Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 12/2017

01-12-2017 | Short Communication

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for giant benign rectal tumours: is large size a contraindication?

Authors: Audrius Dulskas, Alfredas Kilius, Kestutis Petrulis, Narimantas E. Samalavicius

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to look at our early postoperative results, recurrence rates and need for further radical surgery in treating large (> 5 cm) rectal tumours by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).

Methods

Patients who underwent TEM for rectal tumours greater than 5 cm were included. Tumour diameter was determined based on fresh specimen measurements. We recorded the demographics, operative details, final pathology, length of hospital stay, complications and recurrence rates.

Results

Mean tumour size was 5.9 ± 1.5 cm. 68.4% of tumours (13/19) were in the middle part of the rectum. Three patients (15.8%) developed postoperative complications: two had postoperative bleeding (10.5%), one had wound dehiscence (5.3%). Three patients had involved margins (15.8%). After a median follow up of 25.2 months, there were two recurrences (10.5%). One patient developed rectal cancer 6 years after removal of rectal adenoma.

Conclusion

TEM is feasible and safe for the treatment of giant benign rectal tumours. It may be an alternative method for proctectomy in selected patients.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Dulskas A, Samalavicius NE (2016) A prospective study of sexual and urinary function before and after total mesorectal excision. Int J Color Dis 31(6):1125–1130CrossRef Dulskas A, Samalavicius NE (2016) A prospective study of sexual and urinary function before and after total mesorectal excision. Int J Color Dis 31(6):1125–1130CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Samalavicius NE, Dulskas A, Lasinskas M, Smailyte G (2016) Validity and reliability of a Lithuanian version of low anterior resection syndrome score. Tech Coloproctol 20:215–220CrossRefPubMed Samalavicius NE, Dulskas A, Lasinskas M, Smailyte G (2016) Validity and reliability of a Lithuanian version of low anterior resection syndrome score. Tech Coloproctol 20:215–220CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Clancy C, Burke JP, Albert MR, O’Connell PR, Winter DC (2015) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus stadard transanal excision for the removal of rectal neoplasms: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon rectum 58:254–261 Clancy C, Burke JP, Albert MR, O’Connell PR, Winter DC (2015) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus stadard transanal excision for the removal of rectal neoplasms: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon rectum 58:254–261
5.
go back to reference Dulskas A, Kilius A, Petrulis K, Samalavicius NE (2017) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal tumours: single institution experience. Annals of Colopr Ahead of print Dulskas A, Kilius A, Petrulis K, Samalavicius NE (2017) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal tumours: single institution experience. Annals of Colopr Ahead of print
6.
go back to reference Barendse RM, van den Broek FJ, van Schooten J, Bemelman WA, Fockens P, de Graaf EJ, Dekker E, TREND study group (2012) Endoscopic mucosal resection vs transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of large rectal adenomas. Color Dis 14:191–196CrossRef Barendse RM, van den Broek FJ, van Schooten J, Bemelman WA, Fockens P, de Graaf EJ, Dekker E, TREND study group (2012) Endoscopic mucosal resection vs transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of large rectal adenomas. Color Dis 14:191–196CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Luigiano C, Consolo P, Scaffidi MG, Strangio G, Giacobbe G, Alibrandi A, Pallio S, Tortora A, Melita G, Familiari L (2009) Endoscopic mucosal resection for large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up. Endoscopy 41:829–835CrossRefPubMed Luigiano C, Consolo P, Scaffidi MG, Strangio G, Giacobbe G, Alibrandi A, Pallio S, Tortora A, Melita G, Familiari L (2009) Endoscopic mucosal resection for large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up. Endoscopy 41:829–835CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Allaix ME, Arezzo A, Cassoni P, Famiglietti F, Morino M (2012) Recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large rectal adenomas. Surg Endosc 26:2594–2600CrossRefPubMed Allaix ME, Arezzo A, Cassoni P, Famiglietti F, Morino M (2012) Recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large rectal adenomas. Surg Endosc 26:2594–2600CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Khoury R, Duek SD, Issa N, Khoury W (2016) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large benign rectal tumors; where are the limits? Int J Surg 29:128–131CrossRefPubMed Khoury R, Duek SD, Issa N, Khoury W (2016) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large benign rectal tumors; where are the limits? Int J Surg 29:128–131CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Levic K, Bulut O, Hesselfeldt P (2014) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for giant polyps of the rectum. Tech Coloproctol 18:521–527CrossRefPubMed Levic K, Bulut O, Hesselfeldt P (2014) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for giant polyps of the rectum. Tech Coloproctol 18:521–527CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Levic K, Bulut O, Hesselfeldt P, Bülow S (2013) The outcome of rectal cancer after early salvage TME following TEM compared with primary TME: a case-matched study. Tech Coloproctol 17:397–403CrossRefPubMed Levic K, Bulut O, Hesselfeldt P, Bülow S (2013) The outcome of rectal cancer after early salvage TME following TEM compared with primary TME: a case-matched study. Tech Coloproctol 17:397–403CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for giant benign rectal tumours: is large size a contraindication?
Authors
Audrius Dulskas
Alfredas Kilius
Kestutis Petrulis
Narimantas E. Samalavicius
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2910-9

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 12/2017 Go to the issue