Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 12/2010

01-12-2010 | Original Article

Evaluation of the NiTi Shape Memory BioDynamix ColonRing™ in colorectal anastomosis: first in human multi-center study

Authors: Hagit Tulchinsky, Hanoch Kashtan, Micha Rabau, Nir Wasserberg

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 12/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Shape-memory compression bowel anastomosis using a nickel and titanium alloy may reduce leak rates and eliminate foreign anastomotic material. Its safety and efficacy had been demonstrated by animal studies. We conducted the first prospective multi-center clinical evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of BioDynamix anastomosis with ColonRing™ for large-bowel end-to-end or side-to-end anastomosis.

Materials and methods

The ColonRing™ was compared to the standard double-stapled colorectal/colocolonic anastomosis. Intraoperative and immediate postoperative and 1- and 3-month postoperative follow-up data were recorded.

Results

Ten study patients (four males, median age 62 years, range 35–75) were compared to 13 demographically matched controls (six males, median age 62 years, range 47–82). Colorectal neoplasia was the most frequent indication for surgery (21/23 patients, 91%). The median anastomotic distance from the anal verge for both groups was 10 cm (6–20 cm). The first postoperative bowel movement was on day 5 ±2.2 (study group) and on day 4 ±1.8 (controls), and the median hospital stay was 8 days (6–14 days) and 7 days (6–13 days), respectively. There were no anastomotic leaks. There were three minor complications in each group, unrelated to the device in the study group. Two patients required transanal digital extraction of the ring which was detached but not expelled (one had a soft anastomotic stricture).

Conclusions

Our preliminary results in this first study on humans indicate that the safety and efficacy of BioDynamix anastomosis with ColonRing™ in colorectal anastomosis in human is comparable to standard staples technology and warrant larger studies for further validation.
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference Thiede A, Geiger D, Dietz UA, Debus ES, Engemann R, Lexer GC et al (1988) Overview on compression anastomoses: biofragmentable anastomosis ring multicenter prospective trial of 1666 anastomoses. World J Surg 22:78–86CrossRef Thiede A, Geiger D, Dietz UA, Debus ES, Engemann R, Lexer GC et al (1988) Overview on compression anastomoses: biofragmentable anastomosis ring multicenter prospective trial of 1666 anastomoses. World J Surg 22:78–86CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wullstein C, Gross E (2000) Compression anastomosis (AKA-2) in colorectal surgery: results in 442 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 87:1071–1075CrossRefPubMed Wullstein C, Gross E (2000) Compression anastomosis (AKA-2) in colorectal surgery: results in 442 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 87:1071–1075CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kapanen A, Ryhänen J, Danilov A, Tuukkanen J (2001) Effect of nickel–titanium shape memory metal alloy on bone formation. Biomaterials 22:2475–2480CrossRefPubMed Kapanen A, Ryhänen J, Danilov A, Tuukkanen J (2001) Effect of nickel–titanium shape memory metal alloy on bone formation. Biomaterials 22:2475–2480CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Baynosa RC, Stutman R, Mahabir RC, Zamboni WA, Khiabani KT (2008) Use of a novel penetrating, sutureless anastomotic device in arterial microvascular anastomoses. J Reconstr Microsurg 24:39–42CrossRefPubMed Baynosa RC, Stutman R, Mahabir RC, Zamboni WA, Khiabani KT (2008) Use of a novel penetrating, sutureless anastomotic device in arterial microvascular anastomoses. J Reconstr Microsurg 24:39–42CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lustosa SAS, Matos D, Atallah AN, Castro AA (2001) Stapled versus hand sewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003144PubMed Lustosa SAS, Matos D, Atallah AN, Castro AA (2001) Stapled versus hand sewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003144PubMed
9.
go back to reference Ravitch MM (1982) Development of intestinal anastomotic devices. S Med J 75:1520–1524 Ravitch MM (1982) Development of intestinal anastomotic devices. S Med J 75:1520–1524
10.
go back to reference Murphy JB (1982) Chloecysto-intestinal, gastrointestinal, enterointestinal anastomosis and approximation without sutures. Med Rec 42:665–676 Murphy JB (1982) Chloecysto-intestinal, gastrointestinal, enterointestinal anastomosis and approximation without sutures. Med Rec 42:665–676
11.
go back to reference Hardy TG Jr, Pace WG, Maney JW, Katz AR, Kaganov AL (1985) A biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosis. An experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum 28:484–490CrossRefPubMed Hardy TG Jr, Pace WG, Maney JW, Katz AR, Kaganov AL (1985) A biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosis. An experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum 28:484–490CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kanshin NN, Lytkin MI, Knysh VI, Klur VIu, Khamidov AI (1984) First experience with application of compression anastomoses with the apparatus AKA-2 in operations on the large intestine. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek 132:52–57PubMed Kanshin NN, Lytkin MI, Knysh VI, Klur VIu, Khamidov AI (1984) First experience with application of compression anastomoses with the apparatus AKA-2 in operations on the large intestine. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek 132:52–57PubMed
13.
go back to reference Waxman BP, Yii MK, Pahlman L (1995) Stapling in colorectal surgery. In: Mazier WP (ed) Surgery of the colon, rectum and anus. WB Saunders, Philadelphia Waxman BP, Yii MK, Pahlman L (1995) Stapling in colorectal surgery. In: Mazier WP (ed) Surgery of the colon, rectum and anus. WB Saunders, Philadelphia
14.
go back to reference Kopelman D, Lelcuk S, Sayfan J, Matter I, Willenz EP, Zaidenstein L et al (2007) End-to-end compression anastomosis of the rectum: a pig model. World J Surg 31:532–537CrossRefPubMed Kopelman D, Lelcuk S, Sayfan J, Matter I, Willenz EP, Zaidenstein L et al (2007) End-to-end compression anastomosis of the rectum: a pig model. World J Surg 31:532–537CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Stewart D, Hunt S, Pierce R, Mao D, Frisella M, Cook K et al (2007) Validation of the NITI endoluminal compression anastomosis ring (EndoCAR) device and comparison to the traditional circular stapled colorectal anastomosis in a porcine model. Surg Innov 14:252–260PubMed Stewart D, Hunt S, Pierce R, Mao D, Frisella M, Cook K et al (2007) Validation of the NITI endoluminal compression anastomosis ring (EndoCAR) device and comparison to the traditional circular stapled colorectal anastomosis in a porcine model. Surg Innov 14:252–260PubMed
16.
go back to reference Nudelman I, Fuko V, Waserberg N, Niv Y, Rubin M, Szold A et al (2005) Colonic anastomosis performed with a memory-shaped device. Am J Surg 190:434–438CrossRefPubMed Nudelman I, Fuko V, Waserberg N, Niv Y, Rubin M, Szold A et al (2005) Colonic anastomosis performed with a memory-shaped device. Am J Surg 190:434–438CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference D'Hoore A, Hompes D, Folkesson J, Penninckx F, Pahlman L (2008) Circular 'superelastic' compression anastomosis: from the animal lab to the clinical practice. Minim Invasive Ther 17(3):172–175CrossRef D'Hoore A, Hompes D, Folkesson J, Penninckx F, Pahlman L (2008) Circular 'superelastic' compression anastomosis: from the animal lab to the clinical practice. Minim Invasive Ther 17(3):172–175CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of the NiTi Shape Memory BioDynamix ColonRing™ in colorectal anastomosis: first in human multi-center study
Authors
Hagit Tulchinsky
Hanoch Kashtan
Micha Rabau
Nir Wasserberg
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 12/2010
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-0985-7

Other articles of this Issue 12/2010

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 12/2010 Go to the issue