Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 3/2010

01-03-2010 | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

Chondrocyte function after osteochondral transfer: comparison of concave and plane punches

Authors: Johannes Dominik Bastian, Rainer Josef Egli, Wilhelm Hofstetter, Michael Leunig

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

An incongruity between instrument and articular surfaces in osteochondral transfer (OCT) results in unevenly distributed impact forces exerted on the cartilage which may cause a loss of functional chondrocytes. We tested whether a plane instead of a concave design of the punch of an osteotome can reduce these cartilage damages.

Methods

Osteochondral cylinders were transferred from a donor to a recipient site within porcine humeral heads. Histological sections of the cartilage were assessed for metabolic active chondrocytes by in situ hybridization detecting coll α1(II) mRNA subsequent to OCT and 24 h thereafter.

Results

The percentage of cartilage harbouring functional chondrocytes in the transferred grafts was 85 ± 10 and 91 ± 4% subsequently to OCT using punches with concave or plane surfaces, respectively, and 83 ± 10% (concave) and 82 ± 10% (plane) after 24 h. In the superficial layer of the cartilage the percentages were 72 ± 13% (concave) and 84 ± 8% (plane) subsequently to OCT, and 68 ± 15% (concave) and 70 ± 3% (plane) after 24 h. The analysis did not reveal any statistically significant differences.

Conclusions

The OCT leads to considerable loss of functional chondrocytes which could not be prevented by the use of a plane instead of a concave punch. Since functional chondrocytes might be of crucial importance for the survival and integration of the graft into the recipient site further work is needed to optimize the OCT procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gudas R, Stankevicius E, Monastyreckiene E et al (2006) Osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee joint in athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:834–842. doi:10.1007/s00167-006-0067-0 CrossRefPubMed Gudas R, Stankevicius E, Monastyreckiene E et al (2006) Osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee joint in athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:834–842. doi:10.​1007/​s00167-006-0067-0 CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hangody L, Kish G, Karpati Z et al (1997) Arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of femoral condylar articular defects. A preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:262–267. doi:10.1007/s001670050061 CrossRefPubMed Hangody L, Kish G, Karpati Z et al (1997) Arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of femoral condylar articular defects. A preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:262–267. doi:10.​1007/​s001670050061 CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bartz RL, Kamaric E, Noble PC et al (2001) Topographic matching of selected donor and recipient sites for osteochondral autografting of the articular surface of the femoral condyles. Am J Sports Med 29:207–212PubMed Bartz RL, Kamaric E, Noble PC et al (2001) Topographic matching of selected donor and recipient sites for osteochondral autografting of the articular surface of the femoral condyles. Am J Sports Med 29:207–212PubMed
7.
go back to reference Bastian JD, Egli RJ, Ganz R et al (2009) Differential response of porcine osteoblasts and chondrocytes in cell or tissue culture after 5-aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy. Osteoarthr Cartil 17(4):539–546CrossRefPubMed Bastian JD, Egli RJ, Ganz R et al (2009) Differential response of porcine osteoblasts and chondrocytes in cell or tissue culture after 5-aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy. Osteoarthr Cartil 17(4):539–546CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Nabavi-Tabrizi A, Turnbull A, Dao Q et al (2002) Chondrocyte damage following osteochondral grafting using metal and plastic punches: comparative study in an animal model. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 10:170–172 Nabavi-Tabrizi A, Turnbull A, Dao Q et al (2002) Chondrocyte damage following osteochondral grafting using metal and plastic punches: comparative study in an animal model. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 10:170–172
11.
go back to reference Bobic V (1996) Arthroscopic osteochondral autograft transplantation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3:262–264. doi:10.1007/BF01466630 CrossRefPubMed Bobic V (1996) Arthroscopic osteochondral autograft transplantation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3:262–264. doi:10.​1007/​BF01466630 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lane JG, Tontz WL Jr, Ball ST et al (2001) A morphologic, biochemical, and biomechanical assessment of short-term effects of osteochondral autograft plug transfer in an animal model. Arthroscopy 17:856–863PubMed Lane JG, Tontz WL Jr, Ball ST et al (2001) A morphologic, biochemical, and biomechanical assessment of short-term effects of osteochondral autograft plug transfer in an animal model. Arthroscopy 17:856–863PubMed
14.
go back to reference Horas U, Pelinkovic D, Herr G et al (2003) Autologous chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral cylinder transplantation in cartilage repair of the knee joint. A prospective, comparative trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:185–192PubMed Horas U, Pelinkovic D, Herr G et al (2003) Autologous chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral cylinder transplantation in cartilage repair of the knee joint. A prospective, comparative trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:185–192PubMed
16.
go back to reference Khan IM, Gilbert SJ, Singhrao SK et al (2008) Cartilage integration: evaluation of the reasons for failure of integration during cartilage repair. A review. Eur Cell Mater 16:26–39PubMed Khan IM, Gilbert SJ, Singhrao SK et al (2008) Cartilage integration: evaluation of the reasons for failure of integration during cartilage repair. A review. Eur Cell Mater 16:26–39PubMed
17.
go back to reference Gilbert SJ, Singhrao SK, Khan IM et al (2009) Enhanced tissue integration during cartilage repair in vitro can be achieved by inhibiting chondrocyte death at the wound edge. Tissue Eng Part A Gilbert SJ, Singhrao SK, Khan IM et al (2009) Enhanced tissue integration during cartilage repair in vitro can be achieved by inhibiting chondrocyte death at the wound edge. Tissue Eng Part A
18.
go back to reference Ahmad CS, Cohen ZA, Levine WN et al (2001) Biomechanical and topographic considerations for autologous osteochondral grafting in the knee. Am J Sports Med 29:201–206PubMed Ahmad CS, Cohen ZA, Levine WN et al (2001) Biomechanical and topographic considerations for autologous osteochondral grafting in the knee. Am J Sports Med 29:201–206PubMed
20.
go back to reference Bobic V (1999) Autologous osteo-chondral grafts in the management of articular cartilage lesions. Orthopade 28:19–25PubMed Bobic V (1999) Autologous osteo-chondral grafts in the management of articular cartilage lesions. Orthopade 28:19–25PubMed
22.
23.
25.
go back to reference Torzilli PA, Grigiene R, Borrelli J Jr et al (1999) Effect of impact load on articular cartilage: cell metabolism and viability, and matrix water content. J Biomech Eng 121:433–441. doi:10.1115/1.2835070 CrossRefPubMed Torzilli PA, Grigiene R, Borrelli J Jr et al (1999) Effect of impact load on articular cartilage: cell metabolism and viability, and matrix water content. J Biomech Eng 121:433–441. doi:10.​1115/​1.​2835070 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Chondrocyte function after osteochondral transfer: comparison of concave and plane punches
Authors
Johannes Dominik Bastian
Rainer Josef Egli
Wilhelm Hofstetter
Michael Leunig
Publication date
01-03-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0867-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 3/2010 Go to the issue