Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 8/2009

01-08-2009 | Original Article

Multicentre review of lymph node harvest in colorectal cancer

Are we understaging colorectal cancer patients?

Authors: P. J. Mitchell, S. Ravi, B. Grifftiths, F. Reid, D. Speake, C. Midgley, N. Mapstone

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 8/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Lymph node examination in colorectal cancer is of vital importance for accurate staging. Patients who have fewer nodes examined may be understaged and not offered adjuvant chemotherapy. The national institute of clinical excellence and the association of coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland both recommend that 12 nodes should be examined for accurate staging. The aim of this study was to assess lymph node harvest at five hospitals in the northwest of England in respect to these guidelines.

Materials and methods

This study is a retrospective review of all colorectal cancer resections over a 1-year period at five hospitals.

Results

Two hospitals met the national guidelines of a median of 12 or more nodes. Overall, over 50% of colorectal cancers contained fewer than 12 nodes. Fifty-three point seven percent (53.7%) of Dukes B patients did not have 12 nodes in their specimens and may therefore be understaged. There was a significant variation between hospitals in terms of the number of cancers with 12 or more nodes (P < 0.0001) and the number of Dukes B cancers with 12 or more nodes (P < 0.008).

Conclusion

Over 50% of all colorectal cancer specimens contain fewer than 12 lymph nodes despite clear national guidelines. This is of particular importance to Dukes B cancers where over 53% of cases may be understaged and not offered adjuvant therapy. Significant variation exists between hospitals within the same region.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Swanson RS et al (2003) The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol 10(1):65–71PubMedCrossRef Swanson RS et al (2003) The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol 10(1):65–71PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tepper JE et al (2001) Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 19(1):157–163PubMed Tepper JE et al (2001) Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 19(1):157–163PubMed
3.
go back to reference Goldstein NS (2002) Lymph node recoveries from 2,427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol 26(2):179–189PubMedCrossRef Goldstein NS (2002) Lymph node recoveries from 2,427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol 26(2):179–189PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Maurel J et al (1998) Lymph node harvest reporting in patients with carcinoma of the large bowel: a French population-based study. Cancer 82(8):1482–1486PubMedCrossRef Maurel J et al (1998) Lymph node harvest reporting in patients with carcinoma of the large bowel: a French population-based study. Cancer 82(8):1482–1486PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Johnson PM, Malatjalian D, Porter GA (2002) Adequacy of nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study. J Gastrointest Surg 6(6):883–888 discussion 889–890PubMedCrossRef Johnson PM, Malatjalian D, Porter GA (2002) Adequacy of nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study. J Gastrointest Surg 6(6):883–888 discussion 889–890PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hermanek P, Henson DE, Hutter RVP (1993) Colorectal carcinoma. UICC TNM supplement—a commentary on uniform use. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 69–71 appendix II Hermanek P, Henson DE, Hutter RVP (1993) Colorectal carcinoma. UICC TNM supplement—a commentary on uniform use. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 69–71 appendix II
7.
go back to reference National Institute of Clinical Excellence (2004) Guidance on cancer services. Improving outcomes in colorectal cancer. National Institute of Clinical Excellence, London, pp 70–79 National Institute of Clinical Excellence (2004) Guidance on cancer services. Improving outcomes in colorectal cancer. National Institute of Clinical Excellence, London, pp 70–79
8.
go back to reference Nelson H et al (2001) Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(8):583–596PubMedCrossRef Nelson H et al (2001) Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(8):583–596PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (2007) Guidelines for the management of colorectal cancer. Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, London, pp 53–65 Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (2007) Guidelines for the management of colorectal cancer. Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, London, pp 53–65
10.
go back to reference Evans MD et al (2008) The impact of surgeon and pathologist on lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer and its impact on survival for patients with Dukes’ stage B disease. Colorectal Dis 10(2):157–164PubMed Evans MD et al (2008) The impact of surgeon and pathologist on lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer and its impact on survival for patients with Dukes’ stage B disease. Colorectal Dis 10(2):157–164PubMed
11.
go back to reference Baxter NN et al (2005) Impact of preoperative radiation for rectal cancer on subsequent lymph node evaluation: a population-based analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61(2):426–431PubMed Baxter NN et al (2005) Impact of preoperative radiation for rectal cancer on subsequent lymph node evaluation: a population-based analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61(2):426–431PubMed
