Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 10/2017

01-10-2017 | Original Article

Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after middle and low rectal cancer resection without diverting stoma: a retrospective study of 319 consecutive patients

Authors: Wei Zhang, Zheng Lou, Qizhi Liu, Ronggui Meng, Haifeng Gong, Liqiang Hao, Peng Liu, Ge Sun, Jun Ma, Wei Zhang

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) after anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer in order to help surgeons to decide which patients could benefit from a diverting stoma.

Methods

Data on 319 patients having a middle and low rectal cancer resection with anastomosis between May 2011 and October 2015 from two hospitals were included in the study. The analysis included the following variables: patient-related variables (gender, age, diabetes mellitus, ASA score, preoperative radiochemotherapy, body mass index, blood hemoglobin, and serum albumin level), tumor-related variables (K-ras status, distance of tumor from the anal verge, histopathologic grade, pathological T stage, pathological N stage, pathological M stage, TNM stage, and tumor size), and surgery-related variables (laparoscopic or open surgery, blood loss, and operative time). Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were carried out to identify risk factors for AL.

Results

The AL rate was 11.91% (38/319). Male (OR 2.898, 95% CI 1.265–6.637, p = 0.012), diabetes mellitus (OR 2.482, 95% CI 1.004–6.134, p = 0.049), K-ras mutation (OR 2.544, 95% CI 1.210–5.348, p = 0.014), distance of tumor from the anal verge (OR 3.445, 95% CI 1.631–7.279, p = 0.001), and preoperative radiochemotherapy (OR 2.790, 95% CI 1.056–7.372, p = 0.039) were independent risk factors of AL. One (2.63%) in 38 patients with AL presented with no risk factor of AL, 6 (15.8%) in 38 patients with 1 risk factor, 16 (42.1%) in 38 patients with 2 risk factors, 9 (23.7%) in 38 patients with 3 risk factors, and 6 (15.7%) in 38 patients with 4 risk factors. No patient with 5 risk factors in our study. AL rate increased with the elevated number of risk factors clustering in individuals.

