Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 4/2014

01-04-2014 | Original Article

Documented quality of care in certified colorectal cancer centers in Germany: German Cancer Society benchmarking report for 2013

Authors: S. Wesselmann, A. Winter, J. Ferencz, T. Seufferlein, S. Post

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In order to improve the quality of treatment for cancer patients the German Cancer Society (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft) implemented a certification system for oncological care institutions. The certified colorectal cancer centers present the structures, processes and results of their network in the framework of an auditing procedure.

Methods

The current benchmarking report by the certified centers reflects the centers’ reference results over a period of 3 years. The figures included in the benchmarking report reflect the areas of interdisciplinary collaboration, guideline-compliant treatment, and expertise of the main treatment partners.

Results

High percentages were shown for indicators reflecting pretreatment and postoperative case presentations in multidisciplinary team meetings (91.8 % or 98.1 %), psycho-oncologic care (54.8 %) as well as social service counseling (77.1 %). Good quality of the TME rectal specimen and adequate lymph-node retrieval (12 lymph nodes at least) was achieved by 93 % or 96.6 % of the centers. Adjuvant chemotherapy (colon, Union for International Cancer Control [UICC] stage III) or neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (rectum, UICC stages II and III) received 73.7 % or 80 % of relevant patients. Quotas of anastomotic leakage in the colon or rectum were 4.4 % or 7.6 %, whereas postoperative mortality amounted to 2.6 %.

Conclusions

The present analysis of the results, together with the centers’ statements and the auditors’ reports, shows that most of the targets for indicator figures are being better met over the course of time. In addition, however, there is a clear potential for improvement and the centers are verifiably addressing this. A transparent presentation of the quality of care and reflection on and discussion of the results among the treatment partners in the certified network and with the auditors during the certification process may contribute to constant quality improvement in oncological care.
Literature
7.
go back to reference Follmann M, Wesselmann S, Kopp I, Nothacker M Developing guidelines and quality indicators simultaneously: effects on guideline content and implications on the guideline development process. G-I-N Conference 2013 Follmann M, Wesselmann S, Kopp I, Nothacker M Developing guidelines and quality indicators simultaneously: effects on guideline content and implications on the guideline development process. G-I-N Conference 2013
8.
go back to reference Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, Marshall M (2002) Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care 11:358–364PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, Marshall M (2002) Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care 11:358–364PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Merkel S, Klossek D, Göhl J, Papadopoulos T, Hohenberger W, Hermanek P (2009) Quality management in rectal carcinoma: what is feasible. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(8):931–942PubMedCrossRef Merkel S, Klossek D, Göhl J, Papadopoulos T, Hohenberger W, Hermanek P (2009) Quality management in rectal carcinoma: what is feasible. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(8):931–942PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schwarzbach M, Hasenberg T, Linke M, Kienle P, Post S, Ronellenfitsch U (2011) Perioperative. quality of care is modulated by process management with clinical pathways for fast-track surgery of the colon. What is feasible. Int J Colorectal Dis 26(12):1567–1575PubMedCrossRef Schwarzbach M, Hasenberg T, Linke M, Kienle P, Post S, Ronellenfitsch U (2011) Perioperative. quality of care is modulated by process management with clinical pathways for fast-track surgery of the colon. What is feasible. Int J Colorectal Dis 26(12):1567–1575PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hohenberger W, Merkel S, Hermanek P (2013) Volume and outcome in rectal cancer surgery: the importance of quality management. Int J Colorectal Dis 28(2):197–206PubMedCrossRef Hohenberger W, Merkel S, Hermanek P (2013) Volume and outcome in rectal cancer surgery: the importance of quality management. Int J Colorectal Dis 28(2):197–206PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Documented quality of care in certified colorectal cancer centers in Germany: German Cancer Society benchmarking report for 2013
Authors
S. Wesselmann
A. Winter
J. Ferencz
T. Seufferlein
S. Post
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1842-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 4/2014 Go to the issue