Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 8/2008

01-08-2008 | Orthopaedic Surgery

Range of motion during the perioperative period in total knee arthroplasty

Authors: Yoshinori Ishii, Hideo Noguchi, Yoshikazu Matsuda, Mitsuhiro Takeda, Hiroshi Kiga, Shin-ichi Toyabe

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 8/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

This study focused on the change in the range of motion (ROM) during the perioperative period, i.e., the preoperative and intraoperative ROM, and that on discharge, and compared the difference between posterior cruciate ligament-retaining (PCLR) and -sacrificing (PCLS) prostheses.

Materials and methods

In this prospectively randomized study, we compared the changes in the ROM in PCLR (n = 50) and PCLS (n = 50) total knee arthroplasties.

Results

The mean flexion in PCLR prostheses was 130.0° preoperatively, 120.0° intraoperatively, and 105.0° at discharge, and 125.0°, 120.0°, and 100.0°, respectively, in PCLS. The designs did not differ statistically in each period (P > 0.05). Both designs showed significant correlations between the preoperative and intraoperative ROM, and between the preoperative and discharge ROM. Only the PCLS showed a significant correlation between the intraoperative and discharge ROM, and a significant difference was observed in correlation of rank coefficient between the two prostheses (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The PCLS design has an advantage in rehabilitation planning because of the predictable changes in the ROM during the perioperative period, although the acquired average ROM at discharge did not differ statistically.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Arima J, Whiteside LA, Martin JW et al (1998) Effect of partial release of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 353:194–202PubMedCrossRef Arima J, Whiteside LA, Martin JW et al (1998) Effect of partial release of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 353:194–202PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A (2002) Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty: influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:50–53PubMedCrossRef Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A (2002) Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty: influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:50–53PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Brosseau L, Milne S, Wells G et al (2004) Efficacy of continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty: metaanalysis. J Rheumatol 31:2251–2264PubMed Brosseau L, Milne S, Wells G et al (2004) Efficacy of continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty: metaanalysis. J Rheumatol 31:2251–2264PubMed
4.
go back to reference Buechel FF Sr (2002) Long-term follow-up after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:40–50PubMedCrossRef Buechel FF Sr (2002) Long-term follow-up after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:40–50PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Stiehl JB, Walker SA, Dennis KN (1998) Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty 13:748–752PubMedCrossRef Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Stiehl JB, Walker SA, Dennis KN (1998) Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty 13:748–752PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Figgie HE, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS, Gordon NH (1986) The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:1035–1040PubMed Figgie HE, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS, Gordon NH (1986) The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:1035–1040PubMed
7.
go back to reference Gatha NM, Clarke HD, Fuchs R, Scruderi GR, Insall JN (2004) Factors affecting postoperative range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 17:196–202PubMed Gatha NM, Clarke HD, Fuchs R, Scruderi GR, Insall JN (2004) Factors affecting postoperative range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 17:196–202PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hagena FW, Hofmann GO, Mittelmeier T, Wasmer G, Bergmann M (1989) The cruciate ligament in knee replacement. Int Orthop 13:13–16PubMedCrossRef Hagena FW, Hofmann GO, Mittelmeier T, Wasmer G, Bergmann M (1989) The cruciate ligament in knee replacement. Int Orthop 13:13–16PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Insall JN, Easley ME (2001) Surgical techniques and instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall JN, Scott WN (eds) Surgery of the knee, vol 2. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 1553–1620 Insall JN, Easley ME (2001) Surgical techniques and instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall JN, Scott WN (eds) Surgery of the knee, vol 2. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 1553–1620
10.
go back to reference Ishii Y, Matsuda Y, Sakata S et al (2005) Primary total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis I total knee prosthesis: a 5- to 10-year follow-up study. Knee 12:341–345PubMedCrossRef Ishii Y, Matsuda Y, Sakata S et al (2005) Primary total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis I total knee prosthesis: a 5- to 10-year follow-up study. Knee 12:341–345PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kawamura H, Bourne RB (2001) Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 6:248–252PubMedCrossRef Kawamura H, Bourne RB (2001) Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 6:248–252PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kim YH, Sohn KS, Kim JS (2005) Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1470–1475PubMedCrossRef Kim YH, Sohn KS, Kim JS (2005) Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1470–1475PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kotani A, Yonekura A, Bourne RB (2005) Factors influencing range of motion after contemporary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20:850–856PubMedCrossRef Kotani A, Yonekura A, Bourne RB (2005) Factors influencing range of motion after