Conclusions

K-ras mutation is first reported to be an independent risk factor for AL after sphincter-preserving surgery without diverting stoma. A diverting stoma should be performed in sphincter-preserving surgery for middle and low rectal cancer patients with 2 or more risk factors identified in this analysis.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Vinodkumar N, Khan ZA (2009) Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 96(9):1066–1075. doi:10.1002/bjs.6694 CrossRef Vinodkumar N, Khan ZA (2009) Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 96(9):1066–1075. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​6694 CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P (2015) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253(5):890–899. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182128929 CrossRef Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P (2015) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253(5):890–899. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3182128929​ CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Vasiliu EC, Zarnescu NO, Costea R, Neagu S (2015) Review of risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Chirurgia (Bucur) 110(4):319–326 Vasiliu EC, Zarnescu NO, Costea R, Neagu S (2015) Review of risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Chirurgia (Bucur) 110(4):319–326
5.
go back to reference McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC (2015) Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 102(5):462–479. doi:10.1002/bjs.9697 CrossRefPubMed McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC (2015) Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 102(5):462–479. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​9697 CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Portier G, Ghouti L, Kirzin S, Guimbaud R, Rives M, Lazorthes F (2007) Oncological outcome of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis with and without intersphincteric resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 94(3):341–345. doi:10.1002/bjs.5621 CrossRefPubMed Portier G, Ghouti L, Kirzin S, Guimbaud R, Rives M, Lazorthes F (2007) Oncological outcome of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis with and without intersphincteric resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 94(3):341–345. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​5621 CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Koyama M, Murata A, Sakamoto Y, Morohashi H, Hasebe T, Saito T, Hakamada K (2016) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after intersphincteric resection without a protective defunctioning stoma for lower rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol Suppl 2:S249–S256. doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4461-z CrossRef Koyama M, Murata A, Sakamoto Y, Morohashi H, Hasebe T, Saito T, Hakamada K (2016) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after intersphincteric resection without a protective defunctioning stoma for lower rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol Suppl 2:S249–S256. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-015-4461-z CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Parthasarathy M, Greensmith M, Bowers D, Groot-Wassink T (2017) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection: a retrospective analysis of 17518 patients. Colorectal Dis 19(3):288–298. doi:10.1111/codi.13476 CrossRefPubMed Parthasarathy M, Greensmith M, Bowers D, Groot-Wassink T (2017) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection: a retrospective analysis of 17518 patients. Colorectal Dis 19(3):288–298. doi:10.​1111/​codi.​13476 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hu MH, Huang RK, Zhao RS, Yang KL, Wang H (2017) Does neoadjuvant therapy increase the incidence of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for mid and low rectal cancer?A systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 19(1):16–26. doi:10.1111/codi.13424 CrossRefPubMed Hu MH, Huang RK, Zhao RS, Yang KL, Wang H (2017) Does neoadjuvant therapy increase the incidence of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for mid and low rectal cancer?A systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 19(1):16–26. doi:10.​1111/​codi.​13424 CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Vincenzi B, Cremolini C, Sartore-Bianchi A, Russo A, Mannavola F, Perrone G, Pantano F, Loupakis F, Rossini D, Ongaro E, Bonazzina E, Dell'Aquila E, Imperatori M, Zoccoli A, Bronte G, De Maglio G, Fontanini G, Natoli C, Falcone A, Santini D, Onetti-Muda A, Siena S, Tonini G, Aprile G (2015) Prognostic significance of K-Ras mutation rate in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Oncotarget 6(31):31604–31612. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.5231 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vincenzi B, Cremolini C, Sartore-Bianchi A, Russo A, Mannavola F, Perrone G, Pantano F, Loupakis F, Rossini D, Ongaro E, Bonazzina E, Dell'Aquila E, Imperatori M, Zoccoli A, Bronte G, De Maglio G, Fontanini G, Natoli C, Falcone A, Santini D, Onetti-Muda A, Siena S, Tonini G, Aprile G (2015) Prognostic significance of K-Ras mutation rate in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Oncotarget 6(31):31604–31612. doi:10.​18632/​oncotarget.​5231 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Rui Y, Wang C, Zhou Z, Zhong X, Yu Y (2015) K-Ras mutation and prognosis of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 62(137):19–24PubMed Rui Y, Wang C, Zhou Z, Zhong X, Yu Y (2015) K-Ras mutation and prognosis of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 62(137):19–24PubMed
13.
go back to reference Wang S, Liu J, Wang S, Zhao H, Ge S, Wang W (2017) Adverse effects of anastomotic leakage on local recurrence and survival after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 41(1):277–284. doi:10.1007/s00268-016-3761-1 CrossRefPubMed Wang S, Liu J, Wang S, Zhao H, Ge S, Wang W (2017) Adverse effects of anastomotic leakage on local recurrence and survival after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 41(1):277–284. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-016-3761-1 CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Warschkow R, Steffen T, Thierbach J, Bruckner T, Lange J, Tarantino I (2011) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection and reconstruction with colorectostomy. A retrospective study with bootstrap analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 18(10):2772–2782. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1696-1 CrossRefPubMed Warschkow R, Steffen T, Thierbach J, Bruckner T, Lange J, Tarantino I (2011) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection and reconstruction with colorectostomy. A retrospective study with bootstrap analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 18(10):2772–2782. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-011-1696-1 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after middle and low rectal cancer resection without diverting stoma: a retrospective study of 319 consecutive patients
Authors
Wei Zhang
Zheng Lou
Qizhi Liu
Ronggui Meng
Haifeng Gong
Liqiang Hao
Peng Liu
Ge Sun
Jun Ma
Wei Zhang
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2875-8

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 10/2017 Go to the issue