Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 12/2015

01-12-2015 | Original Article

Anastomotic leakage after curative rectal cancer resection has no impact on long-term survival: a propensity score analysis

Authors: Sabrina M. Ebinger, René Warschkow, Ignazio Tarantino, Bruno M. Schmied, Lukas Marti

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 12/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe and frequent complication of rectal cancer resection, with an incidence rate of approximately 9 %. Although the impact of AL on morbidity and short-term mortality has been established, the literature is contradictory regarding its influence on long-term, cancer-specific survival. The present investigation assessed the long-term survival of 584 patients with stage I–III rectal cancer.

Methods

The 10-year overall survival and cancer-specific survival were analyzed in 584 patients from a single tertiary center. All patients had undergone curative rectal cancer resection between 1991 and 2010. Patients with and without AL were compared using both a multivariate Cox hazards model and propensity score analysis.

Results

A total of 64 patients developed AL (11.0 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 8.7 to 13.8 %). The median follow-up was 5.2 years for all patients; and 7.4 years for patients still alive at the end of the investigated period. AL did persistently not impair cancer-specific survival based on unadjusted Cox regression (hazard ratio of death (HR) = 1.27, 95 % CI = 0.65 to 2.48, P = 0.489); risk-adjusted Cox regression (HR = 1.10, 95 % CI = 0.54 to 2.20, P = 0.799); and propensity score matching (HR = 1.18, 95 % CI = 0.57 to 2.43, P = 0.660).

