Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Original Article

Extraperitoneal sigmoidostomy: a surgical approach with less complications and better functions for abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to explore the safety and function of extraperitoneal sigmoidostomy for patients with rectal cancer who underwent abdominoperineal resection.

Methods

We systematically reviewed records of patients with rectal cancer who underwent abdominoperineal resection and extraperitoneal or intraperitoneal sigmoidostomy from January 2010 to December 2014 at our department. They were grouped into the extraperitoneal (group A) and intraperitoneal sigmoidostomy (group B) groups. Clinical data were collected and statistically analyzed.

Results

A total of 231 consecutive cases were included: 108 cases in group A and 123 in group B. Patient demographics were similar in both groups. Group A was associated with less time for sigmoidostomy (19.6 ± 2.8 vs. 27.0 ± 4.5 min, p < 0.001), shorter postoperative hospitalization (6.4 ± 1.3 vs. 6.9 ± 1.6 days, p = 0.036), less incidence of stoma-related complications (p = 0.002) and less possibility of re-operation related to stomal complications (p = 0.037). Functions of stoma including stimulation of excrement, stimulating time for excrement, frequency of excrement, self-controlled ability of excrement, and regularity of excrement were all better than those in group B patients (p < 0.001, < 0.001, 0.018, 0.004, and 0.001, respectively). Patients in group A had less psychological problems including anxiety (p = 0.008), depression (p = 0.045), and impaired social interaction (p = 0.010).

