Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2/2011

01-02-2011 | Original Article

Impact of FDG PET/CT in the staging and the follow-up of anal carcinoma

Authors: Laetitia Vercellino, Françoise Montravers, Vincent de Parades, Virginie Huchet, Khaldoun Kerrou, Pierre Bauer, Emmanuel Touboul, Jean-Noël Talbot

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to assess the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and fluorodeoxyglucose (18F) (FDG PET/CT) for the staging and the follow-up of anal carcinoma, and to evaluate the impact of FDG PET/CT on patient management.

Materials and methods

Patients with anal carcinoma were referred to our department from October 2004 until July 2008. The diagnostic performance was evaluated on a per-examination basis and on a per-site basis, together with impact of PET/CT on patient management. The standard of truth was histology when available and, in all cases, follow-up data during at least 6 months.

Results

Fifty-eight FDG PET/CT performed in 44 patients were analysed—22 for initial staging and 36 during follow-up. The detection rate of non-excised tumours on initial examination was 93%. During post-treatment follow-up, FDG PET/CT had, on a per-examination basis, sensitivity for the detection of persistent or recurrent disease of 93% and specificity of 81%, and on a per-site basis, 86% and 97%, respectively. Its negative predictive value was 94% on a per-examination basis and 98% on a per-site basis. FDG PET/CT had an impact on management in nine patients out of 44 (20%), which was relevant in eight of them (89%).