Conclusions

Based on the present propensity score analysis, the oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing curative rectal cancer resections were not impaired by the development of anastomotic leakage.
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference Reshef A, Lavery I, Kiran RP (2012) Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only? Dis Colon Rectum 55(1):51–58. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182351c1f CrossRefPubMed Reshef A, Lavery I, Kiran RP (2012) Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only? Dis Colon Rectum 55(1):51–58. doi:10.​1097/​DCR.​0b013e3182351c1f​ CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ (1994) Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 81(8):1224–1226CrossRefPubMed Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ (1994) Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 81(8):1224–1226CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Snijders HS, Wouters MW, van Leersum NJ, Kolfschoten NE, Henneman D, de Vries AC, Tollenaar RA, Bonsing BA (2012) Meta-analysis of the risk for anastomotic leakage, the postoperative mortality caused by leakage in relation to the overall postoperative mortality. Eur J Surg Oncol 38(11):1013–1019. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2012.07.111 CrossRefPubMed Snijders HS, Wouters MW, van Leersum NJ, Kolfschoten NE, Henneman D, de Vries AC, Tollenaar RA, Bonsing BA (2012) Meta-analysis of the risk for anastomotic leakage, the postoperative mortality caused by leakage in relation to the overall postoperative mortality. Eur J Surg Oncol 38(11):1013–1019. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejso.​2012.​07.​111 CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference den Dulk M, Marijnen CA, Collette L, Putter H, Pahlman L, Folkesson J, Bosset JF, Rodel C, Bujko K, van de Velde CJ (2009) Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 96(9):1066–1075. doi:10.1002/bjs.6694 CrossRef den Dulk M, Marijnen CA, Collette L, Putter H, Pahlman L, Folkesson J, Bosset JF, Rodel C, Bujko K, van de Velde CJ (2009) Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 96(9):1066–1075. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​6694 CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P (2011) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253(5):890–899. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182128929 CrossRefPubMed Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P (2011) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253(5):890–899. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3182128929​ CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Warschkow R, Steffen T, Thierbach J, Bruckner T, Lange J, Tarantino I (2011) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection and reconstruction with colorectostomy. A retrospective study with bootstrap analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 18(10):2772–2782. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1696-1 CrossRefPubMed Warschkow R, Steffen T, Thierbach J, Bruckner T, Lange J, Tarantino I (2011) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection and reconstruction with colorectostomy. A retrospective study with bootstrap analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 18(10):2772–2782. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-011-1696-1 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, Martus P, Tschmelitsch J, Hager E, Hess CF, Karstens JH, Liersch T, Schmidberger H, Raab R (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351(17):1731–1740. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040694 CrossRefPubMed Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, Martus P, Tschmelitsch J, Hager E, Hess CF, Karstens JH, Liersch T, Schmidberger H, Raab R (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351(17):1731–1740. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa040694 CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, Jessup JM, Kemeny N, Macdonald JS, Somerfield MR, Hayes DF, Bast RC Jr (2006) ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(33):5313–5327. doi:10.1200/jco.2006.08.2644 CrossRefPubMed Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, Jessup JM, Kemeny N, Macdonald JS, Somerfield MR, Hayes DF, Bast RC Jr (2006) ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(33):5313–5327. doi:10.​1200/​jco.​2006.​08.​2644 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Joffe MM, Rosenbaum PR (1999) Invited commentary: propensity scores. Am J Epidemiol 150(4):327–333CrossRefPubMed Joffe MM, Rosenbaum PR (1999) Invited commentary: propensity scores. Am J Epidemiol 150(4):327–333CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rubin DB (1997) Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med 127(8 Pt 2):757–763CrossRefPubMed Rubin DB (1997) Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med 127(8 Pt 2):757–763CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hansen BB, Klopfer SO (2006) Optimal full matching and related designs via network flows. J Comput Graph Stat 15:609–627CrossRef Hansen BB, Klopfer SO (2006) Optimal full matching and related designs via network flows. J Comput Graph Stat 15:609–627CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sekhon JS (2011) Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: the matching package for R. J Stat Softw 42:1–52CrossRef Sekhon JS (2011) Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: the matching package for R. J Stat Softw 42:1–52CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Warschkow R, Guller U, Koberle D, Muller SA, Steffen T, Thurnheer M, Schmied BM, Tarantino I (2014) Perioperative blood transfusions do not impact overall and disease-free survival after curative rectal cancer resection: a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg 259(1):131–138. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318287ab4d CrossRefPubMed Warschkow R, Guller U, Koberle D, Muller SA, Steffen T, Thurnheer M, Schmied BM, Tarantino I (2014) Perioperative blood transfusions do not impact overall and disease-free survival after curative rectal cancer resection: a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg 259(1):131–138. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e318287ab4d​ CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Smith JD, Butte JM, Weiser MR, D’Angelica MI, Paty PB, Temple LK, Guillem JG, Jarnagin WR, Nash GM (2013) Anastomotic leak following low anterior resection in stage IV rectal cancer is associated with poor survival. Ann Surg Oncol 20(8):2641–2646. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2854-9 CrossRefPubMed Smith JD, Butte JM, Weiser MR, D’Angelica MI, Paty PB, Temple LK, Guillem JG, Jarnagin WR, Nash GM (2013) Anastomotic leak following low anterior resection in stage IV rectal cancer is associated with poor survival. Ann Surg Oncol 20(8):2641–2646. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-012-2854-9 CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
go back to reference Gong JP, Yang L, Huang XE, Sun BC, Zhou JN, Yu DS, Zhou X, Li DZ, Guan X, Wang DF (2014) Outcomes based on risk assessment of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15(2):707–712CrossRefPubMed Gong JP, Yang L, Huang XE, Sun BC, Zhou JN, Yu DS, Zhou X, Li DZ, Guan X, Wang DF (2014) Outcomes based on risk assessment of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15(2):707–712CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kulu Y, Tarantio I, Warschkow R, Kny S, Schneider M, Schmied BM, Buchler MW, Ulrich A (2015) Anastomotic leakage is associated with impaired overall and disease-free survival after curative rectal cancer resection: a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 22(6):2059–2067. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-4187-3 CrossRefPubMed Kulu Y, Tarantio I, Warschkow R, Kny S, Schneider M, Schmied BM, Buchler MW, Ulrich A (2015) Anastomotic leakage is associated with impaired overall and disease-free survival after curative rectal cancer resection: a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 22(6):2059–2067. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-014-4187-3 CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Couture J, O’Callaghan C, Myint AS, Bessell E, Thompson LC, Parmar M, Stephens RJ, Sebag-Montefiore D (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373(9666):821–828. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60485-2 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Couture J, O’Callaghan C, Myint AS, Bessell E, Thompson LC, Parmar M, Stephens RJ, Sebag-Montefiore D (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373(9666):821–828. doi:10.​1016/​s0140-6736(09)60485-2 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Dik VK, Aarts MJ, Van Grevenstein WM, Koopman M, Van Oijen MG, Lemmens VE, Siersema PD (2014) Association between socioeconomic status, surgical treatment and mortality in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 101(9):1173–1182. doi:10.1002/bjs.9555 CrossRefPubMed Dik VK, Aarts MJ, Van Grevenstein WM, Koopman M, Van Oijen MG, Lemmens VE, Siersema PD (2014) Association between socioeconomic status, surgical treatment and mortality in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 101(9):1173–1182. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​9555 CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Sturmer T, Joshi M, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Rothman KJ, Schneeweiss S (2006) A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods. J Clin Epidemiol 59(5):437–447. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.004 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Sturmer T, Joshi M, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Rothman KJ, Schneeweiss S (2006) A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods. J Clin Epidemiol 59(5):437–447. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jclinepi.​2005.​07.​004 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Singh PP, Zeng IS, Srinivasa S, Lemanu DP, Connolly AB, Hill AG (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of use of serum C-reactive protein levels to predict anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 101(4):339–346. doi:10.1002/bjs.9354 CrossRefPubMed Singh PP, Zeng IS, Srinivasa S, Lemanu DP, Connolly AB, Hill AG (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of use of serum C-reactive protein levels to predict anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 101(4):339–346. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​9354 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Anastomotic leakage after curative rectal cancer resection has no impact on long-term survival: a propensity score analysis
Authors
Sabrina M. Ebinger
René Warschkow
Ignazio Tarantino
Bruno M. Schmied
Lukas Marti
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 12/2015
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2331-6

Other articles of this Issue 12/2015

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 12/2015 Go to the issue