Conclusions

Extraperitoneal sigmoidostomy is associated with shorter operative duration and postoperative hospitalization and has fewer complications and better outcome for abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer, and patients also had less psychological problems.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F et al (2016) Cancer statistics in China,2015. CA Cancer J Clin 66:115–132CrossRefPubMed Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F et al (2016) Cancer statistics in China,2015. CA Cancer J Clin 66:115–132CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gu J, Chen N (2013) Current status of rectal cancer treatment in China. Color Dis 15:1345–1350CrossRef Gu J, Chen N (2013) Current status of rectal cancer treatment in China. Color Dis 15:1345–1350CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yan HS, Yao N (2013) Current status of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 16:498–500PubMed Yan HS, Yao N (2013) Current status of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 16:498–500PubMed
4.
go back to reference Gopall J, Shen XF, Cheng Y (2012) Current status of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 203:230–241CrossRefPubMed Gopall J, Shen XF, Cheng Y (2012) Current status of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 203:230–241CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Simillis C, Baird DL, Kontovounisios C, Pawa N, Brown G, Rasheed S et al (2017) A systematic review to assess resection margin status after abdominoperineal excision and pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 265:291–299CrossRefPubMed Simillis C, Baird DL, Kontovounisios C, Pawa N, Brown G, Rasheed S et al (2017) A systematic review to assess resection margin status after abdominoperineal excision and pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 265:291–299CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference van der Linden YT, Boersma D, Bosscha K, Lips DJ, Prins HA (2016) Use of a multi-instrument access device in abdominoperineal resections. J Minim Access Surg 12:248–253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van der Linden YT, Boersma D, Bosscha K, Lips DJ, Prins HA (2016) Use of a multi-instrument access device in abdominoperineal resections. J Minim Access Surg 12:248–253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Eftaiha SM, Pai A, Sulo S, Park JJ, Prasad LM, Marecik SJ (2016) Robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: clinical, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 59:607–614CrossRefPubMed Eftaiha SM, Pai A, Sulo S, Park JJ, Prasad LM, Marecik SJ (2016) Robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: clinical, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 59:607–614CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Shen Z, Ye Y, Jiang K, Xie Q, Yang X, Shen K et al (2016) Application of transperineal single-port access assisted extralevator abdominoperineal excision in low rectal cancer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 19:274–277PubMed Shen Z, Ye Y, Jiang K, Xie Q, Yang X, Shen K et al (2016) Application of transperineal single-port access assisted extralevator abdominoperineal excision in low rectal cancer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 19:274–277PubMed
9.
go back to reference Mukkai Krishnamurty D, Wise PE (2016) Importance of surgical margins in rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 113:323–332CrossRefPubMed Mukkai Krishnamurty D, Wise PE (2016) Importance of surgical margins in rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 113:323–332CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hamada M, Ozaki K, Muraoka G, Kawakita N, Nishioka Y (2012) Permanent end-sigmoid colostomy through the extraperitoneal route prevents parastomal hernia afterlaparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 55:963–969CrossRefPubMed Hamada M, Ozaki K, Muraoka G, Kawakita N, Nishioka Y (2012) Permanent end-sigmoid colostomy through the extraperitoneal route prevents parastomal hernia afterlaparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 55:963–969CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hamada M, Nishioka Y, Nishimura T, Goto M, Furukita Y, Ozaki K et al (2008) Laparoscopic permanent sigmoid stoma creation through the extraperitoneal route. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:483–485 Hamada M, Nishioka Y, Nishimura T, Goto M, Furukita Y, Ozaki K et al (2008) Laparoscopic permanent sigmoid stoma creation through the extraperitoneal route. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:483–485
12.
go back to reference Akamoto S, Noge S, Uemura J, Maeda N, Ohshima M, Kashiwagi H et al (2013) Extraperitoneal colostomy in laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection using a laparoscopic retractor. Surg Today 43:580–582CrossRefPubMed Akamoto S, Noge S, Uemura J, Maeda N, Ohshima M, Kashiwagi H et al (2013) Extraperitoneal colostomy in laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection using a laparoscopic retractor. Surg Today 43:580–582CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Shiraishi T, Tomizawa N, Ando T, Arakawa K, Kobayashi K, Muroya K et al (2014) Extraperitoneal colostomy in laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection using a hand inserted from the perineal side. Asian J Endosc Surg 7:89–92CrossRefPubMed Shiraishi T, Tomizawa N, Ando T, Arakawa K, Kobayashi K, Muroya K et al (2014) Extraperitoneal colostomy in laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection using a hand inserted from the perineal side. Asian J Endosc Surg 7:89–92CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Leroy J, Diana M, Callari C, Barry B, D’Agostino J, HS W et al (2012) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal colostomy in elective abdominoperineal resection for cancer: a single surgeon experience. Color Dis 14:618–622CrossRef Leroy J, Diana M, Callari C, Barry B, D’Agostino J, HS W et al (2012) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal colostomy in elective abdominoperineal resection for cancer: a single surgeon experience. Color Dis 14:618–622CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lian L, Wu XR, He XS, Zou YF, Wu XJ, Lan P et al (2012) Extraperitoneal vs. intraperitoneal route for permanent colostomy: a meta-analysis of 1,071patients. Int J Color Dis 27:59–64CrossRef Lian L, Wu XR, He XS, Zou YF, Wu XJ, Lan P et al (2012) Extraperitoneal vs. intraperitoneal route for permanent colostomy: a meta-analysis of 1,071patients. Int J Color Dis 27:59–64CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Heiying J, Yonghong D, Xiaofeng W, Hang Y, Kunlan W, Bei Z et al (2014) A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2:58–62CrossRef Heiying J, Yonghong D, Xiaofeng W, Hang Y, Kunlan W, Bei Z et al (2014) A study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy after abdomino-perineal resection for rectal cancer. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2:58–62CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Koc U, Karaman K, Gomceli I, Dalgic T, Ozer I, Ulas M et al (2017) A retrospective analysis of factors affecting early stoma complications. Ostomy Wound Manage 63:28–32PubMed Koc U, Karaman K, Gomceli I, Dalgic T, Ozer I, Ulas M et al (2017) A retrospective analysis of factors affecting early stoma complications. Ostomy Wound Manage 63:28–32PubMed
18.
go back to reference Song IH, Ha HK, Choi SG, Jeon BG, Kim MJ, Park KJ (2012) Analysis of risk factors for the development of incisional and parastomal hernias in patients after colorectal surgery. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 28:299–303CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Song IH, Ha HK, Choi SG, Jeon BG, Kim MJ, Park KJ (2012) Analysis of risk factors for the development of incisional and parastomal hernias in patients after colorectal surgery. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 28:299–303CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Jin HY, Du YH, Wang XF, Yao H, Wu KL, Zhang B et al (2013) Manufacture and application of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 16:985–988PubMed Jin HY, Du YH, Wang XF, Yao H, Wu KL, Zhang B et al (2013) Manufacture and application of laparoscopic extraperitoneal sigmoid colostomy. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 16:985–988PubMed
20.
go back to reference DeAsis FJ, Lapin B, Gitelis ME, Ujiki MB (2015) Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 21:8670–8677CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral DeAsis FJ, Lapin B, Gitelis ME, Ujiki MB (2015) Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 21:8670–8677CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Warwick AM, Velineni R, Smart NJ, Daniels IR (2016) Onlay parastomal hernia repair with cross-linked porcine dermal collagen biologic mesh: long-term results. Hernia 20:321–325CrossRefPubMed Warwick AM, Velineni R, Smart NJ, Daniels IR (2016) Onlay parastomal hernia repair with cross-linked porcine dermal collagen biologic mesh: long-term results. Hernia 20:321–325CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Goligher JC (1958) Extraperitoneal colostomy or ileostomy. Br J Surg (46):97–103 Goligher JC (1958) Extraperitoneal colostomy or ileostomy. Br J Surg (46):97–103
23.
go back to reference Wang FB, Pu YW, Zhong FY, Lv XD, Yang ZX, Xing CG (2015) Laparoscopic permanent sigmoid stoma creation through the extraperitoneal route versus transperitoneal route. A meta-analysis of stoma-related complications. Saudi Med J 36(2):159–163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang FB, Pu YW, Zhong FY, Lv XD, Yang ZX, Xing CG (2015) Laparoscopic permanent sigmoid stoma creation through the extraperitoneal route versus transperitoneal route. A meta-analysis of stoma-related complications. Saudi Med J 36(2):159–163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Extraperitoneal sigmoidostomy: a surgical approach with less complications and better functions for abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer
Publication date
01-01-2018
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2931-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2018 Go to the issue