Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 6/2017

01-06-2017 | Original Article

Endoscopic ultrasonography and computed tomography scanning for preoperative staging of colonic cancer

Authors: ML Malmstrøm, I Gögenur, LB Riis, H Hassan, TW Klausen, T Perner, A Săftoiu, P Vilmann

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

With an increasing demand for more accurate preoperative staging methods for colon cancer, we aimed to compare preoperative tumour (T)- and nodal (N)-stage in patients with left-sided colon cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) with post-operative histology as gold standard.

Methods

A total of 44 patients were prospectively recruited at Herlev and Roskilde University Hospitals during November 2014–January 2016. Thirty-five patients were included in the final analysis and underwent EUS, CT and surgery within 2 weeks. Diagnostic values were evaluated for “low risk” (T1+T2+T3 with ≤5 mm extramural invasion) and “high risk” (T3 with >5 mm of extramural spread + T4) colonic cancer.

Results

Sensitivity and specificity in “low risk” colonic cancer evaluated with EUS was 0.90 [0.74;0.98] and 0.75 [0.19;0.99] and with CT 0.96 [0.80;0.99] and 0.25 [<0.01;0.81]. EUS and CT were poor in predicting N0 or N+ disease.

Conclusions

The sensitivity of EUS and CT were good and comparable regarding T-stage evaluation, while EUS had a significantly higher specificity in the evaluation of “low risk” tumours. The results obtained for “high risk” colonic cancer were difficult to evaluate due to small patient numbers. EUS could be considered as a supplement to CT scans in selecting patients for neoadjuvant therapies, or local transmural treatment, in the future.