12.
go back to reference Cserni G, Vinh-Hung V, Burzykowski T (2002) Is there a minimum number of lymph nodes that should be histologically assessed for a reliable nodal staging of T3N0M0 colorectal carcinomas? J Surg Oncol 81:63–69PubMedCrossRef Cserni G, Vinh-Hung V, Burzykowski T (2002) Is there a minimum number of lymph nodes that should be histologically assessed for a reliable nodal staging of T3N0M0 colorectal carcinomas? J Surg Oncol 81:63–69PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wong JH et al (1999) Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 17(9):2896–2900PubMed Wong JH et al (1999) Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 17(9):2896–2900PubMed
14.
go back to reference Baxter NN et al (2005) Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(3):219–225PubMedCrossRef Baxter NN et al (2005) Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(3):219–225PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wright FC et al (2003) Lymph node retrieval and assessment in stage II colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 10(8):903–909PubMedCrossRef Wright FC et al (2003) Lymph node retrieval and assessment in stage II colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 10(8):903–909PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pheby DF et al (2004) Lymph node harvests directly influence the staging of colorectal cancer: evidence from a regional audit. J Clin Pathol 57(1):43–47PubMedCrossRef Pheby DF et al (2004) Lymph node harvests directly influence the staging of colorectal cancer: evidence from a regional audit. J Clin Pathol 57(1):43–47PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Prandi M, Lionetto R, Bini A (2002) Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial. Ann Surg 235:458–463PubMedCrossRef Prandi M, Lionetto R, Bini A (2002) Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial. Ann Surg 235:458–463PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Le Voyer TE et al (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0,089. J Clin Oncol 21(15):2912–2919PubMedCrossRef Le Voyer TE et al (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0,089. J Clin Oncol 21(15):2912–2919PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Morris M et al (2006) Population-based study of prognostic factors in stage II colonic cancer. Br J Surg 93(7):866–871PubMedCrossRef Morris M et al (2006) Population-based study of prognostic factors in stage II colonic cancer. Br J Surg 93(7):866–871PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gorog D et al (2003) Influence of obesity on lymph node recovery from rectal resection specimens. Pathol Oncol Res 9(3):180–183PubMedCrossRef Gorog D et al (2003) Influence of obesity on lymph node recovery from rectal resection specimens. Pathol Oncol Res 9(3):180–183PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Morschel M et al (1996) Lymph node dissection, stage migration and perioperative risk in rectal carcinoma. Chirurg 67:915–920PubMedCrossRef Morschel M et al (1996) Lymph node dissection, stage migration and perioperative risk in rectal carcinoma. Chirurg 67:915–920PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Haboubi NY et al (1992) The importance of combining xylene clearance and immunohistochemistry in the accurate staging of colorectal carcinoma. J R Soc Med 85:386–388PubMed Haboubi NY et al (1992) The importance of combining xylene clearance and immunohistochemistry in the accurate staging of colorectal carcinoma. J R Soc Med 85:386–388PubMed
23.
go back to reference Cawthorn SJ, Gibbs NM, Marks CG (1986) Clearance technique for the detection of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 73(1):58–60PubMedCrossRef Cawthorn SJ, Gibbs NM, Marks CG (1986) Clearance technique for the detection of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 73(1):58–60PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
go back to reference Poller DN (2000) Method of specimen fixation and pathological dissection of colorectal cancer influences retrieval of lymph nodes and tumour nodal stage. Eur J Surg Oncol 26(8):758–762PubMedCrossRef Poller DN (2000) Method of specimen fixation and pathological dissection of colorectal cancer influences retrieval of lymph nodes and tumour nodal stage. Eur J Surg Oncol 26(8):758–762PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Smith AJ et al (2003) Multimodal CME for surgeons and pathologists improves colon cancer staging. J Cancer Educ 18(2):81–86PubMedCrossRef Smith AJ et al (2003) Multimodal CME for surgeons and pathologists improves colon cancer staging. J Cancer Educ 18(2):81–86PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Smith JJ et al (2007) The national bowel cancer audit project 2007. Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, London, pp 63–64 Smith JJ et al (2007) The national bowel cancer audit project 2007. Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, London, pp 63–64
Metadata
Title
Multicentre review of lymph node harvest in colorectal cancer
Are we understaging colorectal cancer patients?
Authors
P. J. Mitchell
S. Ravi
B. Grifftiths
F. Reid
D. Speake
C. Midgley
N. Mapstone
Publication date
01-08-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 8/2009
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0697-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2009

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 8/2009 Go to the issue