Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 8/2014

01-08-2014 | Original Article

Patient-reported recovery after enhanced colorectal cancer surgery: a longitudinal six-month follow-up study

Authors: Jenny Jakobsson, Ewa Idvall, Christine Wann-Hansson

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a modern regime of care, and numerous studies have proved its beneficial impact on recovery after colorectal surgery. However, little is known about patients’ continuing recovery after discharge. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to describe patient-reported recovery after colorectal cancer surgery in the context of ERAS from the day of discharge until 1 and 6 months after surgery.

Method

Assessments were made at discharge, at 1 month and at 6 months after surgery using the questionnaire Postoperative Recovery Profile (PRP). In all, 119 patients recovering from abdominoperineal resection, rectal resection, or colonic resection completed all three assessments.

Results

The global score of recovery showed that no patient experienced being fully recovered at discharge. After rectal resection, patients frequently reported being not at all recovered. One month after surgery, patients recovering from colonic resection reported significant improvements regarding 11 of 17 questionnaire items, whereas abdominoperineal resection patients reported no significant improvements regarding any item. Instead, significantly higher levels of problems were reported in the items fatigue, muscle weakness and feeling down. Rectal resection patients reported significant improvements between 1 and 6 months after surgery regarding 7 of 19 items. However, the item gastrointestinal function distinguished, as patients reported significant deterioration towards higher levels of problems 6 months after surgery.

