061). The fracture toughness of the bioceramic investigated was observed to be somewhat higher than nacre (5.8 ± 0.4 vs. 4.3 ± 0.7 MPam1/2, p ≤ 0.001).

Discussion and conclusion

The increase in fracture toughness of hydrated nacre was not as large as would be expected based on the difference in stiffness of the matrix material after hydration that has been reported. Modulus and toughness were similar to published values and the fracture toughness observed was somewhat higher than reported for alumina implant ceramics, which are in use in total hip arthroplasty. In a direct comparison, we found that a newly developed alumina bioceramic material can in fact match nature in terms of fracture toughness.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mayer G (2005) Rigid biological systems as models for synthetic composites. Science 310:1144–1147CrossRefPubMed Mayer G (2005) Rigid biological systems as models for synthetic composites. Science 310:1144–1147CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Currey JD (1977) Mechanical properties of mother of pearl in tension. Proc R Soc Lond B 196:443–463CrossRef Currey JD (1977) Mechanical properties of mother of pearl in tension. Proc R Soc Lond B 196:443–463CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Barthelat F (2007) Biomimetics for next generation materials. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 365:2907–2919CrossRefPubMed Barthelat F (2007) Biomimetics for next generation materials. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 365:2907–2919CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gao H, Ji B, Jager IL, Arzt E, Fratzl P (2003) Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: lessons from nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:5597–5600CrossRefPubMed Gao H, Ji B, Jager IL, Arzt E, Fratzl P (2003) Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: lessons from nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:5597–5600CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Jackson AP, Vincent JFV, Turner RM (1988) The mechanical design of nacre. Proc R Soc Lond B 234:415–440CrossRef Jackson AP, Vincent JFV, Turner RM (1988) The mechanical design of nacre. Proc R Soc Lond B 234:415–440CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Currey JD, Zioupos P, Davies P, Casino A (2001) Mechanical properties of nacre and highly mineralized bone. Proc Biol Sci 268:107–111CrossRefPubMed Currey JD, Zioupos P, Davies P, Casino A (2001) Mechanical properties of nacre and highly mineralized bone. Proc Biol Sci 268:107–111CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Jackson AP, Vincent JFV, Turner RM (1990) Comparison of nacre with other ceramic composites. J Mater Sci 25:3173–3180CrossRef Jackson AP, Vincent JFV, Turner RM (1990) Comparison of nacre with other ceramic composites. J Mater Sci 25:3173–3180CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fischer H, Waindich A, Telle R (2008) Influence of preparation of ceramic SEVNB specimens on fracture toughness testing results. Dent Mater 24:618–622CrossRefPubMed Fischer H, Waindich A, Telle R (2008) Influence of preparation of ceramic SEVNB specimens on fracture toughness testing results. Dent Mater 24:618–622CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Scherrer SS, Denry IL, Wiskott HW (1998) Comparison of three fracture toughness testing techniques using a dental glass and a dental ceramic. Dent Mater 14:246–255CrossRefPubMed Scherrer SS, Denry IL, Wiskott HW (1998) Comparison of three fracture toughness testing techniques using a dental glass and a dental ceramic. Dent Mater 14:246–255CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference European Committee for Standardization (2006) EN 843-2: Advanced technical ceramics—mechanical properties of monolithic ceramics at room temperature—Part 2: Determination of Young’s modulus, shear modulus and Poisson’s ratio; German version EN 843-2 European Committee for Standardization (2006) EN 843-2: Advanced technical ceramics—mechanical properties of monolithic ceramics at room temperature—Part 2: Determination of Young’s modulus, shear modulus and Poisson’s ratio; German version EN 843-2
11.
go back to reference European Committee for Standardization (2006) EN 843-1: Advanced technical ceramics—mechanical properties of monolithic ceramics at room temperature—Part 1: Determination of flexural strength; German version EN 843-1 European Committee for Standardization (2006) EN 843-1: Advanced technical ceramics—mechanical properties of monolithic ceramics at room temperature—Part 1: Determination of flexural strength; German version EN 843-1
12.
go back to reference International Organization for Standardization (2008) ISO 23146: Fine ceramics (advanced ceramics, advanced technical ceramics)—test methods for fracture toughness of monolithic ceramics—single-edge V-notch beam (SEVNB) method, ISO 23146 International Organization for Standardization (2008) ISO 23146: Fine ceramics (advanced ceramics, advanced technical ceramics)—test methods for fracture toughness of monolithic ceramics—single-edge V-notch beam (SEVNB) method, ISO 23146
13.
go back to reference German Committee for Standardization (DIN) (2004) DIN CEN/TS 14425-5: Advanced technical ceramics—test methods for determination of fracture toughness of monolitic ceramics—Part 5: Single-edge vee-notch beam (SEVNB) method; German version CEN/TS 14425-5 German Committee for Standardization (DIN) (2004) DIN CEN/TS 14425-5: Advanced technical ceramics—test methods for determination of fracture toughness of monolitic ceramics—Part 5: Single-edge vee-notch beam (SEVNB) method; German version CEN/TS 14425-5
14.
go back to reference CeramTec AG, Medical Products Division, Plochingen, Germany: BIOLOX® delta—nanocomposite for arthroplasty. Scientific Information and Performance Data, p 11 CeramTec AG, Medical Products Division, Plochingen, Germany: BIOLOX® delta—nanocomposite for arthroplasty. Scientific Information and Performance Data, p 11
15.
go back to reference Munch E, Launey ME, Alsem DH, Saiz E, Tomsia AP, Ritchie RO (2008) Tough, bio-inspired hybrid materials. Science 322:1516–1520CrossRefPubMed Munch E, Launey ME, Alsem DH, Saiz E, Tomsia AP, Ritchie RO (2008) Tough, bio-inspired hybrid materials. Science 322:1516–1520CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Mechanical characterization of nacre as an ideal-model for innovative new endoprosthesis materials
Authors
Berna Ida Richter
Sarah Kellner
Henning Menzel
Peter Behrens
Berend Denkena
Sven Ostermeier
Christof Hurschler
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1118-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2/2011 Go to the issue