contemporary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20:850–856PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kumar PJ, McPherson EJ, Dorr LD, Wan Z, Baldwin K (1996) Rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of two rehabilitation techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:93–101PubMedCrossRef Kumar PJ, McPherson EJ, Dorr LD, Wan Z, Baldwin K (1996) Rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of two rehabilitation techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:93–101PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH et al (2000) Prospective randomized clinical trial of continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:30–35PubMedCrossRef MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH et al (2000) Prospective randomized clinical trial of continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:30–35PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Maloney WJ, Schurman DJ (1992) The effect of implant design on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Total condylar versus posterior stabilized total condylar designs. Clin Orthop 278:147–152PubMed Maloney WJ, Schurman DJ (1992) The effect of implant design on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Total condylar versus posterior stabilized total condylar designs. Clin Orthop 278:147–152PubMed
17.
go back to reference Matsuda Y, Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Ishii R, Kiga H (2005) Varus-valgus balance affects the range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:804–808PubMedCrossRef Matsuda Y, Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Ishii R, Kiga H (2005) Varus-valgus balance affects the range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:804–808PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mauerhan DR, Mokris JG, Ly A, Kiebzak GM (1998) Relationship between length of stay and manipulation rate after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13:896–900PubMedCrossRef Mauerhan DR, Mokris JG, Ly A, Kiebzak GM (1998) Relationship between length of stay and manipulation rate after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13:896–900PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pope RO, Corcoran S, McCaul K, Howie DW (1997) Continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty. Does it offer any benefits? J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:914–917PubMedCrossRef Pope RO, Corcoran S, McCaul K, Howie DW (1997) Continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty. Does it offer any benefits? J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:914–917PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ranawat CS, Ranawat AS, Mehta A (2003) Total knee arthroplasty rehabilitation protocol. What makes the difference? J Arthroplasty 18(Suppl 1):27–30PubMedCrossRef Ranawat CS, Ranawat AS, Mehta A (2003) Total knee arthroplasty rehabilitation protocol. What makes the difference? J Arthroplasty 18(Suppl 1):27–30PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Campbell ED (1987) Effect of range of motion on the success of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2:95–97PubMedCrossRef Ritter MA, Campbell ED (1987) Effect of range of motion on the success of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2:95–97PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE, Meding JB, Berend ME (2003) Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1278–1285PubMed Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE, Meding JB, Berend ME (2003) Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1278–1285PubMed
23.
go back to reference Schurman DJ, Rojer DE (2005) Total knee arthroplasty—range of motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 430:132–137PubMedCrossRef Schurman DJ, Rojer DE (2005) Total knee arthroplasty—range of motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 430:132–137PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Seon JK, Song EK, Lee JY (2005) Comparison of range of motion of high-flexion prosthesis and mobile-bearing prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 28(Suppl):1247–1250 Seon JK, Song EK, Lee JY (2005) Comparison of range of motion of high-flexion prosthesis and mobile-bearing prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 28(Suppl):1247–1250
25.
go back to reference Stiehl JB, Voorhorst PE, Keblish P, Sorrells RB (1997) Comparison of range of motion after posterior cruciate ligament retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 10:216–220PubMed Stiehl JB, Voorhorst PE, Keblish P, Sorrells RB (1997) Comparison of range of motion after posterior cruciate ligament retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 10:216–220PubMed
26.
go back to reference Ververeli PA, Sutton DC, Hearn SL (1995) Continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty. Analysis of cost and benefit. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:208–215PubMed Ververeli PA, Sutton DC, Hearn SL (1995) Continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty. Analysis of cost and benefit. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:208–215PubMed
27.
go back to reference Worland RL, Arredondo J, Angels F, Lopez-Jimenerz F, Jessup DE (1998) Home continuous passive motion machine versus professional physical therapy following total knee replacement. J Arthroplasty 13:784–787PubMedCrossRef Worland RL, Arredondo J, Angels F, Lopez-Jimenerz F, Jessup DE (1998) Home continuous passive motion machine versus professional physical therapy following total knee replacement. J Arthroplasty 13:784–787PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Range of motion during the perioperative period in total knee arthroplasty
Authors
Yoshinori Ishii
Hideo Noguchi
Yoshikazu Matsuda
Mitsuhiro Takeda
Hiroshi Kiga
Shin-ichi Toyabe
Publication date
01-08-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 8/2008
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0448-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2008

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 8/2008 Go to the issue