Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 8/2014

Open Access 01-08-2014 | Original Article

Colorectal cancer surgery remains effective with rising patient age

Authors: Ulrich Nitsche, Christoph Späth, Tara C. Müller, Matthias Maak, Klaus-Peter Janssen, Dirk Wilhelm, Jörg Kleeff, Franz G. Bader

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The incidence of colorectal cancer rises disproportionally in aging persons. With a shift towards higher population age in general, an increasing number of older patients require adequate treatment. This study aims to investigate differences between young and elderly patients who undergo resection for colorectal cancer, regarding clinical characteristics, morbidity, and prognosis.

Methods

By retrospective analysis of 6 years (2007 to 2012) of a prospectively documented database, a total of 636 patients were identified who underwent oncological resection for colorectal cancer at our institution. Of this total, all 569 patients with primary colorectal adenocarcinoma were included. Four hundred ten patients were 74 years or younger and 159 were 75 years or older. The median follow-up was 22 months.

Results

Older patients had significantly more comorbidities (85 % vs. 56 %, p < 0.001) and a higher ASA score (p < 0.001). The mean length of stay in the hospital was longer (24 vs. 20 days, p = 0.002), as was the length of postoperative intensive care stay (4 vs. 2 days, p = 0.003). However, elderly patients did not have significantly higher rates of intraoperative complications or surgical morbidity. Tumor-specific 2-year survival was 83 ± 4 % for the elderly and 87 ± 2 % for the younger patients, which was not significantly different (p = 0.90).

Conclusions

Long-term outcome after oncologic resection for colorectal cancer does not differ between elderly and younger patients. Age in general should not be considered as a limiting factor for colorectal cancer surgery or tumor-specific prognosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Grone J, Kreis ME (2013) Personalized treatment of colorectal cancer in old age. Chirurg Zeitschr Gebiete Operativen Med 84(4):305–309CrossRef Grone J, Kreis ME (2013) Personalized treatment of colorectal cancer in old age. Chirurg Zeitschr Gebiete Operativen Med 84(4):305–309CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cheema FN, Abraham NS, Berger DH, Albo D, Taffet GE, Naik AD (2011) Novel approaches to perioperative assessment and intervention may improve long-term outcomes after colorectal cancer resection in older adults. Ann Surg 253(5):867–874PubMedCrossRef Cheema FN, Abraham NS, Berger DH, Albo D, Taffet GE, Naik AD (2011) Novel approaches to perioperative assessment and intervention may improve long-term outcomes after colorectal cancer resection in older adults. Ann Surg 253(5):867–874PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kruschewski M, Germer CT, Rieger H, Buhr HJ (2002) Radical resection of colorectal carcinoma in the oldest old. Chirurg Zeitschr Gebiete Operativen Med 73(3):241–244CrossRef Kruschewski M, Germer CT, Rieger H, Buhr HJ (2002) Radical resection of colorectal carcinoma in the oldest old. Chirurg Zeitschr Gebiete Operativen Med 73(3):241–244CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Yancik R, Ries LA (1994) Cancer in older persons. Magnitude of the problem—how do we apply what we know? Cancer 74(7 Suppl):1995–2003PubMedCrossRef Yancik R, Ries LA (1994) Cancer in older persons. Magnitude of the problem—how do we apply what we know? Cancer 74(7 Suppl):1995–2003PubMedCrossRef
6.
8.
go back to reference Poston GJ, Tait D, O'Connell S, Bennett A, Berendse S (2011) Diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 343:d6751PubMedCrossRef Poston GJ, Tait D, O'Connell S, Bennett A, Berendse S (2011) Diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 343:d6751PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ananda S, Field KM, Kosmider S et al (2008) Patient age and comorbidity are major determinants of adjuvant chemotherapy use for stage III colon cancer in routine clinical practice. J Clin Oncol 26(27):4516–4517, author reply 4517–4518PubMedCrossRef Ananda S, Field KM, Kosmider S et al (2008) Patient age and comorbidity are major determinants of adjuvant chemotherapy use for stage III colon cancer in routine clinical practice. J Clin Oncol 26(27):4516–4517, author reply 4517–4518PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group (2000) Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. Lancet 356(9234):968–974CrossRef Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group (2000) Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. Lancet 356(9234):968–974CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yancik R, Wesley MN, Ries LA et al (1998) Comorbidity and age as predictors of risk for early mortality of male and female colon carcinoma patients: a population-based study. Cancer 82(11):2123–2134PubMedCrossRef Yancik R, Wesley MN, Ries LA et al (1998) Comorbidity and age as predictors of risk for early mortality of male and female colon carcinoma patients: a population-based study. Cancer 82(11):2123–2134PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference O'Connor ES, Greenblatt DY, LoConte NK et al (2011) Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer with poor prognostic features. J Clin Oncol 29(25):3381–3388PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef O'Connor ES, Greenblatt DY, LoConte NK et al (2011) Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer with poor prognostic features. J Clin Oncol 29(25):3381–3388PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chou CL, Chang SC, Lin TC et al (2011) Differences in clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer between younger and elderly patients: an analysis of 322 patients from a single institution. Am J Surg 202(5):574–582PubMedCrossRef Chou CL, Chang SC, Lin TC et al (2011) Differences in clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer between younger and elderly patients: an analysis of 322 patients from a single institution. Am J Surg 202(5):574–582PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Saville DJ (1990) Multiple comparison procedures — the practical solution. Am Stat 44(2):174–180 Saville DJ (1990) Multiple comparison procedures — the practical solution. Am Stat 44(2):174–180
15.
go back to reference Clark AJ, Stockton D, Elder A, Wilson RG, Dunlop MG (2004) Assessment of outcomes after colorectal cancer resection in the elderly as a rationale for screening and early detection. Br J Surg 91(10):1345–1351PubMedCrossRef Clark AJ, Stockton D, Elder A, Wilson RG, Dunlop MG (2004) Assessment of outcomes after colorectal cancer resection in the elderly as a rationale for screening and early detection. Br J Surg 91(10):1345–1351PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nitsche U, Rosenberg R, Balmert A et al (2012) Integrative marker analysis allows risk assessment for metastasis in stage II colon cancer. Ann Surg 256(5):763–771, discussion 771PubMedCrossRef Nitsche U, Rosenberg R, Balmert A et al (2012) Integrative marker analysis allows risk assessment for metastasis in stage II colon cancer. Ann Surg 256(5):763–771, discussion 771PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Boland CR, Goel A (2010) Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 138(6):2073.e3–2087.e3CrossRef Boland CR, Goel A (2010) Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 138(6):2073.e3–2087.e3CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nitsche U, Zimmermann A, Spath C et al (2013) Mucinous and signet-ring cell colorectal cancers differ from classical adenocarcinomas in tumor biology and prognosis. Ann Surg 258(5):775–782PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Nitsche U, Zimmermann A, Spath C et al (2013) Mucinous and signet-ring cell colorectal cancers differ from classical adenocarcinomas in tumor biology and prognosis. Ann Surg 258(5):775–782PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Colorectal cancer surgery remains effective with rising patient age
Authors
Ulrich Nitsche
Christoph Späth
Tara C. Müller
Matthias Maak
Klaus-Peter Janssen
Dirk Wilhelm
Jörg Kleeff
Franz G. Bader
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1914-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 8/2014 Go to the issue