Trial registration

NCT02324023
Literature
1.
go back to reference Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL et al (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. Cancer J Clin 65:87–108CrossRef Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL et al (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. Cancer J Clin 65:87–108CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Smith NJ, Bees N, Barbachano Y et al (2007) Preoperative computed tomography staging of nonmetastatic colon cancer predicts outcome: implications for clinical trials. Br J Cancer 96:1030–1036CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smith NJ, Bees N, Barbachano Y et al (2007) Preoperative computed tomography staging of nonmetastatic colon cancer predicts outcome: implications for clinical trials. Br J Cancer 96:1030–1036CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Foxtrot Collaborative Group (2012) Feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced, operable colon cancer: the pilot phase of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 13:1152–1160CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Foxtrot Collaborative Group (2012) Feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced, operable colon cancer: the pilot phase of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 13:1152–1160CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
5.
go back to reference Klessen C, Rogalla P, Taupitz M (2007) Local staging of rectal cancer: the current role of MRI. Eur Radiol 17:379–389CrossRefPubMed Klessen C, Rogalla P, Taupitz M (2007) Local staging of rectal cancer: the current role of MRI. Eur Radiol 17:379–389CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Puli SR, Reddy JBK, Bechtold ML et al (2009) Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose nodal invasion by rectal cancers: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1255–1265CrossRefPubMed Puli SR, Reddy JBK, Bechtold ML et al (2009) Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose nodal invasion by rectal cancers: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1255–1265CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Puli SR, Bechtold ML, Reddy JBK et al (2009) How good is endoscopic ultrasound in differentiating various T stages of rectal cancer? Meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 16:254–265CrossRefPubMed Puli SR, Bechtold ML, Reddy JBK et al (2009) How good is endoscopic ultrasound in differentiating various T stages of rectal cancer? Meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 16:254–265CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rollvén E, Holm T, Glimelius B et al (2013) Potentials of high resolution magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for preoperative local staging of colon cancer. Acta Radiol 54:722–730CrossRefPubMed Rollvén E, Holm T, Glimelius B et al (2013) Potentials of high resolution magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for preoperative local staging of colon cancer. Acta Radiol 54:722–730CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kongkam P, Linlawan S, Aniwan S et al (2014) Forward-viewing radial-array echoendoscope for staging of colon cancer beyond the rectum. World J Gastroenterol 20:2681–2687CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kongkam P, Linlawan S, Aniwan S et al (2014) Forward-viewing radial-array echoendoscope for staging of colon cancer beyond the rectum. World J Gastroenterol 20:2681–2687CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Malmstrøm ML, Săftoiu A, Vilmann P et al (2016) Endoscopic ultrasound for staging of colonic cancer proximal to the rectum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 5:307CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Malmstrøm ML, Săftoiu A, Vilmann P et al (2016) Endoscopic ultrasound for staging of colonic cancer proximal to the rectum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 5:307CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE et al (1997) AJCC cancer staging manual, 5th edn. Lippincott Raven, Philadelphia Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE et al (1997) AJCC cancer staging manual, 5th edn. Lippincott Raven, Philadelphia
12.
go back to reference Gersak MM, Badea R, Graur F et al (2015) Endoscopic ultrasound for the characterization and staging of rectal cancer. Current state of the method. Technological advances and perspectives. Med Ultrason 17:227–234CrossRefPubMed Gersak MM, Badea R, Graur F et al (2015) Endoscopic ultrasound for the characterization and staging of rectal cancer. Current state of the method. Technological advances and perspectives. Med Ultrason 17:227–234CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Beck DE, Wexner SD, Hull T et al (2014) The ASCRS manual of colon and rectal surgery, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRef Beck DE, Wexner SD, Hull T et al (2014) The ASCRS manual of colon and rectal surgery, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
15.
16.
go back to reference Dighe S, Swift I, Magill L et al (2012) Accuracy of radiological staging in identifying high-risk colon cancer patients suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multicentre experience. Color Dis 14:438–444CrossRef Dighe S, Swift I, Magill L et al (2012) Accuracy of radiological staging in identifying high-risk colon cancer patients suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multicentre experience. Color Dis 14:438–444CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jepsen RK, Ingeholm P, Lund EL (2012) Upstaging of early colorectal cancers following improved lymph node yield after methylene blue injection. Histopathology 61:788–794CrossRefPubMed Jepsen RK, Ingeholm P, Lund EL (2012) Upstaging of early colorectal cancers following improved lymph node yield after methylene blue injection. Histopathology 61:788–794CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference World Medical Association (2013) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310:2191–2194CrossRef World Medical Association (2013) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310:2191–2194CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ; DOI: 10. 1136/bmj.h5527 Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ; DOI: 10. 1136/bmj.h5527
20.
go back to reference Hunter C, Brown G (2016) Pre-operative staging of rectal cancer: a review of imaging techniques. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol May 10:1011–1025 Hunter C, Brown G (2016) Pre-operative staging of rectal cancer: a review of imaging techniques. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol May 10:1011–1025
21.
go back to reference Badea R, Gersak MM, Dudea SM et al (2015) Characterization and staging of rectal tumors: endoscopic ultrasound versus MRI/CT. Pictorial essay Med Ultrason 17:241–247 Badea R, Gersak MM, Dudea SM et al (2015) Characterization and staging of rectal tumors: endoscopic ultrasound versus MRI/CT. Pictorial essay Med Ultrason 17:241–247
22.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216CrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Fröhlich E, Muller R, Cui X-W et al (2015) Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound for quantification of tissue perfusion. J Ultrasound Med 34:179–196CrossRefPubMed Fröhlich E, Muller R, Cui X-W et al (2015) Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound for quantification of tissue perfusion. J Ultrasound Med 34:179–196CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Akbari RP, Wong WD (2003) Endorectal ultrasound and the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Scand J Surg 92:25–33PubMed Akbari RP, Wong WD (2003) Endorectal ultrasound and the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Scand J Surg 92:25–33PubMed
25.
go back to reference Pasquali S, Yim G, Vohra RS et al Survival after neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments compared to surgery alone for resectable esophageal carcinoma: a network meta-analysis. Ann Surg. doi:10.1097/SLA. 0000000000001905 Pasquali S, Yim G, Vohra RS et al Survival after neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments compared to surgery alone for resectable esophageal carcinoma: a network meta-analysis. Ann Surg. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​ 0000000000001905​
26.
go back to reference Richter-Schrag H-J, Walker C, Thimme R et al (2016) Full thickness resection device (FTRD). Experience and outcome for benign neoplasms of the rectum and colon. Der Chir Zeitschrift für alle Gebiete der Oper Medizen 87:316–325CrossRef Richter-Schrag H-J, Walker C, Thimme R et al (2016) Full thickness resection device (FTRD). Experience and outcome for benign neoplasms of the rectum and colon. Der Chir Zeitschrift für alle Gebiete der Oper Medizen 87:316–325CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Toh E-W, Brown P, Morris E et al (2015) Area of submucosal invasion and width of invasion predicts lymph node metastasis in pT1 colorectal cancers. Dis Colon Rectum 58:393–400 Toh E-W, Brown P, Morris E et al (2015) Area of submucosal invasion and width of invasion predicts lymph node metastasis in pT1 colorectal cancers. Dis Colon Rectum 58:393–400
28.
go back to reference Lascarides C, Buscaglia JM, Denoya PI et al (2016) Laparoscopic right colectomy vs laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy for endoscopically unresectable polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Color Dis 18:1050–1056CrossRef Lascarides C, Buscaglia JM, Denoya PI et al (2016) Laparoscopic right colectomy vs laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy for endoscopically unresectable polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Color Dis 18:1050–1056CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Endoscopic ultrasonography and computed tomography scanning for preoperative staging of colonic cancer
Authors
ML Malmstrøm
I Gögenur
LB Riis
H Hassan
TW Klausen
T Perner
A Săftoiu
P Vilmann
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2820-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 6/2017 Go to the issue