Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 5/2009

01-05-2009 | Orthopaedic Outcome Assessment

Evaluation of responsiveness of Oswestry low back pain disability index

Authors: Manish Changulani, Anthony Shaju

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 5/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim

To assess the response of Oswestry disability index (ODI) among patients undergoing caudal epidural steroid injections for lumbosacral radicular pain.

Methods

A total number of 107 consecutive patients were analysed. ODI was obtained at preassessment and then at 6 weeks post-injection. At follow-up, patients were asked to rate their condition on an ordinal scale as compared to pre-injection based on their response to five questions (much better, better, same, worse, much worse). As a measure of responsiveness, the effect size and standardized response mean (SRM) was calculated.

Results

The mean age of the cohort was 58 years. The mean duration of symptoms was 11 months. The mean Pre-injection ODI for 107 patients was 49(95% CI 46–52). The mean post-injection ODI at 6 weeks was 32(95% CI 28–35). The mean change in ODI was 16.9(95% CI 14–19). The mean change in ODI for much better or much worse group was 21.98(95% CI 18–25). The mean change in ODI for better or worse group was 15(95% CI 10–19) (P = 0.01). The mean change in ODI for same group was −0.6(95% CI −10 to 11). The effect size for the whole group was 1.05. The responsiveness as measured by SRM for the whole group was 0.84.

Conclusion

This study shows that ODI can detect small changes in disability over time in patients undergoing caudal epidural injections for lumbosacral radicular pain. It can also differentiate between small and large changes in the level of disability.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baker D, Pynsent P, Fairbank J (1989) The Oswestry disability index revisited. In: Roland M, Jenner J (eds) Back pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. Manchester University press, Manchester, pp 174–186 Baker D, Pynsent P, Fairbank J (1989) The Oswestry disability index revisited. In: Roland M, Jenner J (eds) Back pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. Manchester University press, Manchester, pp 174–186
2.
go back to reference Fairbank J, Cooper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273PubMed Fairbank J, Cooper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273PubMed
3.
go back to reference Fisher K, Johnson M (1997) Validation of the Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire, its sensitivity as a measure of change following treatment and its relationship with other aspects of chronic pain experience. Physiother Theory Pract 13:67–80CrossRef Fisher K, Johnson M (1997) Validation of the Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire, its sensitivity as a measure of change following treatment and its relationship with other aspects of chronic pain experience. Physiother Theory Pract 13:67–80CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chow JH, Chan CC (2005) Validation of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index. Work 25:307–314PubMed Chow JH, Chan CC (2005) Validation of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index. Work 25:307–314PubMed
5.
go back to reference Exner V, Keel P (2000) Measuring disability of patients with low-back pain—validation of a German version of the Roland & Morris disability questionnaire. Schmerz 14:392–400 (in German)PubMedCrossRef Exner V, Keel P (2000) Measuring disability of patients with low-back pain—validation of a German version of the Roland & Morris disability questionnaire. Schmerz 14:392–400 (in German)PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C (2003) The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire:longitudinal construct validity and measuring self rated health after surgery. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord 4:1471–1474 Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C (2003) The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire:longitudinal construct validity and measuring self rated health after surgery. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord 4:1471–1474
8.
go back to reference Gronblad M, Hupli M, Wennerstrand P, Jarvinen E, Lukinmaa A, Kouri JP et al (1993) Intercorrelation and test retest reliability of the pain disability index (PDI) and Oswestry disability questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlationwith pain intensity in low back pain patients. Clin J Pain 9:189–195PubMedCrossRef Gronblad M, Hupli M, Wennerstrand P, Jarvinen E, Lukinmaa A, Kouri JP et al (1993) Intercorrelation and test retest reliability of the pain disability index (PDI) and Oswestry disability questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlationwith pain intensity in low back pain patients. Clin J Pain 9:189–195PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD (2000) Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 53:459–468PubMedCrossRef Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD (2000) Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 53:459–468PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of responsiveness of Oswestry low back pain disability index
Authors
Manish Changulani
Anthony Shaju
Publication date
01-05-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 5/2009
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0653-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2009

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 5/2009 Go to the issue