Conclusion

This study elucidates the difference between groups of colorectal patients and the diverse patterns of their recovery, implying different needs in terms of prolonged support after discharge.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lassen K, Soap M, Nygren J, Cox BW, Hendry PO, Spies C, Dejong CHC (2011) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 144:961–969CrossRef Lassen K, Soap M, Nygren J, Cox BW, Hendry PO, Spies C, Dejong CHC (2011) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 144:961–969CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Allvin R, Berg K, Idvall E, Nilsson U (2007) Postoperative recovery: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 57:552–558PubMedCrossRef Allvin R, Berg K, Idvall E, Nilsson U (2007) Postoperative recovery: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 57:552–558PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hendry PO, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Dejong CH, Ljungqvist O, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Study Group (2009) Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 96:197–205. doi:10.1002/bjs.6445 PubMedCrossRef Hendry PO, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Dejong CH, Ljungqvist O, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Study Group (2009) Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 96:197–205. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​6445 PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Smith JJ, Lee J, Burke C, Contractor KB, Dawson PM (2002) Major colorectal cancer resection should not be denied to the elderly. Eur J Surg Oncol 28:661–666PubMedCrossRef Smith JJ, Lee J, Burke C, Contractor KB, Dawson PM (2002) Major colorectal cancer resection should not be denied to the elderly. Eur J Surg Oncol 28:661–666PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schwenk W, Neudecker J, Raue W, Haase O, Muller JM (2006) “Fast track” rehabilitation after rectal cancer resection. Int J Color Dis 21(6):547–553CrossRef Schwenk W, Neudecker J, Raue W, Haase O, Muller JM (2006) “Fast track” rehabilitation after rectal cancer resection. Int J Color Dis 21(6):547–553CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fearon KC, Luff R (2003) The nutritional management of surgical patients: enhanced recovery after surgery. Proc Nutr Soc 62:807–811PubMedCrossRef Fearon KC, Luff R (2003) The nutritional management of surgical patients: enhanced recovery after surgery. Proc Nutr Soc 62:807–811PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Basse L, Raskov HH, Hjort Jakobsen D, Sonne E, Billesbolle P, Hendel H et al (2002) Accelerated postoperative recovery program after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition. Br J Surg 89:446–453PubMedCrossRef Basse L, Raskov HH, Hjort Jakobsen D, Sonne E, Billesbolle P, Hendel H et al (2002) Accelerated postoperative recovery program after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition. Br J Surg 89:446–453PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Aasa A, Hovbäck M, Berterö CM (2013) The importance of preoperative information for patient participation in colorectal surgery care. J Clin Nurs 22:1604–1612PubMedCrossRef Aasa A, Hovbäck M, Berterö CM (2013) The importance of preoperative information for patient participation in colorectal surgery care. J Clin Nurs 22:1604–1612PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Taylor C, Burch J (2011) Feedback on an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal surgery. Br J Nurs 20:286–290PubMedCrossRef Taylor C, Burch J (2011) Feedback on an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal surgery. Br J Nurs 20:286–290PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lithner M, Johansson J, Andersson E, Jakobsson U, Palmquist I, Klefsgard R (2012) Perceived information after surgery for colorectal cancer—an explorative study. Color Dis 14:1340–1350CrossRef Lithner M, Johansson J, Andersson E, Jakobsson U, Palmquist I, Klefsgard R (2012) Perceived information after surgery for colorectal cancer—an explorative study. Color Dis 14:1340–1350CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Norlyk A, Harder I (2011) Recovering at home: participating in a fast-track colon cancer surgery programme. Nurs Inq 18:165–173PubMedCrossRef Norlyk A, Harder I (2011) Recovering at home: participating in a fast-track colon cancer surgery programme. Nurs Inq 18:165–173PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Blazeby JM, Soulsby M, Winstone K, King PM, Bulley S, Kennady RH (2009) A qualitative evaluation of patients’ experiences of an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal cancer. Color Dis 12:e236–e242CrossRef Blazeby JM, Soulsby M, Winstone K, King PM, Bulley S, Kennady RH (2009) A qualitative evaluation of patients’ experiences of an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal cancer. Color Dis 12:e236–e242CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Burch J (2012) Enhanced recovery and nurse-led telephone follow-up post surgery. Br J Nurs 21:24–29CrossRef Burch J (2012) Enhanced recovery and nurse-led telephone follow-up post surgery. Br J Nurs 21:24–29CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wennström B, Warrén Stomberg M, Modin M, Skullman S (2010) Patient symptoms after colonic surgery in the era of enhanced recovery—a long-term follow-up. J Clin Nurs 19:666–672PubMedCrossRef Wennström B, Warrén Stomberg M, Modin M, Skullman S (2010) Patient symptoms after colonic surgery in the era of enhanced recovery—a long-term follow-up. J Clin Nurs 19:666–672PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Allvin R, Ehnfors M, Rawal N, Svensson E, Idvall E (2009) Development of a questionnaire to measure patient-reported postoperative recovery: content validity and intra-patient reliability. J Eval Clin Pract 15:411–419PubMedCrossRef Allvin R, Ehnfors M, Rawal N, Svensson E, Idvall E (2009) Development of a questionnaire to measure patient-reported postoperative recovery: content validity and intra-patient reliability. J Eval Clin Pract 15:411–419PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Allvin R, Svensson E, Rawal N, Ehnfors M, Kling AM, Idvall E (2011) The Postoperative Recovery Profile (PRP)—a multidimensional questionnaire for evaluation of recovery profiles. J Eval Clin Pract 17:236–243PubMedCrossRef Allvin R, Svensson E, Rawal N, Ehnfors M, Kling AM, Idvall E (2011) The Postoperative Recovery Profile (PRP)—a multidimensional questionnaire for evaluation of recovery profiles. J Eval Clin Pract 17:236–243PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Svensson E (1998) Ordinal invariant measures for individual and group changes in ordered categorical data. Stat Med 17:2923–2936PubMedCrossRef Svensson E (1998) Ordinal invariant measures for individual and group changes in ordered categorical data. Stat Med 17:2923–2936PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Field A (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications Ltd, London Field A (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications Ltd, London
23.
go back to reference Fingren J, Lindholm E, Carlsson E (2013) Perceptions of phantom rectum syndrome and health-related quality of life in patients following abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs 40:280–286CrossRef Fingren J, Lindholm E, Carlsson E (2013) Perceptions of phantom rectum syndrome and health-related quality of life in patients following abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs 40:280–286CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ovesen P, Kroner K, Ornsholt J, Bach K (1991) Phantom-related phenomena after rectal amputation: prevalence and clinical characteristics. Pain 44:289–291PubMedCrossRef Ovesen P, Kroner K, Ornsholt J, Bach K (1991) Phantom-related phenomena after rectal amputation: prevalence and clinical characteristics. Pain 44:289–291PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Desnoo L, Faithfull S (2006) A qualitative study of anterior resection syndrome: the experiences of cancer survivors who have undergone resection surgery. Eur J Cancer Care 15:244–251CrossRef Desnoo L, Faithfull S (2006) A qualitative study of anterior resection syndrome: the experiences of cancer survivors who have undergone resection surgery. Eur J Cancer Care 15:244–251CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Karanjia N, Schache D, Heald R (1992) Function of the distal rectum after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Br J Surg 79:114–116PubMedCrossRef Karanjia N, Schache D, Heald R (1992) Function of the distal rectum after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Br J Surg 79:114–116PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S (2013) Impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:1377–1387PubMedCrossRef Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S (2013) Impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:1377–1387PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Siassi M, Hohenberger W, Losel F, Weiss M (2008) Quality of life and patient’s expectations after closure of a temporary stoma. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1207–1212PubMedCrossRef Siassi M, Hohenberger W, Losel F, Weiss M (2008) Quality of life and patient’s expectations after closure of a temporary stoma. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1207–1212PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference O’Leary DP, Fide CJ, Foy C, Lucarotti ME (2001) Quality of life after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and temporary loop ileostomy for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 88:1216–1220PubMedCrossRef O’Leary DP, Fide CJ, Foy C, Lucarotti ME (2001) Quality of life after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and temporary loop ileostomy for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 88:1216–1220PubMedCrossRef
30.
31.
go back to reference Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S (2000) Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth 84:11–15PubMedCrossRef Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S (2000) Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth 84:11–15PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient-reported recovery after enhanced colorectal cancer surgery: a longitudinal six-month follow-up study
Authors
Jenny Jakobsson
Ewa Idvall
Christine Wann-Hansson
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1939-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 8/2014 Go to the issue