Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 6/2005

01-07-2005 | Original Article

Comparison between two methods of drain clamping after total knee arthroplasty

Authors: Narayana Prasad, Vinod Padmanabhan, Arun Mullaji

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 6/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

To study the clinical outcome of two methods of drain clamping after total knee arthroplasty and to determine the effect on blood loss and blood transfusion.

Patients and methods

A prospective study involving 73 patients, randomized into two groups. Group 1 included patients in whom the drain was clamped for 1 h postoperatively, after which it was released and kept open for 48 h. Group 2 included patients in whom the drain was clamped and released for 10 min every 2 h for 24 h. The drain was removed at 48 h in both groups. Patient’s demographic details, intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, and haemoglobin values on the preoperative and postoperative days (1, 4, 7, 14) were recorded.

Results

The mean postoperative drainage in group 1 was 520.65±170 ml, which was significantly higher than that of group 2, 367.62±141.1 ml (p<0.05, Student’s t-test). The drain charting shows 65% of drainage volume occurs in the first 8 h in both groups. The study suggests a reduction in the incidence of blood transfusion in the 2-hourly groups, although it was not statistically significant. There was a difference in the haemoglobin drop between both groups, but statistically the p value was marginally above 0.05 (p=0.086) and hence not significant.

Conclusion

The method of 2-hourly clamping of drain and release for 10 min significantly reduces postoperative blood loss, without any added increase of complication, after total knee arthroplasty.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adalberth G, Bystrom S, Kolstad K, Mallminn H, Milbrink J (1998) Postoperative drainage of knee arthroplasty is not necessary: a randomized study. Acta Orthop Scand 69:475–478PubMed Adalberth G, Bystrom S, Kolstad K, Mallminn H, Milbrink J (1998) Postoperative drainage of knee arthroplasty is not necessary: a randomized study. Acta Orthop Scand 69:475–478PubMed
2.
go back to reference Akizuki S, Yasukawa Y, Takizawa T (1997) A new method of haemostasis for cement less total knee arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 56:222–224PubMed Akizuki S, Yasukawa Y, Takizawa T (1997) A new method of haemostasis for cement less total knee arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 56:222–224PubMed
3.
go back to reference Beer KJ, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH (1991) The efficacy of suction drains after routine total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:584–587PubMed Beer KJ, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH (1991) The efficacy of suction drains after routine total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:584–587PubMed
4.
go back to reference Brueggemann PM, Tucker JK, Wilson P (1999) Intermittent clamping of suction drains in total hip replacement reduces postoperative blood loss: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 14: 470–472PubMed Brueggemann PM, Tucker JK, Wilson P (1999) Intermittent clamping of suction drains in total hip replacement reduces postoperative blood loss: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 14: 470–472PubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Crevoisier XM, Reber P, Noesberger B (1998) Is suction drainage necessary after total joint arthroplasty? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117:124 Crevoisier XM, Reber P, Noesberger B (1998) Is suction drainage necessary after total joint arthroplasty? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117:124
7.
go back to reference Cushner FD, Friedman RJ (1991) Blood loss in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 269:98–101PubMed Cushner FD, Friedman RJ (1991) Blood loss in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 269:98–101PubMed
8.
go back to reference Drinkwater CJ, Neil MJ (1995) Optimal timing of wound drain removal following total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:185–189PubMed Drinkwater CJ, Neil MJ (1995) Optimal timing of wound drain removal following total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:185–189PubMed
9.
go back to reference Holt BT, Parks NL, EngH GA, Lawrence JM (1997) Comparison of closed-suction drainage and no drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 20:1121–1124 Holt BT, Parks NL, EngH GA, Lawrence JM (1997) Comparison of closed-suction drainage and no drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics 20:1121–1124
10.
go back to reference Kim Y-H, Cho S-H, Kim RS (1998) Drainage versus non drainage in simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 347:188–193PubMed Kim Y-H, Cho S-H, Kim RS (1998) Drainage versus non drainage in simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 347:188–193PubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Mengal B, Aebi J, Rodriquez A, Lemaire RA (2001) Prospective randomized study of wound drainage versus non-drainage in primary total hip or knee arthroplasty [French-English abstract]. Rev Chirurgic Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87: 29–39 Mengal B, Aebi J, Rodriquez A, Lemaire RA (2001) Prospective randomized study of wound drainage versus non-drainage in primary total hip or knee arthroplasty [French-English abstract]. Rev Chirurgic Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87: 29–39
13.
go back to reference Ovadia D, Luger E, Bickels J et al (1997) Efficacy of closed wound drainage after total joint arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 12:317–321PubMed Ovadia D, Luger E, Bickels J et al (1997) Efficacy of closed wound drainage after total joint arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 12:317–321PubMed
14.
go back to reference Reilly TJ, Gradisar IA Jr, Pakan W, Reilly M (1986) The use of postoperative suction drainage in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 208:238–242PubMed Reilly TJ, Gradisar IA Jr, Pakan W, Reilly M (1986) The use of postoperative suction drainage in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 208:238–242PubMed
15.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM (1994) Closed wound drainage in total hip or total knee replacement. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:35–38PubMed Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM (1994) Closed wound drainage in total hip or total knee replacement. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:35–38PubMed
16.
go back to reference Ryu J, Sakamoto A, Honda T, Saito S (1997) The postoperative drain-clamping method for haemostasis in total knee arthroplasty: reducing postoperative bleeding in total knee arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 56:251–254PubMed Ryu J, Sakamoto A, Honda T, Saito S (1997) The postoperative drain-clamping method for haemostasis in total knee arthroplasty: reducing postoperative bleeding in total knee arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 56:251–254PubMed
17.
go back to reference Sakihara H, Fukubayashi T, Okuwaki T (1988) A method to control postoperative bleeding after total knee replacement [in Japanese]. Orthop Surg Traumatol 31:543 Sakihara H, Fukubayashi T, Okuwaki T (1988) A method to control postoperative bleeding after total knee replacement [in Japanese]. Orthop Surg Traumatol 31:543
18.
go back to reference Sedna H, Nomurak, Hirano M et al (1990) Total blood loss in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of drains clamped and non drain-clamped operation [in Japanese; English abstract]. Seikeigekatosaigaigeka 37:1739 Sedna H, Nomurak, Hirano M et al (1990) Total blood loss in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of drains clamped and non drain-clamped operation [in Japanese; English abstract]. Seikeigekatosaigaigeka 37:1739
19.
go back to reference Yamada K, Imaizumi T, Uemura M, Takada N, Kim Y (2001) Comparison between 1-hour and 24-hour drain clamping using diluted epinephrine solution after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:458–462PubMed Yamada K, Imaizumi T, Uemura M, Takada N, Kim Y (2001) Comparison between 1-hour and 24-hour drain clamping using diluted epinephrine solution after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:458–462PubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison between two methods of drain clamping after total knee arthroplasty
Authors
Narayana Prasad
Vinod Padmanabhan
Arun Mullaji
Publication date
01-07-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 6/2005
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-005-0813-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2005

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 6/2005 Go to the issue