Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 9/2009

01-09-2009 | Review

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing botulinum toxin injection with lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure

Authors: Wan-Jin Shao, Guo-Chun Li, Zhi-Kun Zhang

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 9/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this review is to systematically analyze the prospective randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of botulinum toxin injection (Botox) vs. lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) for the treatment of chronic anal fissure (CAF).

Materials and methods

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken. The prospective randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of Botox vs. LIS for the management of CAF were selected according to specific criteria and analyzed to generate pooling data.

Results

Four studies encompassing 279 patients were qualified for the meta-analysis. There was a statistically significant higher healing in LIS group compared with Botox group (RR 1.31[1.57, 1.50] 95% CI, z = 4.11, p < 0.0001). Absolute benefit increase rate (ABI) is 23% for LIS group compared with Botox group. The recurrence rate was statistically significantly higher in Botox groups than in LIS groups (RR 5.83[2.96, 11.49] 95% CI, z = 5.09, p < 0.00001).LIS was associated with a high rate of minor anal incontinence as compared to Botox (RR 0.08[0.01, 0.59] 95% CI, z = 2.47, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

Botulinum toxin injection was associated with a higher rate of recurrent disease. LIS was more effective in healing chronic anal fissure.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Nyam DC, Pemberton JH (1999) Long-term results of lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure with particular reference to incidence of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 42(10):1306–10PubMedCrossRef Nyam DC, Pemberton JH (1999) Long-term results of lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure with particular reference to incidence of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 42(10):1306–10PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nelson R (2004) A systematic review of medical therapy for anal fissure. Dis Colon Rectum 47(4):422–431PubMedCrossRef Nelson R (2004) A systematic review of medical therapy for anal fissure. Dis Colon Rectum 47(4):422–431PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Higgins J, Green S (eds). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6. In The Cochrane library, 2006. Issue 4. Wiley: Chichester (updated September 2006). Higgins J, Green S (eds). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6. In The Cochrane library, 2006. Issue 4. Wiley: Chichester (updated September 2006).
5.
go back to reference Dickersin K, Manheimer E, Wieland S, Robinson KA, Lefebvre C, McDonald S (2002) Development of the Cochrane Collaboration's CENTRAL Register of controlled clinical trials. Eval Health Prof 25:38–64PubMed Dickersin K, Manheimer E, Wieland S, Robinson KA, Lefebvre C, McDonald S (2002) Development of the Cochrane Collaboration's CENTRAL Register of controlled clinical trials. Eval Health Prof 25:38–64PubMed
6.
go back to reference Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 323:42–46PubMedCrossRef Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 323:42–46PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ (1993) Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 270:2598–2601PubMedCrossRef Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ (1993) Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 270:2598–2601PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ (1994) Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 271:59–63PubMedCrossRef Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ (1994) Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 271:59–63PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12PubMedCrossRef Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M et al (1998) Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 352:609–613PubMedCrossRef Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M et al (1998) Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 352:609–613PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560PubMedCrossRef Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560PubMedCrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference Arroyo A, Perez F, Serrano P et al (2005) Surgical versus chemical (botulinum toxin) sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: long-term results of a prospective randomized clinical and manometric study. Am J Surg 189:429–34PubMedCrossRef Arroyo A, Perez F, Serrano P et al (2005) Surgical versus chemical (botulinum toxin) sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: long-term results of a prospective randomized clinical and manometric study. Am J Surg 189:429–34PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mentes BB, Irkorucu O, Akin M et al (2003) Comparison of botulinum toxin injection and lateral internal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Dis Colon Rectum 46(2):232–237PubMedCrossRef Mentes BB, Irkorucu O, Akin M et al (2003) Comparison of botulinum toxin injection and lateral internal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Dis Colon Rectum 46(2):232–237PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Iswariah H, Stephens J, Rieger N, Rodda D, Hewett P (2005) Randomized prospective controlled trial of lateral internal sphincterotomy versus injection of botulinum toxin for the treatment of idiopathic fissure in ano. ANZ J Surg 75(7):553–5 JulPubMedCrossRef Iswariah H, Stephens J, Rieger N, Rodda D, Hewett P (2005) Randomized prospective controlled trial of lateral internal sphincterotomy versus injection of botulinum toxin for the treatment of idiopathic fissure in ano. ANZ J Surg 75(7):553–5 JulPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Massoud BW, Mehrdad V, Baharak T, Alireza Z (2005) Botulinum toxin injection versus internal anal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Ann Saudi Med. Mar-Apr 25(2):140–2 Massoud BW, Mehrdad V, Baharak T, Alireza Z (2005) Botulinum toxin injection versus internal anal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Ann Saudi Med. Mar-Apr 25(2):140–2
17.
go back to reference Arroyo Sebastián A, Pérez Vicente F, Miranda Tauler E, Sánchez Romero A, Serrano Paz P, Calpena Rico R (2005) Surgical (close lateral internal sphincterotomy) versus chemical (botulinum toxin) sphincterotomy as treatment of chronic anal fissure. Med Clin (Barc) 124(15):573–5CrossRef Arroyo Sebastián A, Pérez Vicente F, Miranda Tauler E, Sánchez Romero A, Serrano Paz P, Calpena Rico R (2005) Surgical (close lateral internal sphincterotomy) versus chemical (botulinum toxin) sphincterotomy as treatment of chronic anal fissure. Med Clin (Barc) 124(15):573–5CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Utzig MJ, Kroesen AJ, Buhr HJ (2003) Concepts in pathogenesis and treatment of chronic anal fissure–a review of the literature. Am J Gastroenterol 98(5):968–74PubMed Utzig MJ, Kroesen AJ, Buhr HJ (2003) Concepts in pathogenesis and treatment of chronic anal fissure–a review of the literature. Am J Gastroenterol 98(5):968–74PubMed
19.
go back to reference Brisinda G, Maria G, Bentivoglio AR, Cassetta E, Gui D, Albanese A (1999) A comparison of injections of botulinum toxin and topical nitroglycerin ointment for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. N Engl J Med 341(2):65–9PubMedCrossRef Brisinda G, Maria G, Bentivoglio AR, Cassetta E, Gui D, Albanese A (1999) A comparison of injections of botulinum toxin and topical nitroglycerin ointment for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. N Engl J Med 341(2):65–9PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing botulinum toxin injection with lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure
Authors
Wan-Jin Shao
Guo-Chun Li
Zhi-Kun Zhang
Publication date
01-09-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 9/2009
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0683-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2009

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 9/2009 Go to the issue