Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2/2011

01-02-2011 | Original Article

Long-term success of colonic stent insertion is influenced by indication but not by length of stent or site of obstruction

Authors: Christian P. Selinger, Jayapal Ramesh, Derrick F. Martin

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Stent insertion plays an important part in the management of acute colonic obstruction. There are limited data on factors influencing short- and long-term success.

Aims and methods

We investigated indications, technical and clinical success rates, complication rates and the factors influencing them. Patients were identified from our prospective colonic stent database (2000–2008).

Results

One hundred and four stents were attempted in 96 patients (technical success rate, 83.3%). Clinical short-term success was observed in 74 (77.1%) patients. Follow-up data available for 57 patients showed clinical long-term success in 77% (44/57). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed a significant decline in technical success over the study period (p = 0.041). Patients with colonic malignancy had significantly higher long-term success rates (81%), compared to those with extra-colonic malignancies (43%) (p = 0.049). Length of stent and site of obstruction were not significant factors. Early complications occurred in 10%, and late complications, in 26.3% of cases.

Conclusion

Colonic stent insertion provides symptom relief in over 70% when used as a long-term solution. Complication rates are high, and a significant minority of patients requires re-intervention. Obstruction caused by extra-colonic malignancy is far less likely to be permanently palliated by a stent, in comparison to colonic malignancy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Deans GT, Krukowski ZH, Irwin ST (1994) Malignant obstruction of the left colon. Br J Surg 81:1270–1276CrossRefPubMed Deans GT, Krukowski ZH, Irwin ST (1994) Malignant obstruction of the left colon. Br J Surg 81:1270–1276CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Keraenen I, Lepistoe A, Udd M et al (2010) Outcome of patients after endoluminal stent placement for benign colorectal obstruction. Scand J Gastroenterol 45(6):725–31CrossRef Keraenen I, Lepistoe A, Udd M et al (2010) Outcome of patients after endoluminal stent placement for benign colorectal obstruction. Scand J Gastroenterol 45(6):725–31CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Binkert CA, Lederman H, Jost R et al (1998) Acute colonic obstruction: clinical aspects and cost-effectiveness of pre-operative and palliative treatment with self-expanding metal stents–a preliminary report. Radiol 206:199–204 Binkert CA, Lederman H, Jost R et al (1998) Acute colonic obstruction: clinical aspects and cost-effectiveness of pre-operative and palliative treatment with self-expanding metal stents–a preliminary report. Radiol 206:199–204
4.
go back to reference Martinez-Santos C, Lobato RF, Fradeja JM et al (2002) Self-expandable metal stents before elective surgery vs. emergency surgery for the treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction: comparison of primary anastomosis and morbidity rate. Dis Colon Rectum 45:401–406CrossRefPubMed Martinez-Santos C, Lobato RF, Fradeja JM et al (2002) Self-expandable metal stents before elective surgery vs. emergency surgery for the treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction: comparison of primary anastomosis and morbidity rate. Dis Colon Rectum 45:401–406CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Van Hooft JE, Marinelli AW, Bossuyt PM et al (2006) Premature closure of Dutch stent-in 1 study. Lancet 368:1573–1574CrossRefPubMed Van Hooft JE, Marinelli AW, Bossuyt PM et al (2006) Premature closure of Dutch stent-in 1 study. Lancet 368:1573–1574CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Baraza W, Lee F, Brown S et al (2008) Combination of endo-radiological colorectal stenting: a prospective 5-year clinical evaluation. Colorectal Dis 10:901–906PubMed Baraza W, Lee F, Brown S et al (2008) Combination of endo-radiological colorectal stenting: a prospective 5-year clinical evaluation. Colorectal Dis 10:901–906PubMed
7.
go back to reference Fregonese D, Naspetti R, Ferrer S et al (2008) Ultraflex precision colonic stent placement as a bridge to surgery in patients with colon obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 67:68–73CrossRefPubMed Fregonese D, Naspetti R, Ferrer S et al (2008) Ultraflex precision colonic stent placement as a bridge to surgery in patients with colon obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 67:68–73CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Repici A, De Caro G, Lugiano C et al (2008) WallFlex colonic stent placement for management of malignant colonic obstruction: a prospective study at two centers. Gastrointest Endosc 67:77–84CrossRefPubMed Repici A, De Caro G, Lugiano C et al (2008) WallFlex colonic stent placement for management of malignant colonic obstruction: a prospective study at two centers. Gastrointest Endosc 67:77–84CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Baron TH, Kozarek RA (2004) Endoscopic stenting of colonic tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18:209–229CrossRefPubMed Baron TH, Kozarek RA (2004) Endoscopic stenting of colonic tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18:209–229CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Jung MK, Park SY, Jeon SW et al (2009) Factors associated with the long-term outcome of a self-expandable colon stent used for palliation of malignant colorectal obstruction. Surg Endosc 24:525–30CrossRefPubMed Jung MK, Park SY, Jeon SW et al (2009) Factors associated with the long-term outcome of a self-expandable colon stent used for palliation of malignant colorectal obstruction. Surg Endosc 24:525–30CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Keswani RN, Aza RR, Edmundowicz SA et al (2009) Stenting for malignant colonic obstruction: a comparison of efficacy and complications in colonic versus extracolonic malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc 69:675–680CrossRefPubMed Keswani RN, Aza RR, Edmundowicz SA et al (2009) Stenting for malignant colonic obstruction: a comparison of efficacy and complications in colonic versus extracolonic malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc 69:675–680CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Long-term success of colonic stent insertion is influenced by indication but not by length of stent or site of obstruction
Authors
Christian P. Selinger
Jayapal Ramesh
Derrick F. Martin
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1111-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2/2011 Go to the issue