Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 8/2004

01-10-2004 | Original Article

Computed tomography determined femoral torsion is not accurate

Authors: R. L. Jaarsma, A. W. A. Bruggeman, D. F. M. Pakvis, N. Verdonschot, J. A. M. Lemmens, A. van Kampen

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 8/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Computed tomography (CT) is considered the method of choice for detecting rotational malalignment of the femur. However, it is unclear how reliable the method is, and what the causes are of potential inaccuracies.

Materials and methods

To address these issues three observers measured the CT images of the femur of 76 patients on two separate occasions. The images were made during follow-up of a unilateral femoral shaft fractures. Rotational malalignment was determined by comparing the torsion angle of the injured to the noninjured leg.

Results

The pooled intraobserver variance was 3.9° and interobserver variance 4.1°. Of the two measurements of one observer 95% were up to 10.8° different, and between observers 95% of the measurements were up to 15.6° different.

Conclusions

CT measurements of rotational malalignment of the femur are not accurate. This is due principally to the difficulty in defining a line through the axis of the femoral neck. The accuracy can be improved by taking the average of two measurements.
Literature
1.
2.
Bråten M, Terjesen T, Rossvoll I (1992) Femoral anteversion in normal adults: ultrasound measurements in 50 men and 50 women. Acta Orthop Scand 63:29–32PubMed
3.
Bråten M, Terjesen T, Rossvoll I (1993) Torsional deformity after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:799–803PubMed
4.
Dunlap K, Shands AR Jr, Hollister LC Jr, Gaul JS Jr, Streit HA (1953) A new method for determination of torsion of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 35:289–311
5.
Dunn DM (1952) Anteversion of the neck of the femur: a method of measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Br181–186
6.
Ehrenstein T, Rikli DA, Peine R, Gutberlet M, Mittlmeier T, Banzer D, Mäurer J, Felix R (1999) A new ultrasound-based method for the assessment of torsional differences following closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. Skeletal Radiol 28:336–341CrossRefPubMed
7.
Jaarsma RL, Pakvis DFM, Verdonschot N, Biert J, van Kampen A (2004) Rotational malalignment after intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. J Orthop Trauma (in press)
8.
Jeanmart L, Baert AL, Wackenheim A (1983) Computer tomography of neck, chest, spine and limbs. Atlas of pathologic computer tomography, vol 3. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 171–177
9.
Kuo TY, Skedros JG, Bloebaum RD (2003) Measurement of femoral anteversion by biplane radiography and computed tomography imaging: comparison with anatomic reference. Invest Radiol 38:221–229CrossRefPubMed
10.
Sennerich T, Sutter P, Ritter G, Zapf S (1992) Computertomographische Kontrolle des Antetorsionwinkels nach Oberschenkelschaftfrakturen des Erwachsenen. Unfallchirurg 95:301–305PubMed
11.
Starker M, Hanusek S, Rittmeister M, Thoma W (1998) Validation of computerized tomography antetorsion angle measurement of the femur. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 136:420–427PubMed
12.
Strecker W, Franzreb M, Pfeiffer T, Pokar S, Wikström M, Kinzl L (1994) Computerized tomography measurement of torsion angle of the lower extremities. Unfallchirurg 97:609–613
13.
Svenningsen S, Apalset K, Terjesen T, Anda S (1989) Regression of femoral anteversion: a prospective study of intoeing children. Acta Orthop Scand 60:170–173PubMed
14.
Terjesen T, Anda S, Svenningsen S (1990) Femoral anteversion in adolescents and adults measured by ultrasound. Clin Orthop 256:274–279PubMed
15.
Wissing H et al. (1986) Determination of rotational defects of the femur by computer tomographic determination of antetorsion angle of the femoral neck. Unfallchirurg 12:1–11
16.
Wissing H, Buddenbrock B (1993) Determining rotational errors of the femur by axial computerized tomography in comparison with clinical and conventional radiologic determination. Unfallchirurg 19:145–157
Metadata
Title
Computed tomography determined femoral torsion is not accurate
Authors
R. L. Jaarsma
A. W. A. Bruggeman
D. F. M. Pakvis
N. Verdonschot
J. A. M. Lemmens
A. van Kampen
Publication date
01-10-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 8/2004
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0729-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2004

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 8/2004 Go to the issue

Case Report

Management of a traumatically avulsed skin-flap on the dorsum of the foot

Case Report

Intra-articular synovial hemangioma; a rare cause of knee pain and swelling

Original Article

Pin site care in external fixation sodium chloride or chlorhexidine solution as a cleansing agent

Original Article

Hybrid external fixation of distal tibial fractures: new strategy to place pins and wires without penetrating the anterior compartment

Original Article

Displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children: open reduction vs. closed reduction and pinning

Original Article

The German version of the Oxford shoulder score—cross-cultural adaptation and validation