Conclusion

FDG PET/CT is an accurate imaging modality in anal cancer. It has an interesting added value during post-treatment follow-up, especially when persistence or recurrence of disease is suspected. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether surveillance by means of FDG PET/CT might have a positive impact on overall survival.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al (2008) Cancer statistics, 2008 CA. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 58:71–96CrossRef Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al (2008) Cancer statistics, 2008 CA. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 58:71–96CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Johnson LG, Madeleine MM, Newcomer LM et al (2004) Anal cancer incidence and survival: the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results experience, 1973–2000. Cancer 101:281–288CrossRefPubMed Johnson LG, Madeleine MM, Newcomer LM et al (2004) Anal cancer incidence and survival: the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results experience, 1973–2000. Cancer 101:281–288CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Welton ML, Sharkey FE, Kahlenberg MS (2004) The etiology and epidemiology of anal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 13:263–275CrossRefPubMed Welton ML, Sharkey FE, Kahlenberg MS (2004) The etiology and epidemiology of anal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 13:263–275CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Fleshner PR, Chalasani S, Chang GJ et al (2008) Practice parameters for anal squamous neoplasms. Dis Colon Rectum 51:2–9CrossRefPubMed Fleshner PR, Chalasani S, Chang GJ et al (2008) Practice parameters for anal squamous neoplasms. Dis Colon Rectum 51:2–9CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Goldman S, Norming U, Svensson C et al (1991) Transanorectal ultrasonography in the staging of anal epidermoid carcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis 6:152–157CrossRefPubMed Goldman S, Norming U, Svensson C et al (1991) Transanorectal ultrasonography in the staging of anal epidermoid carcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis 6:152–157CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Scherrer A, Reboul F, Martin D et al (1990) CT of malignant anal canal tumors. Radiographics 10:433–453PubMed Scherrer A, Reboul F, Martin D et al (1990) CT of malignant anal canal tumors. Radiographics 10:433–453PubMed
7.
go back to reference Roach SC, Hulse PA, Moulding FJ et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of anal cancer. Clin Radiol 60:1111–1119CrossRefPubMed Roach SC, Hulse PA, Moulding FJ et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of anal cancer. Clin Radiol 60:1111–1119CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Damin DC, Rosito MA, Gus P et al (2003) Sentinel lymph node procedure in patients with epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal: early experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1032–1037CrossRefPubMed Damin DC, Rosito MA, Gus P et al (2003) Sentinel lymph node procedure in patients with epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal: early experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1032–1037CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Gérard JP, Chapet O, Samiei F et al (2001) Management of inguinal lymph node metastases in patients with carcinoma of the anal canal. Cancer 92:77–84CrossRefPubMed Gérard JP, Chapet O, Samiei F et al (2001) Management of inguinal lymph node metastases in patients with carcinoma of the anal canal. Cancer 92:77–84CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Das P, Bhatia S, Eng C et al (2007) Predictors and patterns of recurrence after definitive chemoradiation for anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:794–800CrossRefPubMed Das P, Bhatia S, Eng C et al (2007) Predictors and patterns of recurrence after definitive chemoradiation for anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:794–800CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ghouti L, Houvenaeghel G, Moutardier V et al (2005) Salvage abdominoperineal resection after failure of conservative treatment in anal epidermoid cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:16–22CrossRefPubMed Ghouti L, Houvenaeghel G, Moutardier V et al (2005) Salvage abdominoperineal resection after failure of conservative treatment in anal epidermoid cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48:16–22CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Christensen AF, Nielsen MB, Svendsen LB et al (2006) Three-dimensional anal endosonography may improve detection of recurrent anal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1527–1532CrossRefPubMed Christensen AF, Nielsen MB, Svendsen LB et al (2006) Three-dimensional anal endosonography may improve detection of recurrent anal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1527–1532CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Shankar LK, Hoffman JM, Bacharach S et al (2006) Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. J Nucl Med 47:1059–1066PubMed Shankar LK, Hoffman JM, Bacharach S et al (2006) Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. J Nucl Med 47:1059–1066PubMed
15.
go back to reference Trautmann TG, Zuger JH (2005) Positron emission tomography for pretreatment staging and posttreatment evaluation in cancer of the anal canal. Mol Imaging Biol 7:309–313CrossRefPubMed Trautmann TG, Zuger JH (2005) Positron emission tomography for pretreatment staging and posttreatment evaluation in cancer of the anal canal. Mol Imaging Biol 7:309–313CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Anderson C, Koshy M, Staley C et al (2007) PET-CT fusion in radiation management of patients with anorectal tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69:155–162CrossRefPubMed Anderson C, Koshy M, Staley C et al (2007) PET-CT fusion in radiation management of patients with anorectal tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69:155–162CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Cotter SE, Grigsby PW, Siegel BA et al (2006) FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of anal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65:720–725CrossRefPubMed Cotter SE, Grigsby PW, Siegel BA et al (2006) FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of anal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65:720–725CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Nguyen BT, Joon DL, Khoo V et al (2008) Assessing the impact of FDG-PET in the management of anal cancer. Radiother Oncol 87:376–382CrossRefPubMed Nguyen BT, Joon DL, Khoo V et al (2008) Assessing the impact of FDG-PET in the management of anal cancer. Radiother Oncol 87:376–382CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference de Winton E, Heriot AG, Ng M et al (2009) The impact of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on the staging, management and outcome of anal cancer. Br J Cancer 100:693–700CrossRefPubMed de Winton E, Heriot AG, Ng M et al (2009) The impact of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on the staging, management and outcome of anal cancer. Br J Cancer 100:693–700CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Schwarz JK, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F et al (2008) Tumor response and survival predicted by post-therapy FDG-PET/CT in anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71:180–186PubMed Schwarz JK, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F et al (2008) Tumor response and survival predicted by post-therapy FDG-PET/CT in anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71:180–186PubMed
21.
go back to reference Meta J, Seltzer M, Schiepers C et al (2001) Impact of 18F-FDG PET on managing patients with colorectal cancer: the referring physician's perspective. J Nucl Med 42:586–590PubMed Meta J, Seltzer M, Schiepers C et al (2001) Impact of 18F-FDG PET on managing patients with colorectal cancer: the referring physician's perspective. J Nucl Med 42:586–590PubMed
22.
go back to reference Mistrangelo M, Pelosi E, Bellò M et al (2010) Comparison of positron emission tomography scanning and sentinel node biopsy in the detection of inguinal node metastases in patients with anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77(1):73–78CrossRefPubMed Mistrangelo M, Pelosi E, Bellò M et al (2010) Comparison of positron emission tomography scanning and sentinel node biopsy in the detection of inguinal node metastases in patients with anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77(1):73–78CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference van Waarde A, Cobben DC, Suurmeijer AJ et al (2004) Selectivity of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG for differentiating tumor from inflammation in a rodent model. J Nucl Med 45:695–700PubMed van Waarde A, Cobben DC, Suurmeijer AJ et al (2004) Selectivity of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG for differentiating tumor from inflammation in a rodent model. J Nucl Med 45:695–700PubMed
24.
25.
go back to reference Mai SK, Welzel G, Hermann B et al (2009) Can the radiation dose to CT-enlarged but FDG-PET-negative inguinal lymph nodes in anal cancer be reduced? Strahlenther Onkol 185:254–259CrossRefPubMed Mai SK, Welzel G, Hermann B et al (2009) Can the radiation dose to CT-enlarged but FDG-PET-negative inguinal lymph nodes in anal cancer be reduced? Strahlenther Onkol 185:254–259CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Iagaru A, Kundu R, Jadvar H et al (2009) Evaluation by (18)F-FDG-PET of patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma. Hell J Nucl Med 12:26–28PubMed Iagaru A, Kundu R, Jadvar H et al (2009) Evaluation by (18)F-FDG-PET of patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma. Hell J Nucl Med 12:26–28PubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of FDG PET/CT in the staging and the follow-up of anal carcinoma
Authors
Laetitia Vercellino
Françoise Montravers
Vincent de Parades
Virginie Huchet
Khaldoun Kerrou
Pierre Bauer
Emmanuel Touboul
Jean-Noël Talbot
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1080-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2/2011 Go to the issue